BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Bob GMATPrep Problem

Expert replies
by student22 » Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:05 am
This problem was touched upon before on this forum, but very briefly. Can someone please explain where my work went wrong?

If Bob produces 36 or fewer items in a week, he is paid x dollars per item. If Bob produces more than 36 items in a week, he is paid x dollars per item for the first 36 items and 1.5 times that amount for each additional item. How many items did Bob produce last week?

(1) Last week Bob was paid a total of $480 for the items that he produced that week.

(2) This week Bob produced 2 items more than last week and was paid a total of $510 for the items that he produced this week.

OA: E


I chose C, and this is what I did:

Let n = number of items

From statement 1:
xn + 1.5x(n - 36) = 480 --> 2.5xn - 54x = 480

From statement 2:
I only subtracted 34, since he produced 2 more items.
xn + 1.5x(n - 34) = 510 --> 2.5xn - 51x = 510 --> xn = .4(510 + 51x)

Now combined:
2.5(.4(510 + 51x) - 54x = 480 --> solve for x. And then you can solve for n.

What did I do wrong?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by rockeyb » Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:58 am
student22 wrote:This problem was touched upon before on this forum, but very briefly. Can someone please explain where my work went wrong?

If Bob produces 36 or fewer items in a week, he is paid x dollars per item. If Bob produces more than 36 items in a week, he is paid x dollars per item for the first 36 items and 1.5 times that amount for each additional item. How many items did Bob produce last week?

(1) Last week Bob was paid a total of $480 for the items that he produced that week.

(2) This week Bob produced 2 items more than last week and was paid a total of $510 for the items that he produced this week.

OA: E


I chose C, and this is what I did:

Let n = number of items

From statement 1:
xn + 1.5x(n - 36) = 480 --> 2.5xn - 54x = 480

From statement 2:
I only subtracted 34, since he produced 2 more items.
xn + 1.5x(n - 34) = 510 --> 2.5xn - 51x = 510 --> xn = .4(510 + 51x)

What did I do wrong?
This is where you went wrong twice in statement 1 and 2 . Do you know for sure that the items produced are more than 36 in each occasion.
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
Join the discussion

by iamseer » Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:05 am
Vow!! this was a good one.

First your minor errors marked in green in quoted text.
Let n = number of items

From statement 1:
36x + 1.5x(n - 36) = 480

From statement 2:
I only subtracted 34, since he produced 2 more items.
36x + 1.5x(n - 34) = 510
So these are 2 equations in 2 unknowns and hence the obvious is C. x=10, n=44
But wait.

We are asked what is the the number of items produced? And in the above quoted text we are assuming that the number is greater than 36. But he can very well produce less than 36 in which case equations would be
from 1: nx=480
from 2: (n+2)x=510
therefore 2x=30, so x=15, n=32

So even after combining 2 statements we get two valid values for n.

Therefore both statements are together INSUFFICIENT.
Hence E.

HTH
"Choose to chance the rapids and dance the tides"
Join the discussion

by student22 » Tue Apr 27, 2010 10:38 am
Ah, good call guys. You're right I assumed (without reason) that there would be at least 36.

But, since we can't assume that here, as iamseer pointed out, it makes sense that it's E.

Thanks!
Join the discussion

by arora007 » Sun Feb 20, 2011 5:31 am
perfect trap... fortunately I did not step it!
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance

pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
Join the discussion

by ankurmit » Wed Feb 23, 2011 4:19 am
Unfortunately I stepped in :(
Nice quistion
--------
Ankur mittal
Join the discussion

by cyrwr1 » Wed Mar 02, 2011 1:47 pm
Are the quantities of 32 and 34 respectively, the only options?
Join the discussion

by Night reader » Wed Mar 02, 2011 2:31 pm
given and find the number of items produced last week, y-?
st(1) Insufficient, as we have no clue about the number of items produced last week;
st(2) Insufficient, as we have no clue about the number of items produced this week and may not deduct the number of items produced last week;
Combined st(1&2) (510-480)/(y-2)= {x or 1.5x} we cannot solve for y, as we need to define x or 1.5x? Not Sufficient.

answer E, where's the trick here? :(
student22 wrote:This problem was touched upon before on this forum, but very briefly. Can someone please explain where my work went wrong?

If Bob produces 36 or fewer items in a week, he is paid x dollars per item. If Bob produces more than 36 items in a week, he is paid x dollars per item for the first 36 items and 1.5 times that amount for each additional item. How many items did Bob produce last week?

(1) Last week Bob was paid a total of $480 for the items that he produced that week.

(2) This week Bob produced 2 items more than last week and was paid a total of $510 for the items that he produced this week.

OA: E


I chose C, and this is what I did:

Let n = number of items

From statement 1:
xn + 1.5x(n - 36) = 480 --> 2.5xn - 54x = 480

From statement 2:
I only subtracted 34, since he produced 2 more items.
xn + 1.5x(n - 34) = 510 --> 2.5xn - 51x = 510 --> xn = .4(510 + 51x)

Now combined:
2.5(.4(510 + 51x) - 54x = 480 --> solve for x. And then you can solve for n.

What did I do wrong?
My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at https://www.gmatpill.com
Join the discussion

by ankurmit » Thu Mar 03, 2011 6:35 am
I dont know where you messed up but

we get this equation

From statement 1:
36x + 1.5x(n - 36) = 480


From statement 2:
I only subtracted 34, since he produced 2 more items.
36x + 1.5x(n - 34) = 510

There are 2 equations and 2 variables and we can find them.

But this is not the only case :

We are asked what is the the number of items produced? And in the above quoted text we are assuming that the number is greater than 36. But he can very well produce less than 36 in which case equations would be
from 1: nx=480
from 2: (n+2)x=510
therefore 2x=30, so x=15, n=32

Hence answer is E.

Hope you understand it
--------
Ankur mittal
Join the discussion