Thanks Guru,
I was just trying to find that : is there anything wrong while saying 'its paying'.
After several years of rapid growth
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
Possessive pronoun + gerund is a legitimate construction, but it should be avoided on the GMAT. I would be very skeptical of an answer choice that uses this construction.paes wrote:Thanks Guru,
I was just trying to find that : is there anything wrong while saying 'its paying'.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:53 am
Thanks Guru but I have a doubt here-
The underlined part, I presume, is an independent clause which is joined to the main independent clause "the health care....metropolitan area". My doubt is that if we will not include the 'it' then the second independent clause will be missing a subject resulting in a fragment.
My second doubt is that you said that 'it' could refer back to 'the metropolitan area' but 'in the the metropolitan area' is a prepositional phase and time and again it has been reiterated on this very forum that it is very difficult for a pronoun to refer back to the object of preposition. Are there any exceptions to this? Under which case?
The underlined part, I presume, is an independent clause which is joined to the main independent clause "the health care....metropolitan area". My doubt is that if we will not include the 'it' then the second independent clause will be missing a subject resulting in a fragment.
My second doubt is that you said that 'it' could refer back to 'the metropolitan area' but 'in the the metropolitan area' is a prepositional phase and time and again it has been reiterated on this very forum that it is very difficult for a pronoun to refer back to the object of preposition. Are there any exceptions to this? Under which case?
GMATGuruNY wrote:Eliminate A and B because while doesn't imply contrast.kvcpk wrote:After several years of rapid growth, the health care company became one of the largest health care providers in the metropolitan area, while it then proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in its payment to doctors and hospitals.
A. while it then proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months
behind in its payment to
B. while it then proved unable to handle the increase in business and fell months
behind in its payment to
C. but then it proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind
in its paying
D. but then proving unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind
in paying
E. but then proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind
in paying
Source: GMATPREP
Please provide detailed explanations.
Eliminate D because proving needs to be in the same tense as became.
Eliminate C because the pronoun it could be referring either to the health care company or to the metropolitan area, since either could have proved unable to handle the increase in business. If it's not crystal clear which noun is being replaced by a pronoun, eliminate the answer choice. So C is out.
The correct answer is E.
I received a PM asking me to discuss the comma before the conjunction but. The GMAT doesn't really test punctuation. Look for better reasons to eliminate answer choices.
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
You are correct that -- viewed from a grammatical perspective -- it should refer to the subject of the previous clause. However, a reader might legitimately wonder whether the intended meaning is for it to refer to the metropolitan area, since it's entirely plausible that the metropolitan area proved unable to handle the increase in business. This potential confusion makes E a better answer choice because omitting the pronoun it makes the meaning in E crystal clear:Jai_itguys wrote:Thanks Guru but I have a doubt here-
The underlined part, I presume, is an independent clause which is joined to the main independent clause "the health care....metropolitan area". My doubt is that if we will not include the 'it' then the second independent clause will be missing a subject resulting in a fragment.
My second doubt is that you said that 'it' could refer back to 'the metropolitan area' but 'in the the metropolitan area' is a prepositional phase and time and again it has been reiterated on this very forum that it is very difficult for a pronoun to refer back to the object of preposition. Are there any exceptions to this? Under which case?
GMATGuruNY wrote:Eliminate A and B because while doesn't imply contrast.kvcpk wrote:After several years of rapid growth, the health care company became one of the largest health care providers in the metropolitan area, while it then proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in its payment to doctors and hospitals.
A. while it then proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months
behind in its payment to
B. while it then proved unable to handle the increase in business and fell months
behind in its payment to
C. but then it proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind
in its paying
D. but then proving unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind
in paying
E. but then proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind
in paying
Source: GMATPREP
Please provide detailed explanations.
Eliminate D because proving needs to be in the same tense as became.
Eliminate C because the pronoun it could be referring either to the health care company or to the metropolitan area, since either could have proved unable to handle the increase in business. If it's not crystal clear which noun is being replaced by a pronoun, eliminate the answer choice. So C is out.
The correct answer is E.
I received a PM asking me to discuss the comma before the conjunction but. The GMAT doesn't really test punctuation. Look for better reasons to eliminate answer choices.
...the health care company became one of the largest health care providers...but then proved unable to handle the increase in business...
The health care company is the subject both of became and of proved, so there is no sentence fragment error. (While traditional grammar holds that after a comma both a subject and a verb are required, modern grammar doesn't always adhere to this rule, and punctuation isn't really tested on the GMAT, so we shouldn't use this as a reason to eliminate E.)
