BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

chores

Expert replies

by uptowngirl92 » Thu Oct 01, 2009 8:33 pm
Really confused..
How is the second part of OA: b an independant sentence??

by 1997 that figure had grown to nearly six hours a week

Please explain
Join the discussion

by vaibhav.iit2002 » Fri Oct 02, 2009 2:14 am
Karen,

Do you mean to say we can use past perfect even if there are not 2 sentences that occurred in different times?

Why there is not past perfect with the first sentence of 1981?
Join the discussion

by Karen » Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:57 am
Yes, I'm saying that you don't have to have two different *sentences* to justify the use of the past perfect. The past perfect just means that one event occurred before some other point in the past. In this case, the point in the past is expressed by the phrase "by 1997."

You can't use past perfect with "in 1981" because the sentence doesn't mean that anything happened *before* 1981.
Karen van Hoek, PhD
Verbal Specialist

Test Prep New York
maximize your score, minimize your stress
www.testprepny.com
[email protected]
Join the discussion

by uptowngirl92 » Sat Oct 24, 2009 3:31 pm
Okay I understood why D is wrong and B is right w.r.tverb tense and everything..somebody said that in D there is wrong comparison wheres that is not the case in B.Can somebody please explain what exactly is compared and how in both choices B an D??
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:00 am
Why E is wrong.

E is "absolute construction". why this construction is wrong inhere?

Pls, help
Join the discussion

Usage of Past Perfect tense

by pink_08 » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:45 pm
Hi,


Can we have to have two different *sentences* to justify the use of the past perfect.
What about two different releated sentences -
Any examples ??/

Manhattan says -
"The past perfect just means that one event occurred before some other point in the past."

The sequence is clear if the past perfect is in a single sentence ( e.g The movie had started by the time we arrived at the theatre )

pink
Join the discussion

by crackgmat007 » Fri Nov 06, 2009 12:11 pm
Someone said in the earlier post that 'they' is ambigious in A. Why is it so? Doesnt it refer to 'children' clearly?
Join the discussion

Why E is wrong, pls, help

by tanviet » Mon Nov 09, 2009 3:51 am
pls, help, why E is wrong
Join the discussion

by Karen » Tue Nov 24, 2009 9:14 am
E is wrong for two reasons:

1. It changes the meaning. Instead of saying the figure had grown by 1997, it says the figure grew *in* 1997.

2. This modifier clause with a gerund and a subject of its own -- "that figure growing" -- is not standard English. I'm poking around a little to see if I can find more information on this; if anyone thinks they have an example of a similar structure that *is* allowed, please feel free to share.
Karen van Hoek, PhD
Verbal Specialist

Test Prep New York
maximize your score, minimize your stress
www.testprepny.com
[email protected]
Join the discussion

by umaa » Wed Nov 25, 2009 8:45 am
Whats wrong with C? I couldn't find anything wrong in it.
What we think, we become
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:59 pm
A has pronoun problem

C meaning is not clear

D modifier is not logic

E is absolute structure which tell about an action which happen at the same time as action of main clause (I read this from a grammar book). "happen at the same time" is not logic here. I am not clear of this. pls help with this

it is harder to find out error in meaning than small error in grammar, such as "in 1981" and "by1997". However, error "in 1981,by 1997" is brutal
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Wed Nov 25, 2009 11:09 pm
absolute construction is a phrase which has noun and an adjective, normally a participle. this phrase tells an action happening at the same time as action of main clause.

the question 86 of OG 10 is an example.

I am not confident of this structure. anyone know this, pls, help me
Join the discussion