xy

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 185
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 3:06 am
Thanked: 6 times

xy

by gmatnmein2010 » Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:00 pm
If xy ≠ 0, is x > y?

(1) 4x = 3y

(2) |y - x| = x - y

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1275
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 11:13 pm
Location: Arabian Sea
Thanked: 125 times
Followed by:2 members

by ajith » Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:59 pm
gmatnmein2010 wrote:If xy ≠ 0, is x > y?

(1) 4x = 3y

(2) |y - x| = x - y
1) is not sufficient (when x is -ve x>y and when x is positive x<y)


2) |y - x| = x - y => x-y is positive x>y
Sufficient
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1560
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:38 am
Thanked: 137 times
Followed by:5 members

by thephoenix » Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:26 pm
gmatnmein2010 wrote:If xy ≠ 0, is x > y?

(1) 4x = 3y

(2) |y - x| = x - y
s1) not suff

for +ve x and +ve eqn of s1)------->x<y &
for -ve value of x and y------>x>y

s2)This means that equation |y-x|=x-y holds true when x-y>=0

bcoz ly-xl is a +ve entity

so x>=y not suff

(1)+(2) From (1) we got that x#y and from (2) x>=y , hence x>y. Sufficient.

IMO C

Legendary Member
Posts: 941
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 12:28 am
Thanked: 20 times
Followed by:1 members

by bhumika.k.shah » Sat Feb 20, 2010 12:58 am
1.)4x = 3y

If x = 3 and y = 4
then we get an answer NO for is x>y

If x=-3 and y = -4
then we get an answer YES for is x >y

hence statement 1 is sufficient.

2.)|y - x| = x - y
only when x is greater than y is this possible.

Hence B

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1132
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:38 am
Location: India
Thanked: 64 times
Followed by:6 members
GMAT Score:760

by harsh.champ » Sat Feb 20, 2010 6:25 am
bhumika.k.shah wrote:1.)4x = 3y

If x = 3 and y = 4
then we get an answer NO for is x>y

If x=-3 and y = -4
then we get an answer YES for is x >y

hence statement 1 is sufficient.

2.)|y - x| = x - y
only when x is greater than y is this possible.


Hence B
Hey bhumika,
I think you missed the case when (x-y) = 0
In that case also,|y - x| will be equal to x - y as |0| = 0.
Hence,x can be => y but we cannot surely say if it is not equal.
Hence,St. B would be insufficient.

I would go with C over here.
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)



Just because something is hard doesn't mean you shouldn't try,it means you should just try harder.

"Keep Walking" - Johnny Walker :P

Legendary Member
Posts: 941
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 12:28 am
Thanked: 20 times
Followed by:1 members

by bhumika.k.shah » Sat Feb 20, 2010 10:17 am
whats the OA ?

if thts the case , then whats the purpose of giving xy is not equal to 0 in the question ?

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1022
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:49 pm
Location: Gandhinagar
Thanked: 41 times
Followed by:2 members

by shashank.ism » Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:46 am
gmatnmein2010 wrote:If xy ≠ 0, is x > y?

(1) 4x = 3y

(2) |y - x| = x - y

St.1 : 4x=3y --> x= 3/4 y for +ve y x<y but for -ve y x>y not sufficient
St.2: |y - x| = x - y --> y-x <=0 --> x>=y not sufficient

combined : x=y case is removed====sufficient

Ans C
My Websites:
www.mba.webmaggu.com - India's social Network for MBA Aspirants

www.deal.webmaggu.com -India's online discount, coupon, free stuff informer.

www.dictionary.webmaggu.com - A compact free online dictionary with images.

Nothing is Impossible, even Impossible says I'm possible.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 194
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 5:18 am
Thanked: 2 times

by girish3131 » Tue Mar 09, 2010 3:55 am
..
Last edited by girish3131 on Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:22 am, edited 1 time in total.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 194
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 5:18 am
Thanked: 2 times

by girish3131 » Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:01 am