Hope this helps.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pm
- Thanked: 18 times
- Followed by:2 members
E is wrong, C is correct. Pls, check OA. This is gmatprep questions, the official source of hard questions. take serious study.
in C, COMMA FAILING modifies IT PROVE UNABLE . This is correct
in E, COMMA FAILING modifies COMPANY BECOME AND PROVE UNABLE. This is incorrect.
in C, COMMA FAILING modifies IT PROVE UNABLE . This is correct
in E, COMMA FAILING modifies COMPANY BECOME AND PROVE UNABLE. This is incorrect.
Hope u guys don't mind reopening this old thread.GMATGuruNY wrote: You are correct that -- viewed from a grammatical perspective -- it should refer to the subject of the previous clause. However, a reader might legitimately wonder whether the intended meaning is for it to refer to the metropolitan area, since it's entirely plausible that the metropolitan area proved unable to handle the increase in business. This potential confusion makes E a better answer choice because omitting the pronoun it makes the meaning in E crystal clear:
...the health care company became one of the largest health care providers...but then proved unable to handle the increase in business...
The health care company is the subject both of became and of proved, so there is no sentence fragment error. (While traditional grammar holds that after a comma both a subject and a verb are required, modern grammar doesn't always adhere to this rule, and punctuation isn't really tested on the GMAT, so we shouldn't use this as a reason to eliminate E.)
Hope this helps.
@GMATGuruNY: Can u please help me understand when can i omit the subject of IC starting with but and when not to omit it.
Harry became minister of the State but did not carried out his promises.
Is this correct..can I omit the subject for all FANBOYS(for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so), which are used for combing independent clauses.
Start and don't stop the work till you get 700+
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pm
- Thanked: 18 times
- Followed by:2 members
In C, "It" must refer toy "company" because the second clause is parallel to the fist clause and by default, "it" must refer to "company" and the sentence C is correct at this point.
C can be wrong because "it" is considerered redundant. This redundance is considered an errors many times on og questions ( I am sure of this, but can not remember what question in og)
but in some cases, this redundance appears in the correct answer because when the distance between the first subject and "it" is long, the repeatation is neccessary.
Pls, comment,confirm.
C can be wrong because "it" is considerered redundant. This redundance is considered an errors many times on og questions ( I am sure of this, but can not remember what question in og)
but in some cases, this redundance appears in the correct answer because when the distance between the first subject and "it" is long, the repeatation is neccessary.
Pls, comment,confirm.
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 11:10 am
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 8:53 am
- Thanked: 1 times
Both C and E seem correct. However, I will select E over C basis wordiness.
'its paying' makes the option more wordy than option E.
'its paying' makes the option more wordy than option E.
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 11:10 am
but what about E being a run-on sentene?pallav.gmat wrote:Both C and E seem correct. However, I will select E over C basis wordiness.
'its paying' makes the option more wordy than option E.
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 8:53 am
- Thanked: 1 times
I dont think it to be a run-on , can you explain the context behind the thought?abhishek07sep wrote:but what about E being a run-on sentene?pallav.gmat wrote:Both C and E seem correct. However, I will select E over C basis wordiness.
'its paying' makes the option more wordy than option E.
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 11:10 am
i like apples , and oranges..pallav.gmat wrote:I dont think it to be a run-on , can you explain the context behind the thought?abhishek07sep wrote:but what about E being a run-on sentene?pallav.gmat wrote:Both C and E seem correct. However, I will select E over C basis wordiness.
'its paying' makes the option more wordy than option E.
the above sentence is wrong , i guess
the correct sentence should be-
i like apples and oranges..
for the exact same reason i think that e is a run on
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pm
- Thanked: 18 times
- Followed by:2 members
"its paying" in C is wrong. This point is discussed many times on Manhantanforum, but not properly explained.
we should not use possessive pronoun before doing (paying) when there is a noun (payment).
I am not clear of this problem. experts, members, pls, explain.
we should not use possessive pronoun before doing (paying) when there is a noun (payment).
I am not clear of this problem. experts, members, pls, explain.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pm
- Thanked: 18 times
- Followed by:2 members
I think that C is wrong becuase both "it" and "its" are considered reduandant.
possessive pronoun+ doing is considered correct in many og questions
I like his leaning gmat
is correct sentence
possessive pronoun+ doing is considered correct in many og questions
I like his leaning gmat
is correct sentence