The physicians explained that had the patient known the warning signs of canser, he would have come in earlier for a check-up.
A.
B. if the patient had known the warning signs of canser, he would have come in earlier
C. if the patient knew the warning signs of canser, he would have come in earlier
D. had the patient known the warning signs of canser, he would come in earlier
E. if the patient would have known the warning signs of canser, he would have come in earlier.
OA is A
I think both A and B are right.What is the difference in particular? Grammar allows to use both constructions....
Tricky Subjunctive mood
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 10:16 am
- Location: San Francisco
- Thanked: 14 times
This question is testing your knowledge about tenses. The word "if" requires a logical step that follows it immediately. In the case of choice B, the if is referring to an event in the past, so logiclly the follow-up step would have taken in the past as well. Let's examine carefully.
The first clause of B is "if the patient........(past perfect tense because of had known), second clause "he would have come in earlier (past progressive tense). The way to correct it is, "If the patient had known....then he would have gone to see the doctor". Otherwise, use just had known, which is just past progressive tense.
The first clause of B is "if the patient........(past perfect tense because of had known), second clause "he would have come in earlier (past progressive tense). The way to correct it is, "If the patient had known....then he would have gone to see the doctor". Otherwise, use just had known, which is just past progressive tense.
I think the key here is in case of subjunctive construction should be
Subjunctive + That + Clause (Clause should have the verb in base form)
Choice A exactly follows this pattern by using "known". Only confusion is presence of "had" after that, but here had is not used as a verb.
In choice B verb construction is "had known" which does not agree with the subjunctive construction.
Subjunctive + That + Clause (Clause should have the verb in base form)
Choice A exactly follows this pattern by using "known". Only confusion is presence of "had" after that, but here had is not used as a verb.
In choice B verb construction is "had known" which does not agree with the subjunctive construction.
- Mayur Sand
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 11:16 pm
- Location: India
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 3:55 am
B. if the patient had known the warning signs of canser, he would have come in earlier
C. if the patient knew the warning signs of canser, he would have come in earlier
The answer choice is 'B' because it is has a 'condition' and correctly uses the construction below:
(past perfect (1st) + 2nd (would +have past participle)
C. if the patient knew the warning signs of canser, he would have come in earlier
The answer choice is 'B' because it is has a 'condition' and correctly uses the construction below:
(past perfect (1st) + 2nd (would +have past participle)
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 7:06 pm
- Location: Shanghai, China, the People's Republic of