I am having a tough time dissecting the grammar errors in the SC question. I selected (e) as my answer choice, through process of elimination. I would appreciate if someone can walk me through the underlying grammar. Thanks.
Poor people, who already purchase the cheapest food items--starches, frankfurters, beans, and the like--have no items that they can economize when there is a rise in the overall price of food.
a. that they can economize when there is a rise in the overall price of food
b. on which there can be economizing when there is a rise in the overall price of food
c. for economizing if there will be an overall rise in the price of food
d. on which to economize when the overall prices of food rise
e. that can be economical when overall prices of food rise
Weird SC: poor people (ETS GMAT Exam)
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 857
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:36 am
- Thanked: 56 times
- Followed by:15 members
Its a fight between D and E. Anyways an answer is must so i would go with D.
[D] Poor people need to reduce their expenses so according to meaning of sentence , no such food items are left on which they can economize.
[E] passive
the correct sentence is "Poor people, already purchasing the cheapest food items - starches, frankfurters, chicken necks and the like - have no place to economize when overall prices of food rise." -- source NYT
[D] Poor people need to reduce their expenses so according to meaning of sentence , no such food items are left on which they can economize.
[E] passive
the correct sentence is "Poor people, already purchasing the cheapest food items - starches, frankfurters, chicken necks and the like - have no place to economize when overall prices of food rise." -- source NYT
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
I received a PM asking me to comment.tonebeeze wrote:I am having a tough time dissecting the grammar errors in the SC question. I selected (e) as my answer choice, through process of elimination. I would appreciate if someone can walk me through the underlying grammar. Thanks.
Poor people, who already purchase the cheapest food items--starches, frankfurters, beans, and the like--have no items that they can economize when there is a rise in the overall price of food.
a. that they can economize when there is a rise in the overall price of food
b. on which there can be economizing when there is a rise in the overall price of food
c. for economizing if there will be an overall rise in the price of food
d. on which to economize when the overall prices of food rise
e. that can be economical when overall prices of food rise
The correct idiom is to economize on Y. Eliminate A. To economize on something means to spend less money on it or to use it sparingly.
In C, the verb will be should be in the present tense, like all the other verbs in the sentence.
Answer choice E changes the meaning. The intended meaning of the sentence is not that the food items themselves cannot be economical. To be economical means to avoid waste. Eliminate E.
Between B and D, D is better because: it is more concise; it expresses its meaning using verbs (to economize and to rise), whereas B employs nouns (economizing and rise); since different food items have different prices, the plural prices in D is better than the singular price in B. Eliminate B.
The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3