find the number of all rational numbers m/n such that
(1) 0 < m/n < 1
(2) m and n are relatively prime
(3) m * n = 25!
(1)255
(2)256
(3)128
(4)64
(5)None of these
_________________
One of the toughest I encountered:Algebra
This topic has expert replies
- harsh.champ
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1132
- Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:38 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 64 times
- Followed by:6 members
- GMAT Score:760
- shashank.ism
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1022
- Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:49 pm
- Location: Gandhinagar
- Thanked: 41 times
- Followed by:2 members
no of primes less than 25=2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19,23=9 so number is 2^(9−1) = 2^8 = 256harsh.champ wrote:find the number of all rational numbers m/n such that
(1) 0 < m/n < 1
(2) m and n are relatively prime
(3) m * n = 25!
(1)255
(2)256
(3)128
(4)64
(5)None of these
_
My Websites:
www.mba.webmaggu.com - India's social Network for MBA Aspirants
www.deal.webmaggu.com -India's online discount, coupon, free stuff informer.
www.dictionary.webmaggu.com - A compact free online dictionary with images.
Nothing is Impossible, even Impossible says I'm possible.
www.mba.webmaggu.com - India's social Network for MBA Aspirants
www.deal.webmaggu.com -India's online discount, coupon, free stuff informer.
www.dictionary.webmaggu.com - A compact free online dictionary with images.
Nothing is Impossible, even Impossible says I'm possible.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 9:23 am
- Location: Madison, WI
- Thanked: 17 times
Hey Shashank,shashank.ism wrote: no of primes less than 25=2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19,23=9 so number is 2^(9−1) = 2^8 = 256
Could you expand on this a little bit? I didn't totally understand your solution.
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
"relatively prime" is not a term you'll ever see on the GMAT - what does it mean?
Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 9:23 am
- Location: Madison, WI
- Thanked: 17 times
Hey Stuart,Stuart Kovinsky wrote:"relatively prime" is not a term you'll ever see on the GMAT - what does it mean?
Yeah I've never seen it on a GMAT question either. For reference though two numbers who are "relatively prime" have no common factors.
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
Really don't think this can reasonably be solved in under 5 minutes, but hey, let's try.harsh.champ wrote:find the number of all rational numbers m/n such that
(1) 0 < m/n < 1
(2) m and n are relatively prime
(3) m * n = 25!
(1)255
(2)256
(3)128
(4)64
(5)None of these
Ok, given that relatively prime means no primes in common:
If m*n = 25!, then m and n must share all the primes between 2 and 23, namely:
2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19 and 23.
However, there are multiples of many of those primes, so we really need to think about all the other numbers as well:
4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, 24 and 25.
Now, since m and n can't have any primes in common, certain of these numbers must be paired together.
For example, whichever one of them has 2 also has to have 3, since 6, 12, 18 and 24 are multiples of both of those numbers. Similarly, 10 is a multiple of 2 and 5, so that also must be included. 14 is 2*7, 18 is 2*9, 22 is 2*11, so:
2, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 must all be factors of the same one of m or n.
This means that 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, 22, 24 and 25 must all be factors of one of m or n, leaving only:
13, 17, 19 and 23 up for grabs.
Given that m/n is a proper fraction, we know that m < n, so:
n MUST be a multiple of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, 22, 24 and 25.
With 4 numbers left, each one can be assigned to either m or n (after all, we could have m=1 and n = 25!).
There are 16 ways to distribute 4 objects to 2 different groups, so 16 is our final answer... choose (5).
I'd love to see the official explanation - where is this from?
Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 12:28 am
- Thanked: 20 times
- Followed by:1 members
what are the chances of such problems coming in GMAT ??
Above what level is this problem ? above 700? 750 ?
It was indeed a quite difficult qs
Above what level is this problem ? above 700? 750 ?
It was indeed a quite difficult qs
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:Really don't think this can reasonably be solved in under 5 minutes, but hey, let's try.harsh.champ wrote:find the number of all rational numbers m/n such that
(1) 0 < m/n < 1
(2) m and n are relatively prime
(3) m * n = 25!
