integrated reasoning
This topic has expert replies
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 1:27 am
- Thanked: 5 times
- Followed by:2 members
question mentions min years of exp. to become a principal
for analyst it says<3 that means min =0
for associate it says 2 but can be relaxed(last point) so min again =0
for principal it says 4+ so min =4
sum all mins and we will have 4
for analyst it says<3 that means min =0
for associate it says 2 but can be relaxed(last point) so min again =0
for principal it says 4+ so min =4
sum all mins and we will have 4
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 423
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 7:59 am
- Location: Seattle, WA
- Thanked: 86 times
- Followed by:2 members
there was another similar question for the same information set provided about analyst, associate and partner:
John joined the bank as an Analyst when he was 22. One year later he asked for promotion to Associate. Is it possible that he will be promoted?
YES
[spoiler]I selected NO because 2 years is required from analyst to associate which could be relaxed if atleast 2 associates recommend the analyst strongly. No information is provided about any such reco or how much the 2 year restriction can be eased. I am really confused as to how much leeway do we have in such questions?[/spoiler]
John joined the bank as an Analyst when he was 22. One year later he asked for promotion to Associate. Is it possible that he will be promoted?
YES
[spoiler]I selected NO because 2 years is required from analyst to associate which could be relaxed if atleast 2 associates recommend the analyst strongly. No information is provided about any such reco or how much the 2 year restriction can be eased. I am really confused as to how much leeway do we have in such questions?[/spoiler]