Considering all of the scientists who have been awarded the Nobel Prize, perhaps none is more lauded as the chemist Mendel, who pioneered the study of several new elements and paved the way for some of the great discoveries of the modern era.
A)perhaps none is more lauded as
B)perhaps none was more lauded as
C)it may be that none is more lauded than
D)maybe none is more lauded than
E)perhaps none was more lauded than
I believe the tense here should be present tense since first phrase uses "have been awarded".
But is this reasoning correct? OA is E
Tense Problem!
This topic has expert replies
- apurva.jalit
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 12:36 am
- Thanked: 1 times
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi apurva.jalit,
This SC has a two-part phrase built into it:
More....than....
Since all of the answer choices use the word "more", your answer needs the word "than." Eliminate A and B
Of the remaining answers, the proper style is to use the word "perhaps."
Final Answer: E
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
This SC has a two-part phrase built into it:
More....than....
Since all of the answer choices use the word "more", your answer needs the word "than." Eliminate A and B
Of the remaining answers, the proper style is to use the word "perhaps."
Final Answer: E
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
- vinay1983
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 4:27 am
- Thanked: 48 times
- Followed by:7 members
I think as is not correct usage, so A and B are out.
C has "it" so, it is wrong usage here.
D has "is", but we need was
E correct option
I think have been awarded has past activity in it, hence that should be followed by "was".
Hope I am right!
C has "it" so, it is wrong usage here.
D has "is", but we need was
E correct option
I think have been awarded has past activity in it, hence that should be followed by "was".
Hope I am right!
You can, for example never foretell what any one man will do, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to!
- apurva.jalit
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 12:36 am
- Thanked: 1 times
Hi vinay1983,
I feel that awarded is not the activity which we are discussing here, "is" or "was" determines whether this guy "Mendel" is still more lauded or this is a story of past. So I am not able to rule out present tense here.
I feel that awarded is not the activity which we are discussing here, "is" or "was" determines whether this guy "Mendel" is still more lauded or this is a story of past. So I am not able to rule out present tense here.
- vinay1983
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 4:27 am
- Thanked: 48 times
- Followed by:7 members
Hi Maybe I was too brief. What I am trying to say is Apart from the tenses and stuff also try to see what the sentence or author intends to say.apurva.jalit wrote:Hi vinay1983,
I feel that awarded is not the activity which we are discussing here, "is" or "was" determines whether this guy "Mendel" is still more lauded or this is a story of past. So I am not able to rule out present tense here.
Here initially it is said that "of all the scientist who were awarded some prize, none "was" as famous or recognized as was Mendel". Here we are not comparing "scientist" and "Mendel" per se, but rather their achievement or they being awarded the prize. It's something in the past that has happened and we are recognizing the fact that Mendel was the most lauded among the scientists.
It is difficult to specifically explain what you are asking. I would rather suggest understanding the intent or the context of the passage also.
Lots of words or phrases can have different intent or meaning based on the context.
I hope I am clear. Maybe the Experts can pitch in to help you resolve your dilemma better than me.
Thanks!
You can, for example never foretell what any one man will do, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to!
- apurva.jalit
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 12:36 am
- Thanked: 1 times
Thanks vinay1983 for taking efforts to explain it to me. I am still not very much convinced but do see the point you are trying to make. Will try analyse this question with a new approach ![Smile :)](./images/smilies/smile.png)
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/smile.png)
- vinay1983
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 4:27 am
- Thanked: 48 times
- Followed by:7 members
You are welcome. I am always trying to do my best at explaining.Hope you will be convinced by some posts and who knows it might help me too.apurva.jalit wrote:Thanks vinay1983 for taking efforts to explain it to me. I am still not very much convinced but do see the point you are trying to make. Will try analyse this question with a new approach
You can, for example never foretell what any one man will do, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to!