• 5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Get 300+ Practice Questions

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 1 Hour Free
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5 Day FREE Trial
Study Smarter, Not Harder

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to \$200

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Trial & Practice Exam
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Practice Test & Review
How would you score if you took the GMAT

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

## with, without, nor, or... Hope experts can explain..

This topic has 1 expert reply and 6 member replies
rx_11 Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
17 May 2010
Posted:
87 messages
Thanked:
7 times
Target GMAT Score:
800
GMAT Score:
690

#### with, without, nor, or... Hope experts can explain..

Sun Nov 28, 2010 5:00 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
• Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
In the early part of the twentieth century, many vacationers found that driving automobiles and sleeping in tents allowed them to enjoy nature close at hand and tour at their own pace, with none of the restrictions of passenger trains and railroad timetables or with the formalities, expenses, and impersonality of hotels.

A. with none of the restrictions of passenger trains and railroad timetables or with the
B. with none of the restrictions of passenger trains, railroad timetables, nor
C. without the restrictions of passenger trains and railroad timetables nor
D. without the restrictions of passenger trains and railroad timetables or with the
E. without the restrictions of passenger trains and railroad timetables or the

Hi, everyone,

Totally stucked at this question.

Anyone can give the correct answer and do some explanations?

Cheers.

Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
gmat_perfect Legendary Member
Joined
24 Feb 2010
Posted:
1083 messages
Followed by:
13 members
Thanked:
126 times
Sun Nov 28, 2010 6:27 am
rx_11 wrote:
In the early part of the twentieth century, many vacationers found that driving automobiles and sleeping in tents allowed them to enjoy nature close at hand and tour at their own pace, with none of the restrictions of passenger trains and railroad timetables or with the formalities, expenses, and impersonality of hotels.

A. with none of the restrictions of passenger trains and railroad timetables or with the
B. with none of the restrictions of passenger trains, railroad timetables, nor
C. without the restrictions of passenger trains and railroad timetables nor
D. without the restrictions of passenger trains and railroad timetables or with the
E. without the restrictions of passenger trains and railroad timetables or the

Hi, everyone,
Totally stucked at this question.
Anyone can give the correct answer and do some explanations?
Cheers.
Skeleton of the sentence:
Driving automobiles and sleeping allowed them to enjoy nature, with X or with Y.

--> it means that "driving and sleeping have X and Y."

The issues:

Subject + Verb + Object, With X.

--> "With X" modifies the subject of the previous clause.

==> This kills A, B, and D.

2. With X or Y is the correct idiom.

==> This kills C.

Thanked by: rx_11
vishalj Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
18 Mar 2007
Posted:
104 messages
Thanked:
4 times
Test Date:
01/01/2011
Target GMAT Score:
750
Mon Nov 29, 2010 12:00 am
A. with none of the restrictions of passenger trains and railroad timetables or with the
B. with none of the restrictions of passenger trains, railroad timetables, nor ( Out....comma introduces modifier issue)
C. without the restrictions of passenger trains and railroad timetables nor (Out...illogically saying "nor the restrictions of formalities..."; also, nor is not required with "without"...double negation or redundancy)
D. without the restrictions of passenger trains and railroad timetables or with the
E. without the restrictions of passenger trains and railroad timetables or the (change the meaning of the sentence. The vacationers enjoy nature without the restrictions of passenger trains and railroad timetables or with the formalities...)

According to me, both A and D are same. The "with and without" prepositional phrase acts as a adverbial modifier. For the sake of concise structure, I will go with D.

Deepthi Subbu Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
16 Feb 2010
Posted:
298 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Thanked:
2 times
Mon Nov 29, 2010 12:35 am
Even I go with D.

Whats the OA?

### GMAT/MBA Expert

Amit@EconomistGMAT GMAT Instructor
Joined
12 Sep 2010
Posted:
23 messages
Followed by:
7 members
Thanked:
10 times
Mon Nov 29, 2010 12:39 am
This is a classic question for vertical elimination.

Scan the first words of the answer choices: "with none of" vs. "without". "Without" wins the conciseness category, but both mean the same and are grammatically correct, so we leave this detail to help us decide between answer choices later, if necessary.

Next, the phrase "the restrictions of passenger trains" repeats in all answer choices. No eliminations.

Next, B omits the "and" from "and railroad timetables". This causes an list of "A, B, nor (X, Y, and Z)." While this division is as ugly as hell and doesn't quite match the sentence logic (it makes better sense to separate into a train list and a hotel list), it is still grammatically correct. However, it dramatically reduces B's chances.

