GMAT Course Discounts | GMAT Course Reviews

Wekening - Govt. Plan

[This topic has 15 member replies]
Stanford GSB Essay Breakdown – Watch an expert break down this year's Stanford GSB admissions essays at 10AM PST, Sept. 9. Watch and ask questions live here!
Post New Topic   Post Reply

Gmat09_5ALL
Rising GMAT Star

Default Avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 52

Thanks given: 3
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts

Topic: Wekening - Govt. Plan
PostWed Sep 30, 2009 10:28 pm

Elapsed Time:
00:00
Lap   Improve your GMAT score with this timer

6.20
Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of Levaska to increase the amount of money they put into savings, Levaska’s government introduced special savings accounts in which up to $3,000 a year can be saved with no tax due on the interest unless money is withdrawn before the account holder reaches the age of sixty-five. Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so the government’s plan is obviously working.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A. A substantial number of Levaskans have withdrawn at least some of the money they had invested in the special accounts.
B. Workers in Levaska who already save money in long-term tax-free accounts that are offered through their workplace cannot take advantage of the special savings accounts introduced by the government.
C. The rate at which interest earned on money deposited in regular savings accounts is taxed depends on the income bracket of the account holder.
D. Many Levaskans who already had long-term savings have steadily been transferring those savings into the special accounts.
E. Many of the economists who now claim that the government’s plan has been successful criticized it when it was introduced.
Recommend this topic
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Beat The GMAT Practice Questions -- You'll Love Them!
delhiboy1979
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!

Default Avatar

Joined: 11 Feb 2009
Posts: 240

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts

PostThu Oct 01, 2009 1:15 am

I think it should be D.

D implies that there is no additional savings. THe citizens already had the money in the savings and habve onnly been moving them across accounts. So logically, there is no extra savings.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
duongthang
GMAT Destroyer!

Default Avatar

Joined: 20 May 2008
Posts: 837

Thanks given: 2
Thanked 7 times in 7 posts

PostThu Oct 01, 2009 7:39 am

Pls, help, why A is wrong
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
asamaverick
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!



Joined: 28 Sep 2009
Posts: 106

Thanks given: 1
Thanked 25 times in 25 posts
Location: Boston, MA

GMAT Score: 700

PostThu Oct 01, 2009 9:20 am

IMO A is wrong because -

The government’s objective was to increase the money in savings and from the concluding line it is clear that a lot of money did go into this special savings account.

As per ‘A’, substantial number of people withdrew at least some money. This in no way indicates that people did not start saving because of the government initiative. Hence it is not enough to state (based on A) that government failed in its objective.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
duongthang
GMAT Destroyer!

Default Avatar

Joined: 20 May 2008
Posts: 837

Thanks given: 2
Thanked 7 times in 7 posts

PostFri Oct 02, 2009 1:53 am

I still do not understand why A is wrong. pls help
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
srivas
Rising GMAT Star

Default Avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2008
Posts: 76

Thanks given: 4
Thanked 3 times in 3 posts

Target GMAT Score: 710

PostSat Oct 03, 2009 6:28 am

Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so the government’s plan is obviously working

In option D people are trasforing money from the exisiting accounts to the special accounts.

_________________
Gmat710,, Hyd
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jatinder
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!

Default Avatar

Joined: 30 Sep 2008
Posts: 280

Thanks given: 17
Thanked 5 times in 5 posts

Target GMAT Score: 760
GMAT Score: 610

PostSun Oct 04, 2009 5:53 am

Gmat09_5ALL wrote:
6.20
Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of Levaska to increase the amount of money they put into savings, Levaska’s government introduced special savings accounts in which up to $3,000 a year can be saved with no tax due on the interest unless money is withdrawn before the account holder reaches the age of sixty-five. Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so the government’s plan is obviously working.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A. A substantial number of Levaskans have withdrawn at least some of the money they had invested in the special accounts.
B. Workers in Levaska who already save money in long-term tax-free accounts that are offered through their workplace cannot take advantage of the special savings accounts introduced by the government.
C. The rate at which interest earned on money deposited in regular savings accounts is taxed depends on the income bracket of the account holder.
D. Many Levaskans who already had long-term savings have steadily been transferring those savings into the special accounts.
E. Many of the economists who now claim that the government’s plan has been successful criticized it when it was introduced.
What is the source of the question Gmat09?
_________________
Keep flying
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vaibhav.iit2002
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!

Default Avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2008
Posts: 295

Thanks given: 4
Thanked 4 times in 4 posts

GMAT Score: 690

PostMon Oct 05, 2009 7:58 am

Should be D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JeffB
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!

Default Avatar

Joined: 02 Jun 2009
Posts: 153

Thanks given: 4
Thanked 16 times in 16 posts
Location: Ohio

Target GMAT Score: 700

PostMon Oct 05, 2009 5:11 pm

D strengthens the argument, does not weaken it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nawabkhan83
Just gettin' started!

Default Avatar

Joined: 06 Dec 2008
Posts: 1

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
Location: Bangalore

PostTue Oct 06, 2009 4:21 am

JeffB wrote:
D strengthens the argument, does not weaken it.
I think it should be either C or D.
D looks a good option
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
duongthang
GMAT Destroyer!

Default Avatar

Joined: 20 May 2008
Posts: 837

Thanks given: 2
Thanked 7 times in 7 posts

PostThu Oct 15, 2009 2:20 am

Pls, help explain, why A is wrong
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LifetimesofSC
Rising GMAT Star

Default Avatar

Joined: 24 May 2008
Posts: 79

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
Location: O-Town FL

Test Date: Oct 18 12:15AM

PostThu Oct 15, 2009 9:51 am

I fell for the trap but I see it now...and obviously its too late.

1.) Govt wants citizens to increase the $ they put into savings.

2.) A is tricky as it states 'substantial', however D states that citizens have been transferring money from 1 savings account to another, meaning they are not increasing their savings but only balancing/allocating it.

F*** the GMAC/ETS for creating this question
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gmatmachoman
GMAT Titan

Default Avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Posts: 2056

Thanks given: 220
Thanked 122 times in 116 posts

PostThu Oct 15, 2009 11:26 pm

Gmat09_5ALL wrote:
6.20
Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of Levaska to increase the amount of money they put into savings, Levaska’s government introduced special savings accounts in which up to $3,000 a year can be saved with no tax due on the interest unless money is withdrawn before the account holder reaches the age of sixty-five. Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so the government’s plan is obviously working.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A. A substantial number of Levaskans have withdrawn at least some of the money they had invested in the special accounts.
B. Workers in Levaska who already save money in long-term tax-free accounts that are offered through their workplace cannot take advantage of the special savings accounts introduced by the government.
C. The rate at which interest earned on money deposited in regular savings accounts is taxed depends on the income bracket of the account holder.
D. Many Levaskans who already had long-term savings have steadily been transferring those savings into the special accounts.
E. Many of the economists who now claim that the government’s plan has been successful criticized it when it was introduced.
Is it not B???
_________________
http://www.beatthegmat.com/on-causal-arguments-t56647.html

best way to kill anxiety while solving questions is to pause for a second or two and think about the problem rather than jumping straight away for solving it.---- Courtesy :The Pheonix(BTG User)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
duongthang
GMAT Destroyer!

Default Avatar

Joined: 20 May 2008
Posts: 837

Thanks given: 2
Thanked 7 times in 7 posts

PostFri Oct 16, 2009 12:23 am

Pls, explain why A is wrong. A said that a number of people take out money. this is weakening.

pls, help me out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
duongthang
GMAT Destroyer!

Default Avatar

Joined: 20 May 2008
Posts: 837

Thanks given: 2
Thanked 7 times in 7 posts

PostFri Oct 16, 2009 12:42 am

pls, help me why A is wrong
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post New Topic   Post Reply All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2
 
Best Conversation Starters
1. gmat_perfect 91 topics
2. sanju09 84 topics
3. pradeepkaushal9518 57 topics
4. Gurpinder 55 topics
5. kvcpk 29 topics
Most Active Experts
1. Tani Wolff - Kaplan
Kaplan GMAT Teacher
153 posts
2. Rahul@gurome
Gurome
138 posts
3. GMATGuruNY
The Princeton Review Teacher
94 posts
4. Stuart Kovinsky
Kaplan GMAT Teacher
92 posts
5. David@VeritasPrep
Veritas Prep
80 posts