A little under a million years ago, the briny waters of the Baltic Sea began flooding into the cold North Atlantic: geologists are still debating whether the flood was gradual or created a cataclysm.
(A) whether the flood was gradual or created a cataclysm
(B) if the flood was gradual or created a cataclysm
(C) about whether the flood was gradual or cataclysmic
(D) whether the flood was gradual or cataclysmic
(E) whether the flood was gradual or it created a cataclysm
OA=D
I answered this correctly. I'm just curious to see what other logic can be used to arrive at the same answer.
1000SC Qn:12
This topic has expert replies
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:27 am
whehter : alternativesscorpion_phoenix wrote:A little under a million years ago, the briny waters of the Baltic Sea began flooding into the cold North Atlantic: geologists are still debating whether the flood was gradual or created a cataclysm.
(A) whether the flood was gradual or created a cataclysm
(B) if the flood was gradual or created a cataclysm
(C) about whether the flood was gradual or cataclysmic
(D) whether the flood was gradual or cataclysmic
(E) whether the flood was gradual or it created a cataclysm
OA=D
I answered this correctly. I'm just curious to see what other logic can be used to arrive at the same answer.
if: conditional
B & C out
Paralellism between was x or y
Only D complies that.
D - is correct because it uses two adjectives, which satisfies the parallel structure requirement.scorpion_phoenix wrote:A little under a million years ago, the briny waters of the Baltic Sea began flooding into the cold North Atlantic: geologists are still debating whether the flood was gradual or created a cataclysm.
(A) whether the flood was gradual or created a cataclysm
(B) if the flood was gradual or created a cataclysm
(C) about whether the flood was gradual or cataclysmic
(D) whether the flood was gradual or cataclysmic
(E) whether the flood was gradual or it created a cataclysm
OA=D
I answered this correctly. I'm just curious to see what other logic can be used to arrive at the same answer.
A & E - can be eliminated because they violate the parallelism rule.
B - is wrong because it lacks parallel structure, and because the use of "if" is unidiomatic (see page 193 of MGMAT SC).
C - is wrong because it "...about whether..." is redundant.
If my reasoning is incorrect here, I would appreciate it someone could explain why. Thanks.