Number Properties
This topic has expert replies
- manpsingh87
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:07 am
- Thanked: 72 times
- Followed by:6 members
well yes.. your answer is correct..!!Anahatha wrote:If 9 is a factor of 2x , is there is a chance for (6x/54)+(2x/3) to be NOT AN INTEGER ? I answered the that it will always be an integer. Is it right? Please explain....
as 9 is a factor of 2x that means x will be a factor of 9..!!!
now consider 6x/54 it can re written as x/9; as 9 is a factor of x therefore x/9 will always be an integer..!!
2x/3; as 9 is a factor of 9 therefor x/3 will always be an intger;
we also know that when an integer is added to another integer it will result in integer as well...!!
hence their sum will be an integer as well...!!!
O Excellence... my search for you is on... you can be far.. but not beyond my reach!
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi!
The question is correct.
Both of you assumed that x has to be an integer, something not stipulated by the question.
Since x doesn't have to be an integer, one cannot assume that if 9 is a factor of 2x, 9 must also be a factor of x.
For example, if you plug in x=4.5, you get:
9 is a factor of 2x, i.e. 9 is a factor of 9; and
6x/54 + 2x/3 = 27/54 + 9/3 = 1/2 + 3 = 3.5 which is NOT an integer.
In fact, the simplest way to solve this type of question is to plug in numbers; pick the smallest possible value for x (in this case 4.5) and plug it into the choices until you find one that isn't an integer.
Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
- abhi0697
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2011 7:39 pm
- Location: Singapore
- Thanked: 6 times
- Followed by:2 members
IMO, the answer from Kaplan is not wrong as:
6x/54 + 2x/3 = 3/6 * 2x/9 + 2x/3
Now when 9 is a factor of 2x; it means 9 is a factor of x when x is an integer; and 9 has to be factor of 2x when x is not an integer (for example, x = 22.5)
So, 3/6 will be cancelled by 2 (which comes from 2x divided by 9) only when x is integer. When x is not an integer then 2x has to be integer to have 9 as a factor.
Hence, 6x/54 + 2x/3 will not always be integer given that 9 is a factor of 2x.
6x/54 + 2x/3 = 3/6 * 2x/9 + 2x/3
Now when 9 is a factor of 2x; it means 9 is a factor of x when x is an integer; and 9 has to be factor of 2x when x is not an integer (for example, x = 22.5)
So, 3/6 will be cancelled by 2 (which comes from 2x divided by 9) only when x is integer. When x is not an integer then 2x has to be integer to have 9 as a factor.
Hence, 6x/54 + 2x/3 will not always be integer given that 9 is a factor of 2x.
- manpsingh87
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:07 am
- Thanked: 72 times
- Followed by:6 members
yep.. agreed... sir.. thanks for the explanation...,, i will be more careful in future while tackling such problems...!!!!Stuart Kovinsky wrote:Hi!
The question is correct.
Both of you assumed that x has to be an integer, something not stipulated by the question.
Since x doesn't have to be an integer, one cannot assume that if 9 is a factor of 2x, 9 must also be a factor of x.
For example, if you plug in x=4.5, you get:
9 is a factor of 2x, i.e. 9 is a factor of 9; and
6x/54 + 2x/3 = 27/54 + 9/3 = 1/2 + 3 = 3.5 which is NOT an integer.
In fact, the simplest way to solve this type of question is to plug in numbers; pick the smallest possible value for x (in this case 4.5) and plug it into the choices until you find one that isn't an integer.
O Excellence... my search for you is on... you can be far.. but not beyond my reach!