Your understanding seems correct.RBBmba@2014 wrote:NOT able to understand this!GMATGuruNY wrote: A -> B does not imply that Not A -> Not B.
GENERALLY, in a GMAT STRENGTHEN CR, if we've A caused B or A has led to B or If A then B, then any answer choice that indicates If NOT A then NOT B,should be a potential STRENGTHENER, I guess. (because MUST BE TRUE aspect doesn't hold true in a STRENGTHEN CR)
Am I correct ?
Argument:
In a study, it was found that most daily news-watchers suffer from depression.
Clearly, watching the daily news causes people to suffer from depression.
The following is a valid strengthener:
When daily news-watchers stop watching the daily news, their depression disappears.
To sum up:
A --> B does not imply that Not A --> Not B.
If we are told that daily news-watching causes depression, we cannot conclude that people who avoid the daily news are happy.
However, if an argument concludes that A --> B, this conclusion can be strengthened by showing that Not A --> Not B.
If an argument concludes that daily news-watching causes depression, this conclusion can be strengthened by showing that avoiding the daily news causes the depression to disappear.