Hi there
Is the below sentence correct? ....If the 'there' and 'is' trade places, would the new sentence still make sense and convey the same meaning?
";nor is there a system to ensure that the interception of information is logged."
Regards
5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
nor is there/there is
This topic has expert replies
-
Chinn_asama
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2012 7:14 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
-
Jim@StratusPrep
- MBA Admissions Consultant
- Posts: 2279
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 7:51 am
- Location: New York
- Thanked: 660 times
- Followed by:266 members
- GMAT Score:770
Yes, the sentence is correct as is, and no it would not be grammatically correct. I am guessing a bit here, but the clue is in the parallelism with the remainder of the sentence. Whatever comes after 'neither' must be in parallel to what comes after 'nor'.
GMAT Answers provides a world class adaptive learning platform.
-- Push button course navigation to simplify planning
-- Daily assignments to fit your exam timeline
-- Organized review that is tailored based on your abiility
-- 1,000s of unique GMAT questions
-- 100s of handwritten 'digital flip books' for OG questions
-- 100% Free Trial and less than $20 per month after.
-- Free GMAT Quantitative Review
-- Push button course navigation to simplify planning
-- Daily assignments to fit your exam timeline
-- Organized review that is tailored based on your abiility
-- 1,000s of unique GMAT questions
-- 100s of handwritten 'digital flip books' for OG questions
-- 100% Free Trial and less than $20 per month after.
-- Free GMAT Quantitative Review
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
ceilidh.erickson
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
- Thanked: 1443 times
- Followed by:247 members
This is an idiomatic rule with "nor" when it's used to connect two independent clauses. We could say:
There is no food. Also, there is no water.
Alternatively, we could connect these with "nor":
There is no food; nor is there water.
For whatever reason, the subject and verb are inverted in this construction (much like they would be in a question). It would not be correct to use normal subject-verb order here.
Jim is incorrect about the use of "neither," though. In such a construction, when "nor" follows a semicolon, there is no "neither" in the preceding clause. We could (arcanely) say:
Neither is there food nor is there water.
In that case, though, we would not use a semicolon.
There is no food. Also, there is no water.
Alternatively, we could connect these with "nor":
There is no food; nor is there water.
For whatever reason, the subject and verb are inverted in this construction (much like they would be in a question). It would not be correct to use normal subject-verb order here.
Jim is incorrect about the use of "neither," though. In such a construction, when "nor" follows a semicolon, there is no "neither" in the preceding clause. We could (arcanely) say:
Neither is there food nor is there water.
In that case, though, we would not use a semicolon.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
