BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

two very tough sc from gmat prep

Expert replies
by varun007 » Mon Sep 01, 2008 11:50 pm
With cloning technology, scientists are approaching what has long been the ultimate goal of modern husbandry: achieving a consistency of quality and production in farm animals as once thought to be limited to manufactured goods.
(A) achieving a consistency of quality and production in farm animals as once thought to be
(B) achieving farm animals with a consistency of quality and production as were once thought of as
(C) achieving in farm animals a consistency of quality and production that was once thought to be
(D) achievement of farm animals whose consistency of quality and production are the same as what were once thought to he
(E) achievement of farm animals at a consistency of quality and production once thought of as 23

OA IS C PLS CAN U EXPLAIN

The Immigration Service now has the discretionary power to keep families united even though all their members do not meet the five-year residency requirement.
(A) all their members do not meet the five-year residency requirement
(B) not all their members meet the five-year residency requirement
(C) all their members have not met the requirement for a five-year residency
(D) not all their members have resided for five years, a requirement
(E) all their members have not resided for five years, as required

OA IS B PLS CAN U EXPLAIN

pls can somebody explain in detail
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by nitin86 » Thu Sep 04, 2008 7:06 am
In First Question

D/E incorrect, because "achievement OF..." wrong construction
B - "as WERE once thought..." wrong construction
A - "acheiving" is incorrectly modifying "consistency and production" instead of modifying "animals".

COrrect B - "acheiving in farm animals...consistency of quality and production..."

acheiving correctly modifies "farm animals"

In second question,

B seems best option
Join the discussion

by Vignesh.4384 » Thu Sep 04, 2008 7:25 am
nitin86 wrote:In First Question

D/E incorrect, because "achievement OF..." wrong construction
B - "as WERE once thought..." wrong construction
A - "acheiving" is incorrectly modifying "consistency and production" instead of modifying "animals".

COrrect B - "acheiving in farm animals...consistency of quality and production..."

acheiving correctly modifies "farm animals"

In second question,

B seems best option
For the first question "as" is not correct. it changes the meaning.
"that is necessary to create a sub clause
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1