Is 4^1/2 + 4^1/3 + 4^1/4, then value of M is?
1) less than 3
2) Equal to 3
3) btw 3 and 4
4) equal to 4
5) greater than 4
Is answer less than 3 here?
Also how can I do approximations here?
approximation
This topic has expert replies
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 9:06 pm
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi parulmahajan89,
The GMAT will NOT require you to calculate fractional "cube-roots" or fractional "quad-roots", so that's not what you should do here.
Notice how the answer choices are all "ranges"; that means that we can probably estimate the correct answer.
4^1/2 = 2 (that calculation is easy)
By comparison, 1^1/3 = 1 and 8^1/3 = 2, so...
4^1/3 is between 1 and 2
By comparison, 1^1/4 = 1 and 16^1/4 = 2, so....
4^1/4 is between 1 and 2
So, adding these values up gives us a total that is greater than 4.
Final Answer: E
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
The GMAT will NOT require you to calculate fractional "cube-roots" or fractional "quad-roots", so that's not what you should do here.
Notice how the answer choices are all "ranges"; that means that we can probably estimate the correct answer.
4^1/2 = 2 (that calculation is easy)
By comparison, 1^1/3 = 1 and 8^1/3 = 2, so...
4^1/3 is between 1 and 2
By comparison, 1^1/4 = 1 and 16^1/4 = 2, so....
4^1/4 is between 1 and 2
So, adding these values up gives us a total that is greater than 4.
Final Answer: E
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
![Image](https://s4.postimage.org/lk6deh2c/root_question.jpg)
Since the problem above asks only for an estimation, we can ballpark:
√4 = 2.
4^(1/3) > 1.
4^(1/4) = √2 ≈ 1.4.
So M > 4.4.
The correct answer is E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 447
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 7:25 am
- Thanked: 25 times
- Followed by:1 members
This goes beyond GMat, but hey...
Let b^12 = 4
Then we get M = (b^12)^1/2 + (b^12)^1/3 + (b^12)^1/4
So M = (b^6) + (b^4) + (b^3) = b^3 * (b^3 + b^1 + 1)
In base b, this would look like M = 100 * 1011 = 101100 (Base b)
Also 4 = 1000000000000 in base b
101100 < 1000000000000
So M < 4
Who can spot the flaw...
Let b^12 = 4
Then we get M = (b^12)^1/2 + (b^12)^1/3 + (b^12)^1/4
So M = (b^6) + (b^4) + (b^3) = b^3 * (b^3 + b^1 + 1)
In base b, this would look like M = 100 * 1011 = 101100 (Base b)
Also 4 = 1000000000000 in base b
101100 < 1000000000000
So M < 4
Who can spot the flaw...
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi Mathsbuddy,
I'm not sure what your goal is with this last post, but you seem "know" that what you're attempting is beyond the scope of the GMAT. It also appears that you also know that you made a mistake at some point in your logic. So I have to ask WHY are spending time presenting an idea that you KNOW is not part of the GMAT AND that you know is incorrect?
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
I'm not sure what your goal is with this last post, but you seem "know" that what you're attempting is beyond the scope of the GMAT. It also appears that you also know that you made a mistake at some point in your logic. So I have to ask WHY are spending time presenting an idea that you KNOW is not part of the GMAT AND that you know is incorrect?
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 447
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 7:25 am
- Thanked: 25 times
- Followed by:1 members
Hi Rich,[email protected] wrote:Hi Mathsbuddy,
I'm not sure what your goal is with this last post, but you seem "know" that what you're attempting is beyond the scope of the GMAT. It also appears that you also know that you made a mistake at some point in your logic. So I have to ask WHY are spending time presenting an idea that you KNOW is not part of the GMAT AND that you know is incorrect?
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
I see your point. Basically I saw this creative 'solution' in a flash in my head, so I had to try it out; and I thought that if I get it right, then for me personally it would be a super-quick way of solving it. The problem is that the answer is wrong and I couldn't see the mistake! If there's someone out there who understand bases, then maybe they can let me know what stupid thing I've overlooked
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/smile.png)
I made it clear at the start that it's not GMat, so people don't waste time on it. However, if someone does get it and can fix it, either I'll have a neat reusable method for future, or I can happily discard it if it's worthless. If it can be made to work, it just offers an alternative approach. I like to share logic from all sorts of angles.
A simplified (and corrected) version would be:
Let 4 = b^12 = 1000000000000 in base b where b > 1
So M = (b^6) + (b^4) + (b^3) = 1011000 (in Base b)
I just found the mistake now:
1011000 (Base b) = 5.001614614 (base ten) > 4
So M > 4 (Correct
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/smile.png)
Addendum (In base b:)
1000000 > 1
10000 > 1
1000 = 2 (base ten)
Therefore 1011000 > 4 (base ten)
I can't believe I didn't spot that before!
May that be a lesson to any base experts who expect a higher order value to be greater than a lower order value. This would only be true if the base were an integer > 1. That was my error.
The method is easily checked with a calculator. Although, it may not be ideal for this question (as the 12th root of 4 is not very practical), it could be very handy for the r = nth root of t, where r is an integer rather than a decimal.
If anyone finds this confusing, then just ignore it. (Otherwise I thought it potentially a clever quick trick).
Alternatively:
M-2 = 4^(1/3) + 4^(1/4) > 1 + 1.4 = 2.4
2.4 > 4 - 2
so M > 4
which is easier to visualise, (whether or not you can think in different bases, such as binary,etc.)
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 447
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 7:25 am
- Thanked: 25 times
- Followed by:1 members
Further to the my last post, here is the "base method" with the bases removed!
M = 4^1/2 + 4^1/3 + 4^1/4
So M = 2 + 4^1/3 + 4^1/4
Let 4 = b^12 where b > 1, (so b^n > 1 for n > 0)
So M = 2 + (b^4) + (b^3) > 2 + 1 + 1 = 4
So M > 4
M = 4^1/2 + 4^1/3 + 4^1/4
So M = 2 + 4^1/3 + 4^1/4
Let 4 = b^12 where b > 1, (so b^n > 1 for n > 0)
So M = 2 + (b^4) + (b^3) > 2 + 1 + 1 = 4
So M > 4