Critical Reasoning

A year after the start an experiment to decrease crime in two high-crime subway stations by the installation of closed-circuit televisions, the experiment is being discontinued, city officials say the program has led to an increase in crime, citing the fact that following the installation, both stations showed increases in the number of crimes reported.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the claim of the city officials that the program has led to an increase in crime?

(A) The two subway stations had been chosen on the basis subway stations was higher than that of other high-crime subway stations not equipped with closed-circuit-television.

(B) The rate of increase in crimes reported for two subway stations was higher than that of other high-crime subway stations not equipped with closed-circuit television.

(C) The percentage of all crimes committed at the two subway stations that were reported rose as a result of increased instances of observations of crime on the closed-circuit televisions.

(D) The year in which the experiment was conducted was a year in which the total number of crimes reported in the city fell.

(E) Closed-circuit televisions installed in shops and stores throughout the city have proved to be useful in the prevention of shoplifting and burglaries.

IMO [spoiler](C)[/spoiler]

It shows that even though crime increased, it was because there were more crimes being reported no as a result of the CCTVs being installed which helped more crimes get reported, it was something I had paraphrased and looked for after I read the question stem.......let me know if I'm mistaken.

https://www.beatthegmat.com/closed-circu ... 37704.html

Please use search

it has to be C.

It has to be C

A) The two subway stations had been chosen on the basis subway stations was higher than that of other high-crime subway stations not equipped with closed-circuit-television----This is not addressing on increase in crime with installation of CCTV. So not valid

(B) The rate of increase in crimes reported for two subway stations was higher than that of other high-crime subway stations not equipped with closed-circuit television. -----Not valid

(C) The percentage of all crimes committed at the two subway stations that were reported rose as a result of increased instances of observations of crime on the closed-circuit televisions. ---This argument clearly indicates how installation of CCTV has impacted the increase in crime rate.

(D) The year in which the experiment was conducted was a year in which the total number of crimes reported in the city fell. -This is in no way weakening the argument

(E) Closed-circuit televisions installed in shops and stores throughout the city have proved to be useful in the prevention of shoplifting and burglaries.---This is out of scope

IMO, C.

Looking at it now, C makes sense