Finally the last part offers three options:
B and C end with "nor" but omit the "the", creating the structure "without the X nor Y" / "with none of the X nor Y". To be parallel, it should be "without the X nor the Y." Eliminate B and C.
A and D end with "or with the", creating the structure "(without the X) or (with the Y)" or "(with none of the X) or (with the Y)". This reinsertion of "with" makes the parallelism include the former "with"/"without" and creates a readability and meaning issue. It makes it look like the vacationers will either travel without trains or they will travel with hotel accomodation. This disagrees with the logic of the sentence. Eliminate A and D.
E ends with "or the", creating "without the X or the Y". Parallel and grammatically correct - this is the correct answer choice.

_________________
Amit Moshe
Verbal Section Instructor
Economist GMAT

Free 7-Day Test Prep with Economist GMAT Tutor - Receive free access to the top-rated GMAT prep course including a 1-on-1 strategy session, 2 full-length tests, and 5 ask-a-tutor messages. Get started now.
rx_11 Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
17 May 2010
Posted:
87 messages
Thanked:
7 times
Target GMAT Score:
800
GMAT Score:
690
Mon Nov 29, 2010 12:49 am
Amit@MasterGMAT wrote:
This is a classic question for vertical elimination.

Scan the first words of the answer choices: "with none of" vs. "without". "Without" wins the conciseness category, but both mean the same and are grammatically correct, so we leave this detail to help us decide between answer choices later, if necessary.

Next, the phrase "the restrictions of passenger trains" repeats in all answer choices. No eliminations.

Next, B omits the "and" from "and railroad timetables". This causes an list of "A, B, nor (X, Y, and Z)." While this division is as ugly as hell and doesn't quite match the sentence logic (it makes better sense to separate into a train list and a hotel list), it is still grammatically correct. However, it dramatically reduces B's chances.

Finally the last part offers three options:
B and C end with "nor" but omit the "the", creating the structure "without the X nor Y" / "with none of the X nor Y". To be parallel, it should be "without the X nor the Y." Eliminate B and C.
A and D end with "or with the", creating the structure "(without the X) or (with the Y)" or "(with none of the X) or (with the Y)". This reinsertion of "with" makes the parallelism include the former "with"/"without" and creates a readability and meaning issue. It makes it look like the vacationers will either travel without trains or they will travel with hotel accomodation. This disagrees with the logic of the sentence. Eliminate A and D.
E ends with "or the", creating "without the X or the Y". Parallel and grammatically correct - this is the correct answer choice.
Thanks Amit, got it!
The OA is E

gmat_perfect Legendary Member
Joined
24 Feb 2010
Posted:
1083 messages
Followed by:
13 members
Thanked:
126 times
Mon Nov 29, 2010 1:12 am
vishalj wrote:
A. with none of the restrictions of passenger trains and railroad timetables or with the
B. with none of the restrictions of passenger trains, railroad timetables, nor ( Out....comma introduces modifier issue)
C. without the restrictions of passenger trains and railroad timetables nor (Out...illogically saying "nor the restrictions of formalities..."; also, nor is not required with "without"...double negation or redundancy)
D. without the restrictions of passenger trains and railroad timetables or with the
E. without the restrictions of passenger trains and railroad timetables or the (change the meaning of the sentence. The vacationers enjoy nature without the restrictions of passenger trains and railroad timetables or with the formalities...)

According to me, both A and D are same. The "with and without" prepositional phrase acts as a adverbial modifier. For the sake of concise structure, I will go with D.
In the option D, you missed one thing.

Driving automobiles and sleeping in tents allowed them to enjoy nature close at hand and tour at their own pace, with none of the restrictions of passenger trains and railroad timetables or with the formalities, expenses, and impersonality of hotels.

D. without the restrictions of passenger trains and railroad timetables or with the

I have been allowed to do something, without X or with Y.

If "COMMA + VERBING" is an adverbial modifier, then it modifies the preceding clause; therefore, it retains the subject of the preceding clause.

Drop the 'without X".

Then we get.

I have been allowed to do something, with Y.

--> Meaning that I have Y.

D is faulty.

vishalj Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
18 Mar 2007
Posted:
104 messages
Thanked:
4 times
Test Date:
01/01/2011
Target GMAT Score:
750
Mon Nov 29, 2010 1:47 pm
Thanks guys....

### Best Conversation Starters

1 Vincen 180 topics
2 lheiannie07 61 topics
3 Roland2rule 54 topics
4 ardz24 44 topics
5 VJesus12 14 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

### Most Active Experts

1 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

155 posts
2 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

105 posts
3 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

101 posts
4 Jay@ManhattanReview

Manhattan Review

82 posts
5 Matt@VeritasPrep

Veritas Prep

80 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts