This problem was touched upon before on this forum, but very briefly. Can someone please explain where my work went wrong?
If Bob produces 36 or fewer items in a week, he is paid x dollars per item. If Bob produces more than 36 items in a week, he is paid x dollars per item for the first 36 items and 1.5 times that amount for each additional item. How many items did Bob produce last week?
(1) Last week Bob was paid a total of $480 for the items that he produced that week.
(2) This week Bob produced 2 items more than last week and was paid a total of $510 for the items that he produced this week.
OA: E
I chose C, and this is what I did:
Let n = number of items
From statement 1:
xn + 1.5x(n - 36) = 480 --> 2.5xn - 54x = 480
From statement 2:
I only subtracted 34, since he produced 2 more items.
xn + 1.5x(n - 34) = 510 --> 2.5xn - 51x = 510 --> xn = .4(510 + 51x)
Now combined:
2.5(.4(510 + 51x) - 54x = 480 --> solve for x. And then you can solve for n.
What did I do wrong?
Bob GMATPrep Problem
This topic has expert replies
- rockeyb
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:15 am
- Location: Nagpur , India
- Thanked: 41 times
- Followed by:1 members
This is where you went wrong twice in statement 1 and 2 . Do you know for sure that the items produced are more than 36 in each occasion.student22 wrote:This problem was touched upon before on this forum, but very briefly. Can someone please explain where my work went wrong?
If Bob produces 36 or fewer items in a week, he is paid x dollars per item. If Bob produces more than 36 items in a week, he is paid x dollars per item for the first 36 items and 1.5 times that amount for each additional item. How many items did Bob produce last week?
(1) Last week Bob was paid a total of $480 for the items that he produced that week.
(2) This week Bob produced 2 items more than last week and was paid a total of $510 for the items that he produced this week.
OA: E
I chose C, and this is what I did:
Let n = number of items
From statement 1:
xn + 1.5x(n - 36) = 480 --> 2.5xn - 54x = 480
From statement 2:
I only subtracted 34, since he produced 2 more items.
xn + 1.5x(n - 34) = 510 --> 2.5xn - 51x = 510 --> xn = .4(510 + 51x)
What did I do wrong?
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
Vow!! this was a good one.
First your minor errors marked in green in quoted text.
But wait.
We are asked what is the the number of items produced? And in the above quoted text we are assuming that the number is greater than 36. But he can very well produce less than 36 in which case equations would be
from 1: nx=480
from 2: (n+2)x=510
therefore 2x=30, so x=15, n=32
So even after combining 2 statements we get two valid values for n.
Therefore both statements are together INSUFFICIENT.
Hence E.
HTH
First your minor errors marked in green in quoted text.
So these are 2 equations in 2 unknowns and hence the obvious is C. x=10, n=44Let n = number of items
From statement 1:
36x + 1.5x(n - 36) = 480
From statement 2:
I only subtracted 34, since he produced 2 more items.
36x + 1.5x(n - 34) = 510
But wait.
We are asked what is the the number of items produced? And in the above quoted text we are assuming that the number is greater than 36. But he can very well produce less than 36 in which case equations would be
from 1: nx=480
from 2: (n+2)x=510
therefore 2x=30, so x=15, n=32
So even after combining 2 statements we get two valid values for n.
Therefore both statements are together INSUFFICIENT.
Hence E.
HTH
"Choose to chance the rapids and dance the tides"
- arora007
- Community Manager
- Posts: 1048
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 3:26 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 51 times
- Followed by:27 members
- GMAT Score:670
perfect trap... fortunately I did not step it!
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance
pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance
pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1337
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 6:29 pm
- Thanked: 127 times
- Followed by:10 members
given and find the number of items produced last week, y-?
st(1) Insufficient, as we have no clue about the number of items produced last week;
st(2) Insufficient, as we have no clue about the number of items produced this week and may not deduct the number of items produced last week;
Combined st(1&2) (510-480)/(y-2)= {x or 1.5x} we cannot solve for y, as we need to define x or 1.5x? Not Sufficient.
answer E, where's the trick here?
st(1) Insufficient, as we have no clue about the number of items produced last week;
st(2) Insufficient, as we have no clue about the number of items produced this week and may not deduct the number of items produced last week;
Combined st(1&2) (510-480)/(y-2)= {x or 1.5x} we cannot solve for y, as we need to define x or 1.5x? Not Sufficient.
answer E, where's the trick here?
student22 wrote:This problem was touched upon before on this forum, but very briefly. Can someone please explain where my work went wrong?
If Bob produces 36 or fewer items in a week, he is paid x dollars per item. If Bob produces more than 36 items in a week, he is paid x dollars per item for the first 36 items and 1.5 times that amount for each additional item. How many items did Bob produce last week?
(1) Last week Bob was paid a total of $480 for the items that he produced that week.
(2) This week Bob produced 2 items more than last week and was paid a total of $510 for the items that he produced this week.
OA: E
I chose C, and this is what I did:
Let n = number of items
From statement 1:
xn + 1.5x(n - 36) = 480 --> 2.5xn - 54x = 480
From statement 2:
I only subtracted 34, since he produced 2 more items.
xn + 1.5x(n - 34) = 510 --> 2.5xn - 51x = 510 --> xn = .4(510 + 51x)
Now combined:
2.5(.4(510 + 51x) - 54x = 480 --> solve for x. And then you can solve for n.
What did I do wrong?
My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at https://www.gmatpill.com
- ankurmit
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:42 am
- Location: Mumbai
- Thanked: 14 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:710
I dont know where you messed up but
we get this equation
From statement 1:
36x + 1.5x(n - 36) = 480
From statement 2:
I only subtracted 34, since he produced 2 more items.
36x + 1.5x(n - 34) = 510
There are 2 equations and 2 variables and we can find them.
But this is not the only case :
We are asked what is the the number of items produced? And in the above quoted text we are assuming that the number is greater than 36. But he can very well produce less than 36 in which case equations would be
from 1: nx=480
from 2: (n+2)x=510
therefore 2x=30, so x=15, n=32
Hence answer is E.
Hope you understand it
we get this equation
From statement 1:
36x + 1.5x(n - 36) = 480
From statement 2:
I only subtracted 34, since he produced 2 more items.
36x + 1.5x(n - 34) = 510
There are 2 equations and 2 variables and we can find them.
But this is not the only case :
We are asked what is the the number of items produced? And in the above quoted text we are assuming that the number is greater than 36. But he can very well produce less than 36 in which case equations would be
from 1: nx=480
from 2: (n+2)x=510
therefore 2x=30, so x=15, n=32
Hence answer is E.
Hope you understand it
--------
Ankur mittal
Ankur mittal