3)Unlike Edgar Allan Poe,whose works were ignored in his native country,the works of Hawthrone were read and appreciated by the public and by contemporary critics.
a.Edgar Allan Poe, whose works were ignored in his native country,the
b.Edgar Allan Poe whose native country ignored his work,the
c.the works of Edgar Allan Poe,ignored in his native country,the
d.the works of Edgar Allan Poe, which were ignored in his native country,the
e.the works of Edgar Allan Poe having been ignored in his native country,the
Need help!!!
Target Test Prep is 20% off right now!
Use code FLASH20
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
Ambiguous Appositive
This topic has expert replies
-
FightWithGMAT
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 364
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:13 am
- Thanked: 31 times
- Followed by:3 members
to me OA is D
3)Unlike Edgar Allan Poe,whose works were ignored in his native country,the works of Hawthrone were read and appreciated by the public and by contemporary critics.
a.Edgar Allan Poe, whose works were ignored in his native country,the
The sentence must be parallel to "the works of Hawthrone" . that's why works cannot be compared to human
b.Edgar Allan Poe whose native country ignored his work,the
incorrect. same reason for A
c.the works of Edgar Allan Poe,ignored in his native country,the
which needed
d.the works of Edgar Allan Poe, which were ignored in his native country,the
correct comparision
e.the works of Edgar Allan Poe having been ignored in his native country,the
some kind of awkward
3)Unlike Edgar Allan Poe,whose works were ignored in his native country,the works of Hawthrone were read and appreciated by the public and by contemporary critics.
a.Edgar Allan Poe, whose works were ignored in his native country,the
The sentence must be parallel to "the works of Hawthrone" . that's why works cannot be compared to human
b.Edgar Allan Poe whose native country ignored his work,the
incorrect. same reason for A
c.the works of Edgar Allan Poe,ignored in his native country,the
which needed
d.the works of Edgar Allan Poe, which were ignored in his native country,the
correct comparision
e.the works of Edgar Allan Poe having been ignored in his native country,the
some kind of awkward
Last edited by blaster on Thu Jun 17, 2010 3:47 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
kvcpk
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1893
- Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 11:48 pm
- Thanked: 215 times
- Followed by:7 members
IMO D.
non underlined portion of the sentence says "works of Hawthrone were read"
SO to maintain like comparison, we need to have "works of Edgar Allan "
So A,B are out..
In C, "ignored" is not clear on "Edgar Allan Poe" or his works
In E, having been is present perfect tense.. but non underlined portion tells us that the sentence shud be in Past..
So we need to have "were" instead of "having beeen"
That brings us to D
non underlined portion of the sentence says "works of Hawthrone were read"
SO to maintain like comparison, we need to have "works of Edgar Allan "
So A,B are out..
In C, "ignored" is not clear on "Edgar Allan Poe" or his works
In E, having been is present perfect tense.. but non underlined portion tells us that the sentence shud be in Past..
So we need to have "were" instead of "having beeen"
That brings us to D
-
FightWithGMAT
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 364
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:13 am
- Thanked: 31 times
- Followed by:3 members
The reason I posted this question is to know how we can conclude the ambiguity in the appositive.kvcpk wrote:IMO D.
non underlined portion of the sentence says "works of Hawthrone were read"
SO to maintain like comparison, we need to have "works of Edgar Allan "
So A,B are out..
In C, "ignored" is not clear on "Edgar Allan Poe" or his works
In E, having been is present perfect tense.. but non underlined portion tells us that the sentence shud be in Past..
So we need to have "were" instead of "having beeen"
That brings us to D
Should not "ignored" modify the subject before comma? And the subject here is "works" not Allan Poe.
What is the best way to deal with such issues??
Ron, if you could explain what GMAT thinks about this.
-
kvcpk
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1893
- Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 11:48 pm
- Thanked: 215 times
- Followed by:7 members
I think in the statement, "unlike the works of Edgar Allan Poe", the subject is Edgar Allan Poe. (let me know if i am wrong)FightWithGMAT wrote: The reason I posted this question is to know how we can conclude the ambiguity in the appositive.
Should not "ignored" modify the subject before comma? And the subject here is "works" not Allan Poe.
What is the best way to deal with such issues??
In that case, "ignored" should be referring to Edgar Allan Poe which is wrong.
-
martin.jonson007
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 1:46 am
- Thanked: 2 times
ABC -> obviously wrong....!
D and E too have their own set of problems...
in D , before starting 2nd sentence some sort of conjunction like and , but or whereas needed otherwise it is absolutly incorrect...!
In E option, having been... were make sentence not only not parallel but also awkward too...
but wud like 2 knw more comments abt E option...
but it is very clear that D have it own sets of PROBLEMS...
D and E too have their own set of problems...
in D , before starting 2nd sentence some sort of conjunction like and , but or whereas needed otherwise it is absolutly incorrect...!
