Q. A mixture of poems and short fiction, Jean Toomer’s Cane has been called one of the three best novels ever written by (Black Americans—the others being Richard Wright, author of Native Son, and Ralph Ellison, author of Invisible Man.)
A) Black Americans—the others being Richard Wright, author of Native Son, and Ralph Ellison, author of Invisible Man
B) Black Americans—including Native Son by Richard Wright and Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison
C) a Black American—including Richard Wright, author of Native Son, and Ralph Ellison, author of Invisible Man
D) a Black American—the others being Richard Wright, author of Native Son, and Ralph Ellison, author of Invisible Man
E) a Black American—the others being Richard Wright’s Native Son and Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man
The answer is E...but I'm really confused since B is also attractivre enough. What do you guys think?
1 SC question!
This topic has expert replies
- blue_lotus
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:22 am
- Thanked: 7 times
To maintain parallelism with all the three novels,
Jean Toomer’s Cane is parallel with Richard Wright’s Native Son and Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man . Only option E has this
Before that the novel is the best written by 1 black american and not
black americans .
This narrows dow the answer choices to c,d and e
both option c and d are wordy
The best option therefore is only E as explained above.
Jean Toomer’s Cane is parallel with Richard Wright’s Native Son and Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man . Only option E has this
Before that the novel is the best written by 1 black american and not
black americans .
This narrows dow the answer choices to c,d and e
both option c and d are wordy
The best option therefore is only E as explained above.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
'including' is a problem as well, for two reasons:
1 - the sentence gives an exhaustive list, so 'including' is inappropriate. 'including' is only appropriate in sentences giving a PARTIAL list; complete lists are prefaced by other words, such as 'namely'.
2 - from a purely grammatical standpoint, the sentence is ambiguous: according to the usual interpretation of participial modifiers, it allows the possibility that Cane itself includes the other two books mentioned. (this interpretation is of course ridiculous, but the meaning of a sentence must be grammatically unique without appealing to common sense.)
1 - the sentence gives an exhaustive list, so 'including' is inappropriate. 'including' is only appropriate in sentences giving a PARTIAL list; complete lists are prefaced by other words, such as 'namely'.
2 - from a purely grammatical standpoint, the sentence is ambiguous: according to the usual interpretation of participial modifiers, it allows the possibility that Cane itself includes the other two books mentioned. (this interpretation is of course ridiculous, but the meaning of a sentence must be grammatically unique without appealing to common sense.)
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 377
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:30 am
- Thanked: 15 times
- Followed by:2 members
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 11:00 am
- Location: USA
- Thanked: 6 times
- Followed by:1 members
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 833
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:56 am
- Thanked: 13 times
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 594
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 11:51 pm
- Thanked: 12 times
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 594
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 11:51 pm
- Thanked: 12 times
can some one clarify if B or E is the correct answer...
this problem is in GMAt sets ... and the answer given is B
But this post and Gmat instructor "lunarpower" mentions it as B is incorrect
IMO E should be the answer....
Can our experts comment on it....
Thanks
this problem is in GMAt sets ... and the answer given is B
But this post and Gmat instructor "lunarpower" mentions it as B is incorrect
IMO E should be the answer....
Can our experts comment on it....
Thanks
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 2:22 am
- Location: hyderabad
yeah "b" must be correct....
Jean Toomer’s Cane has been called one of the three best novels ever written by Black Americans...
here black americans refers to three novels rather then best one out of them..
a single american can't write three best novel(rather then in exception case).
..
though "b"is not parellel but it doesn't changes the actual meaning of sentence....
indeed a very good question..
Jean Toomer’s Cane has been called one of the three best novels ever written by Black Americans...
here black americans refers to three novels rather then best one out of them..
a single american can't write three best novel(rather then in exception case).
..
though "b"is not parellel but it doesn't changes the actual meaning of sentence....
indeed a very good question..
rahul
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 7:39 am
Can you please give an example for partial list
lunarpower wrote:'including' is a problem as well, for two reasons:
1 - the sentence gives an exhaustive list, so 'including' is inappropriate. 'including' is only appropriate in sentences giving a PARTIAL list; complete lists are prefaced by other words, such as 'namely'.
2 - from a purely grammatical standpoint, the sentence is ambiguous: according to the usual interpretation of participial modifiers, it allows the possibility that Cane itself includes the other two books mentioned. (this interpretation is of course ridiculous, but the meaning of a sentence must be grammatically unique without appealing to common sense.)