Researchers in Germany have unearthed 400,000-year-old wooden spears from what it appears was an ancient
lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who systematically hunted big game much
earlier than believed.
(A) it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who
(B) it appears had been an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and is stunning evidence that human ancestors
(C) it appears to have been an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and is stunning evidence that human ancestors
(D) appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence that human ancestors
(E) appears that it is an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence of human ancestors who
my query - how to distinguish ABC with DE?
5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
Researchers in Germany have unearthed 400,000-year-old woode
This topic has expert replies
-
Ben.Miller@ApexGMAT
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:14 am
- Location: Global
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:2 members
- GMAT Score:790
Distinguishing ABC from DE hinges on the "from what [it] appears". The question is whether or not the 'it' is necessary. While there is a grammatical issue, this is very much a word choice/phrasing issue as well and to determine this most easily one could rely on their ear, but only if you're a native speaker.
The easiest way to determine whether the 'it' belongs is simply to ask "What does 'it' refer to?" As a pronoun, it needs to refer to something specific, and usually that preceeds the use of the 'it'. Here, we can't pinpoint the subject of the 'it'. 'It' doesn't refer to Researchers, Germany, or wooden spears.
On the flip side, "what appears" is a functional clause, in the same way that "what looked like" or "what was thought to be" is used. 'what [verb group] [comparison]'.
Ben
The easiest way to determine whether the 'it' belongs is simply to ask "What does 'it' refer to?" As a pronoun, it needs to refer to something specific, and usually that preceeds the use of the 'it'. Here, we can't pinpoint the subject of the 'it'. 'It' doesn't refer to Researchers, Germany, or wooden spears.
On the flip side, "what appears" is a functional clause, in the same way that "what looked like" or "what was thought to be" is used. 'what [verb group] [comparison]'.
Ben
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
ceilidh.erickson
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
- Thanked: 1443 times
- Followed by:247 members
Adding to what Ben has said...
The GMAT seems to be trying to trick us into thinking that "it appears" is correct, because it's a commonly used expression on its own. "It appears to be raining outside," "it appears that they are running late," etc. We can't use both "what" and "it" in the same expression, though.
In colloquial English expressions, we often use "it" to refer to general states of being: "it's sunny," "it was a shame that you couldn't come," etc. In these examples, "it" doesn't replace a specific noun, but refers to a general situation. Although these are perfectly correct constructions, the GMAT tends not to use "it" in this way. When you see "it" on the GMAT, it should refer to a specific antecedent clearly defined in the sentence. (There may be a handful of exceptions, but this is almost always the case).
The correct idiomatic usage of "appears" is either "something appears to be" or, more colloquially, "it appears that something is/was..." For this reason, A, B, and E are not idiomatically correct.
The GMAT seems to be trying to trick us into thinking that "it appears" is correct, because it's a commonly used expression on its own. "It appears to be raining outside," "it appears that they are running late," etc. We can't use both "what" and "it" in the same expression, though.
In colloquial English expressions, we often use "it" to refer to general states of being: "it's sunny," "it was a shame that you couldn't come," etc. In these examples, "it" doesn't replace a specific noun, but refers to a general situation. Although these are perfectly correct constructions, the GMAT tends not to use "it" in this way. When you see "it" on the GMAT, it should refer to a specific antecedent clearly defined in the sentence. (There may be a handful of exceptions, but this is almost always the case).
The correct idiomatic usage of "appears" is either "something appears to be" or, more colloquially, "it appears that something is/was..." For this reason, A, B, and E are not idiomatically correct.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
-
sidmaru123
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 10:05 pm
-
gmat_for_life
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 7:43 am
Hi Ceilidh,
Could you please explain why 'comma'+-ing is not an issue with option D? Ideally, a comma+ing is used when the action is a result of the part before the comma. Am I missing anything here?
Many thanks,
Amit
Could you please explain why 'comma'+-ing is not an issue with option D? Ideally, a comma+ing is used when the action is a result of the part before the comma. Am I missing anything here?
Many thanks,
Amit
-
GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
One definition of to stun is to shock.gmat_for_life wrote:Hi Ceilidh,
Could you please explain why 'comma'+-ing is not an issue with option D? Ideally, a comma+ing is used when the action is a result of the part before the comma. Am I missing anything here?
Many thanks,
Amit
D: Researchers in Germany have unearthed 400,000-year-old wooden spears from what appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence that human ancestors systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed.
Here, stunning is not a COMMA + VERBing modifier serving to refer to the subject of the preceding clause.
Rather, stunning is simply an adjective serving to modify evidence.
What KIND of evidence?
STUNNING evidence.
In other words, evidence that can be described as SHOCKING.
The intended meaning is clear from context.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