In E option, having been... were make sentence not only not parallel but also awkward too...
but wud like 2 knw more comments abt E option...
but it is very clear that D have it own sets of PROBLEMS...
-
reply2spg
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
- Thanked: 27 times
- GMAT Score:570
I think E is correct here. However, I am confused regarding the use of 'which' in D. what is the OA?
FightWithGMAT wrote:3)Unlike Edgar Allan Poe,whose works were ignored in his native country,the works of Hawthrone were read and appreciated by the public and by contemporary critics.
a.Edgar Allan Poe, whose works were ignored in his native country,the
b.Edgar Allan Poe whose native country ignored his work,the
c.the works of Edgar Allan Poe,ignored in his native country,the
d.the works of Edgar Allan Poe, which were ignored in his native country,the
e.the works of Edgar Allan Poe having been ignored in his native country,the
Need help!!!
-
mohit11
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 9:08 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 36 times
- Followed by:5 members
- GMAT Score:730
Unlike Edgar Allan Poe,whose works were ignored in his native country,the works of Hawthrone were read and appreciated by the public and by contemporary critics.
a.Edgar Allan Poe, whose works were ignored in his native country,the
b.Edgar Allan Poe whose native country ignored his work,the
c.the works of Edgar Allan Poe,ignored in his native country,the
d.the works of Edgar Allan Poe, which were ignored in his native country,the
e.the works of Edgar Allan Poe having been ignored in his native country,the
Non underline part refers to Works of Hawthrone, therefore to avoid comparison error (comparing apples to oranges) we need to refer to works of Edgar. We are down to C, D and E.
Ignored does not clearly refer to Works of Edgar, there is ambiguity as to whether Ignored refers to Edgar or his works. C out.
E is just awful. usage of "having" is incorrect.
Reason why most people rule out D is that we have learned that comma which construction refers to the noun just before the comma. However, this understanding is only correct to an extent. comma which construction refers to the legitimate noun before the comma.
How do we decide which is the legitimate noun? The hint lies in the verb in the non underlined part. Here the verb is "were" A plural verb, hence which cannot refer to Edgar and refers to Works of Edgar. Answer D. Hope it helps.
a.Edgar Allan Poe, whose works were ignored in his native country,the
b.Edgar Allan Poe whose native country ignored his work,the
c.the works of Edgar Allan Poe,ignored in his native country,the
d.the works of Edgar Allan Poe, which were ignored in his native country,the
e.the works of Edgar Allan Poe having been ignored in his native country,the
Non underline part refers to Works of Hawthrone, therefore to avoid comparison error (comparing apples to oranges) we need to refer to works of Edgar. We are down to C, D and E.
Ignored does not clearly refer to Works of Edgar, there is ambiguity as to whether Ignored refers to Edgar or his works. C out.
E is just awful. usage of "having" is incorrect.
Reason why most people rule out D is that we have learned that comma which construction refers to the noun just before the comma. However, this understanding is only correct to an extent. comma which construction refers to the legitimate noun before the comma.
How do we decide which is the legitimate noun? The hint lies in the verb in the non underlined part. Here the verb is "were" A plural verb, hence which cannot refer to Edgar and refers to Works of Edgar. Answer D. Hope it helps.
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
Stacey Koprince
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2228
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pm
- Location: Montreal, Canada
- Thanked: 639 times
- Followed by:694 members
- GMAT Score:780
Received a PM asking me to respond and explain options C and D.
I'm looking for a source up above and can't find one. Can someone please cite the source (author) of the problem so that I can respond fully?
I'll discuss very generally:
"Unlike Mr. Smith, whose films were ignored in his native country, the films of..."
This sentence says that Mr. Smith's films were ignored in his native country.
"Unlike the films of Mr. Smith, ignored in his native country, the films of..."
What was ignored in this sentence? The films? Or Mr. Smith? I'm not sure. I know it's supposed to be the films, because that's what the original sentence said. Is there another option that is completely grammatically correct AND does not have this ambiguity?
Yes! "Unlike the films of Mr. Smith, which were ignored in his native country, the films of..."
The verb "were" is plural; it must match with "films," not "Mr. Smith." So the films were ignored... and that's what I want the sentence to say. There's nothing else wrong with this one, so this one is better than the other one that did have ambiguity.
I'm looking for a source up above and can't find one. Can someone please cite the source (author) of the problem so that I can respond fully?
I'll discuss very generally:
"Unlike Mr. Smith, whose films were ignored in his native country, the films of..."
This sentence says that Mr. Smith's films were ignored in his native country.
"Unlike the films of Mr. Smith, ignored in his native country, the films of..."
What was ignored in this sentence? The films? Or Mr. Smith? I'm not sure. I know it's supposed to be the films, because that's what the original sentence said. Is there another option that is completely grammatically correct AND does not have this ambiguity?