(1)255
(2)256
(3)128
(4)64
(5)None of these
Ok, given that relatively prime means no primes in common:
If m*n = 25!, then m and n must share all the primes between 2 and 23, namely:
2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19 and 23.
However, there are multiples of many of those primes, so we really need to think about all the other numbers as well:
4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, 24 and 25.
Now, since m and n can't have any primes in common, certain of these numbers must be paired together.
For example, whichever one of them has 2 also has to have 3, since 6, 12, 18 and 24 are multiples of both of those numbers. Similarly, 10 is a multiple of 2 and 5, so that also must be included. 14 is 2*7, 18 is 2*9, 22 is 2*11, so:
2, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 must all be factors of the same one of m or n.
This means that 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, 22, 24 and 25 must all be factors of one of m or n, leaving only:
13, 17, 19 and 23 up for grabs.
Given that m/n is a proper fraction, we know that m < n, so:
n MUST be a multiple of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, 22, 24 and 25.
With 4 numbers left, each one can be assigned to either m or n (after all, we could have m=1 and n = 25!).
There are 16 ways to distribute 4 objects to 2 different groups, so 16 is our final answer... choose (5).
I'd love to see the official explanation - where is this from?
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
I'd say chance is 0!bhumika.k.shah wrote:what are the chances of such problems coming in GMAT ??
Above what level is this problem ? above 700? 750 ?
It was indeed a quite difficult qs
Still not sure what the source is (or what the official answer is).
Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Ian Stewart
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2621
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
- Location: Montreal
- Thanked: 1090 times
- Followed by:355 members
- GMAT Score:780
There is no chance whatsoever of encountering a question like this on the GMAT (you don't even need to know what 'rational number' or 'relatively prime' mean on the test), so anyone reading this forum only for GMAT help can move on to other problems without giving this question another thought. If anyone wants a solution for interest's sake, I can try to provide one (shashank's solution above is correct, though I'll try to go into more detail) --harsh.champ wrote:find the number of all rational numbers m/n such that
(1) 0 < m/n < 1
(2) m and n are relatively prime
(3) m * n = 25!
(1)255
(2)256
(3)128
(4)64
(5)None of these
_________________
* we are looking for two numbers m and n for which m*n = 25!. While it's not necessary, it will be easier to explain the solution if we prime factorize 25!:
25! = (2^22)(3^10)(5^6)(7^3)(11^2)(13)(17)(19)(23)
* Now, m and n are relatively prime, which means they have no common prime divisors. That means that if m is divisible by, say, 2, then n cannot be. So if m*n will be equal to 25!, and if m is divisible by 2, then m actually must be divisible by 2^22, since those twenty-two 2's must be in m*n, and only one of m or n can be divisible by 2. The same is true for each of the remaining primes in the prime factorization above: all of the 3's are in either m or n, all of the 5's are in either m or n, and so on. So for each of the nine different primes in the prime factorization of 25!, we have two choices: give the prime to m or give the prime to n. Since there are nine primes in total, we could assign these primes to m and n in 2^9 ways. To give some examples of the values we might get for m and n doing this:
m = (2^22)(3^10)(5^6)(7^3)(11^2) and n = (13)(17)(19)(23)
m = (3^10) and n = (2^22)(5^6)(7^3)(11^2)(13)(17)(19)(23)
m = (13)(17)(19)(23) and n = (2^22)(3^10)(5^6)(7^3)(11^2)
m = 1 and n = (2^22)(3^10)(5^6)(7^3)(11^2)(13)(17)(19)(23)
etc.
* In this way, we can be sure that m*n = 25!, and that m and n are relatively prime (i.e. they have no prime divisors in common). We've ignored one condition, however: m must be less than n. Since half the time m will be smaller than n, and half the time m will be larger than n, we must divide by 2; the answer is 2^9/2 = 2^8 = 256.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com
ianstewartgmat.com
ianstewartgmat.com