Manchester United

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1132
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:38 am
Location: India
Thanked: 64 times
Followed by:6 members
GMAT Score:760

Manchester United

by harsh.champ » Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:37 pm
In a football match, at the half-time, Manchester United was trailing by three goals. Did it win the match?


A. In the second-half Manchester United scored four goals.

B. The opponent scored four goals in the match.
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)



Just because something is hard doesn't mean you shouldn't try,it means you should just try harder.

"Keep Walking" - Johnny Walker :P

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1022
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:49 pm
Location: Gandhinagar
Thanked: 41 times
Followed by:2 members

by shashank.ism » Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:40 pm
harsh.champ wrote:In a football match, at the half-time, Manchester United was trailing by three goals. Did it win the match?


A. In the second-half Manchester United scored four goals.

B. The opponent scored four goals in the match.
A is insufficient - we don't know how many goals opponents scored in 2nd half.
B is insufficient - we do not know how many goals United scored in 2nd half.

Combined insufficient - since opponent scored four goals and manchester scored 4 goals in 2nd half . so either its a draw or manchester win. but its insufficient overall.
Last edited by shashank.ism on Sun Feb 07, 2010 2:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
My Websites:
www.mba.webmaggu.com - India's social Network for MBA Aspirants

www.deal.webmaggu.com -India's online discount, coupon, free stuff informer.

www.dictionary.webmaggu.com - A compact free online dictionary with images.

Nothing is Impossible, even Impossible says I'm possible.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1275
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 11:13 pm
Location: Arabian Sea
Thanked: 125 times
Followed by:2 members

by ajith » Sun Feb 07, 2010 1:20 pm
harsh.champ wrote:In a football match, at the half-time, Manchester United was trailing by three goals. Did it win the match?


A. In the second-half Manchester United scored four goals.

B. The opponent scored four goals in the match.
A is insufficient - we dunno how many goals opponents scored
B is insufficient - we do not know how many goals United scored

Combined insufficient - We do not know how many goals United scored in the first half, all we know is they were trailing by 3 goals
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:16 pm
Location: Chandigarh, INDIA

by onedayi'll » Sun Feb 07, 2010 8:18 pm
E for me
Gym/GMAT/Girl -- Be Serious

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2621
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
Followed by:355 members
GMAT Score:780

by Ian Stewart » Sun Feb 07, 2010 9:58 pm
This is not the type of question you would see on the GMAT, since it requires some knowledge of the rules of football (well, on the GMAT they would call it soccer; football is a different sport in the US). If a test taker thought soccer was like baseball, and that ties were not permitted, they would answer the question differently from someone who knew that a soccer game can end in a draw - if the game cannot end in a tie, the answer is C, whereas if a tie is permitted, the answer is E. The GMAT is not a test of how well you know the rules of different sports, of course!
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 241
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 10:10 pm
Location: Chennai
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:690

by sars72 » Sun Feb 07, 2010 10:28 pm
Ian Stewart wrote:This is not the type of question you would see on the GMAT, since it requires some knowledge of the rules of football (well, on the GMAT they would call it soccer; football is a different sport in the US). If a test taker thought soccer was like baseball, and that ties were not permitted, they would answer the question differently from someone who knew that a soccer game can end in a draw - if the game cannot end in a tie, the answer is C, whereas if a tie is permitted, the answer is E. The GMAT is not a test of how well you know the rules of different sports, of course!
could you please explain how the answer would be C if a tie is not permitted.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2621
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
Followed by:355 members
GMAT Score:780

by Ian Stewart » Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:52 pm
sars72 wrote:
could you please explain how the answer would be C if a tie is not permitted.
Sure - assuming the game cannot end in a tie, someone has to win. Hopefully it's clear that neither statement is sufficient alone. Now, if we take both together, we know that Man U scored at least 4 goals, and that the opponent scored exactly 4 goals. Since the game cannot end in a tie, one team needs to score more goals than the other; the only possibility is that Man U scored more goals than their opponent (in fact, the final score must be 5-4 for Man U).
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:10 am
Thanked: 8 times
Followed by:1 members

by WouldBeCrazy » Sun Dec 23, 2012 5:30 am
This kind of rubbish and controversal questions are very unlikely to come in GMAT.

Have you considered "Same Side Goal"?