Yes! "Unlike the films of Mr. Smith, which were ignored in his native country, the films of..."
The verb "were" is plural; it must match with "films," not "Mr. Smith." So the films were ignored... and that's what I want the sentence to say. There's nothing else wrong with this one, so this one is better than the other one that did have ambiguity.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!
Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT
Contributor to Beat The GMAT!
Learn more about me
Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT
Contributor to Beat The GMAT!
Learn more about me
-
Erfun_GMATCompass
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 8:07 am
- Location: New York
- Thanked: 3 times
- GMAT Score:770
An important point to take away from Stacey's great explanation is that a relative pronoun (such as "who" and "which") does not ALWAYS have to modify the noun immediately preceding it. If there's a noun + prepositional phrase + relative clause, the relative clause could modify either the original noun or a noun in the prepositional phrase, depending on what logically makes sense.
For example: "The letters of Emily Dickinson, which are well-known for their eloquence..." Here, the relative clause "which are well-known" could only logically modify LETTERS, not EMILY DICKINSON. So, even though the noun immediately before "which" is "Emily Dickinson," it's obvious that the relative clause is modifying LETTERS and the sentence is thus not incorrect.
For example: "The letters of Emily Dickinson, which are well-known for their eloquence..." Here, the relative clause "which are well-known" could only logically modify LETTERS, not EMILY DICKINSON. So, even though the noun immediately before "which" is "Emily Dickinson," it's obvious that the relative clause is modifying LETTERS and the sentence is thus not incorrect.
Stacey Koprince wrote:Received a PM asking me to respond and explain options C and D.
I'm looking for a source up above and can't find one. Can someone please cite the source (author) of the problem so that I can respond fully?
I'll discuss very generally:
"Unlike Mr. Smith, whose films were ignored in his native country, the films of..."
This sentence says that Mr. Smith's films were ignored in his native country.
"Unlike the films of Mr. Smith, ignored in his native country, the films of..."
What was ignored in this sentence? The films? Or Mr. Smith? I'm not sure. I know it's supposed to be the films, because that's what the original sentence said. Is there another option that is completely grammatically correct AND does not have this ambiguity?
Yes! "Unlike the films of Mr. Smith, which were ignored in his native country, the films of..."
The verb "were" is plural; it must match with "films," not "Mr. Smith." So the films were ignored... and that's what I want the sentence to say. There's nothing else wrong with this one, so this one is better than the other one that did have ambiguity.
Erfun Geula
GMAT Compass
gmattutornyc.com/
gretutornyc.com/
Serious about helping you beat the GMAT!
GMAT Compass
gmattutornyc.com/
gretutornyc.com/
Serious about helping you beat the GMAT!
-
Erfun_GMATCompass
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 8:07 am
- Location: New York
- Thanked: 3 times
- GMAT Score:770
An important point to take away from Stacey's great explanation is that a relative pronoun (such as "who" and "which") does not ALWAYS have to modify the noun immediately preceding it. If there's a noun + prepositional phrase + relative clause, the relative clause could modify either the original noun or a noun in the prepositional phrase, depending on what logically makes sense.
For example: "The letters of Emily Dickinson, which are well-known for their eloquence..." Here, the relative clause "which are well-known" could only logically modify LETTERS, not EMILY DICKINSON. So, even though the noun immediately before "which" is "Emily Dickinson," it's obvious that the relative clause is modifying LETTERS and the sentence is thus not incorrect.
For example: "The letters of Emily Dickinson, which are well-known for their eloquence..." Here, the relative clause "which are well-known" could only logically modify LETTERS, not EMILY DICKINSON. So, even though the noun immediately before "which" is "Emily Dickinson," it's obvious that the relative clause is modifying LETTERS and the sentence is thus not incorrect.
Stacey Koprince wrote:Received a PM asking me to respond and explain options C and D.
I'm looking for a source up above and can't find one. Can someone please cite the source (author) of the problem so that I can respond fully?
I'll discuss very generally:
"Unlike Mr. Smith, whose films were ignored in his native country, the films of..."
This sentence says that Mr. Smith's films were ignored in his native country.
"Unlike the films of Mr. Smith, ignored in his native country, the films of..."
What was ignored in this sentence? The films? Or Mr. Smith? I'm not sure. I know it's supposed to be the films, because that's what the original sentence said. Is there another option that is completely grammatically correct AND does not have this ambiguity?
Yes! "Unlike the films of Mr. Smith, which were ignored in his native country, the films of..."
The verb "were" is plural; it must match with "films," not "Mr. Smith." So the films were ignored... and that's what I want the sentence to say. There's nothing else wrong with this one, so this one is better than the other one that did have ambiguity.
Erfun Geula
GMAT Compass
gmattutornyc.com/
gretutornyc.com/
Serious about helping you beat the GMAT!
GMAT Compass
gmattutornyc.com/
gretutornyc.com/
Serious about helping you beat the GMAT!
