knewton 4

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:41 pm
Thanked: 33 times
Followed by:5 members

knewton 4

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Fri Aug 27, 2010 2:03 am
In ancient Tahiti, archery, or skill with a bow and arrows, was considered a sacred sport and practiced primarily by people of high social status. Therefore, people of high social status would have been highly valued during wartime for their archery abilities.

Which of the following most seriously weakens the argument presented?

A
People of high social status comprised a smaller proportion of Tahitian fighting forces than people of lower social status.
B
In ancient Tahiti, bows and arrows were used for hunting and ceremonial purposes, but never as weapons of war.
C
Archery ceremonies sometimes lasted for several days, leaving their participants physically drained.
D
On some occasions, a person of low social status would achieve a high level of skill in archery.
E
Ancient Tahiti was a relatively peaceful and isolated society, and only rarely did wars break out.
A SMALL TOWN GUY

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1893
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 11:48 pm
Thanked: 215 times
Followed by:7 members

by kvcpk » Fri Aug 27, 2010 2:11 am
IMO B.

B provides info that says though the cause occurs, effect doesnot.
"Once you start working on something,
don't be afraid of failure and don't abandon it.
People who work sincerely are the happiest."
Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC-275BC)

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 516
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:42 am
Location: Mumbai
Thanked: 14 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:710

by ankurmit » Fri Aug 27, 2010 3:37 am
definitely B.

It will weaken argument
--------
Ankur mittal

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 85
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 7:50 pm
Thanked: 1 times
GMAT Score:690

by sirisha.g » Fri Aug 27, 2010 3:42 am
B for me too.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:570

by reply2spg » Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:04 am
Only B makses sense here.
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:16 pm
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by debmalya_dutta » Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:28 am
My pick is B
@Deb

Legendary Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pm
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:1 members

by paes » Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:31 pm
one more for B.

B is weakening the assumption that archery was used during the war.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1119
Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 8:50 am
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:3 members

by diebeatsthegmat » Sat Aug 28, 2010 12:50 am
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote:In ancient Tahiti, archery, or skill with a bow and arrows, was considered a sacred sport and practiced primarily by people of high social status. Therefore, people of high social status would have been highly valued during wartime for their archery abilities.

Which of the following most seriously weakens the argument presented?

A
People of high social status comprised a smaller proportion of Tahitian fighting forces than people of lower social status.
B
In ancient Tahiti, bows and arrows were used for hunting and ceremonial purposes, but never as weapons of war.
C
Archery ceremonies sometimes lasted for several days, leaving their participants physically drained.
D
On some occasions, a person of low social status would achieve a high level of skill in archery.
E
Ancient Tahiti was a relatively peaceful and isolated society, and only rarely did wars break out.
i am confused between B and D but chose B. what is the answer?

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:41 pm
Thanked: 33 times
Followed by:5 members

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:04 pm
i had choosen A but oa is B
A SMALL TOWN GUY