A 1972 agreement between Canada - SC question

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 47
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 2:34 pm
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:1 members

A 1972 agreement between Canada - SC question

by anks17 » Sat Nov 19, 2011 10:45 am
74. A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United
States reduced the amount of phosphates that
municipalities had been allowed to dump
into the
Great Lakes.
(A) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump
(B) reduced the phosphate amount that municipalities had been dumping
(C) reduces the phosphate amount municipalities have been allowed to dump
(D) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities are allowed to dump
(E) reduces the amount of phosphates allowed for dumping by municipalities

Answer can be either A or D as both seem correct. Can anyone or any Expert please explain and confirm the correct answer ?
"doesn't matter ver u r...ur destiny depends upon vho u choose 2 b!!!!"

Legendary Member
Posts: 784
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 3:51 am
Thanked: 114 times
Followed by:12 members

by patanjali.purpose » Sat Nov 19, 2011 11:38 am
anks17 wrote:74. A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United
States reduced the amount of phosphates that
municipalities had been allowed to dump
into the
Great Lakes.
(A) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump
(B) reduced the phosphate amount that municipalities had been dumping
(C) reduces the phosphate amount municipalities have been allowed to dump
(D) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities are allowed to dump
(E) reduces the amount of phosphates allowed for dumping by municipalities

Answer can be either A or D as both seem correct. Can anyone or any Expert please explain and confirm the correct answer ?
HAD BEEN ALLOWED implies the dumping activity happened before the agreement REDUCED the amount of phos. This does not make sense - someone will reduce the amount only when the dumping activity is happening at that point in time. This calls for usage of either present simple or present perfect - C or D. But C has another problem (REDUCES) - simple present not used for past activity. Therefore IMO D

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 47
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 2:34 pm
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:1 members

by anks17 » Sat Nov 19, 2011 12:03 pm
Right , but can't we analyse as below:-

More Dumping was happening before agreement was passed and only after agreement was passed, dumping amount was reduced. Thus, for a prior past action i.e. more dumping which was hapeening before, past perfect is required.
"doesn't matter ver u r...ur destiny depends upon vho u choose 2 b!!!!"

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 516
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 3:22 pm
Thanked: 112 times
Followed by:13 members

by smackmartine » Sat Nov 19, 2011 7:10 pm
anks17 wrote:Right , but can't we analyse as below:-

More Dumping was happening before agreement was passed and only after agreement was passed, dumping amount was reduced. Thus, for a prior past action i.e. more dumping which was hapeening before, past perfect is required.
Hi anks17,

I would again reiterate Ron's words : Sentences, testing Tenses are 100% based on MEANING and 0% GRAMMAR.

Note that the dumping has not stopped. It has only reduced. That means municipalities are sill allowed to dump into the Great Lakes. Hence, D is correct.

Let me know if the explanation didn't help.
Smack is Back ...
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)