1.AMS employs 8 professors on their staff. Their respective probability of remaining in employment for 10 years is 0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,0.8,0.9 .The probability that after 10 years at least 6 of them still at work?
2.6 people go to a temple.While returning none of them is wearing their own footwear.
In how many ways is this possible?
Tricky PnC and probablity question
This topic has expert replies
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 9:04 am
- Thanked: 2 times
My solution:
1. 1 - P(only one remain after 10 years) - p(no one remains after 10 years)
P(no one remains after 10 years) = 0.8*0.7*0.6*0.5*0.4*0.3*0.2*0.1
P(1 remains after 10 years) = 0.2*0.7*0.6*0.5*0.4*0.3*0.2*0.1 + 0.8*0.3*0.6*0.5*0.4*0.3*0.2*0.1 + 0.8*0.7*0.4*0.5*0.4*0.3*0.2*0.1 + 0.8*0.7*0.6*0.5*0.4*0.3*0.2*0.1 + 0.8*0.7*0.6*0.5*0.6*0.3*0.2*0.1 + 0.8*0.7*0.6*0.5*0.4*0.7*0.2*0.1 + 0.8*0.7*0.6*0.5*0.4*0.3*0.8*0.1 + 0.8*0.7*0.6*0.5*0.4*0.3*0.2*0.9
But certainly, calculation will take a lot of time. I'm not sure this is perfect method.
2. 6![1 - 1/1! + 1/2! - 1/3! + 1/4! - 1/5! + 1/6!] = 505
1. 1 - P(only one remain after 10 years) - p(no one remains after 10 years)
P(no one remains after 10 years) = 0.8*0.7*0.6*0.5*0.4*0.3*0.2*0.1
P(1 remains after 10 years) = 0.2*0.7*0.6*0.5*0.4*0.3*0.2*0.1 + 0.8*0.3*0.6*0.5*0.4*0.3*0.2*0.1 + 0.8*0.7*0.4*0.5*0.4*0.3*0.2*0.1 + 0.8*0.7*0.6*0.5*0.4*0.3*0.2*0.1 + 0.8*0.7*0.6*0.5*0.6*0.3*0.2*0.1 + 0.8*0.7*0.6*0.5*0.4*0.7*0.2*0.1 + 0.8*0.7*0.6*0.5*0.4*0.3*0.8*0.1 + 0.8*0.7*0.6*0.5*0.4*0.3*0.2*0.9
But certainly, calculation will take a lot of time. I'm not sure this is perfect method.
2. 6![1 - 1/1! + 1/2! - 1/3! + 1/4! - 1/5! + 1/6!] = 505
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 9:04 am
- Thanked: 2 times
akdayal wrote:My solution:
1. 1 - P(only one remain after 10 years) - p(no one remains after 10 years)
P(no one remains after 10 years) = 0.8*0.7*0.6*0.5*0.4*0.3*0.2*0.1
P(1 remains after 10 years) = 0.2*0.7*0.6*0.5*0.4*0.3*0.2*0.1 + 0.8*0.3*0.6*0.5*0.4*0.3*0.2*0.1 + 0.8*0.7*0.4*0.5*0.4*0.3*0.2*0.1 + 0.8*0.7*0.6*0.5*0.4*0.3*0.2*0.1 + 0.8*0.7*0.6*0.5*0.6*0.3*0.2*0.1 + 0.8*0.7*0.6*0.5*0.4*0.7*0.2*0.1 + 0.8*0.7*0.6*0.5*0.4*0.3*0.8*0.1 + 0.8*0.7*0.6*0.5*0.4*0.3*0.2*0.9
But certainly, calculation will take a lot of time. I'm not sure this is perfect method.
2. 6![1 - 1/1! + 1/2! - 1/3! + 1/4! - 1/5! + 1/6!] = 505
for 2nd one 265 is the answer could you please tell me the logic
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 9:04 am
- Thanked: 2 times
reddy43 wrote:for n things not to be in their right places
no. of ways = n!{1/2!-1/3!+....(-1)^n*1/n!} where n>=2
so we will have this one as 265 ways
can u explain me how does this formula work ? what is the logic behind this? where to use
- shovan85
- Community Manager
- Posts: 991
- Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 6:19 am
- Location: Bangalore, India
- Thanked: 146 times
- Followed by:24 members
This is a Q of Derangementsixpointer wrote:reddy43 wrote:for n things not to be in their right places
no. of ways = n!{1/2!-1/3!+....(-1)^n*1/n!} where n>=2
so we will have this one as 265 ways
can u explain me how does this formula work ? what is the logic behind this? where to use
I can explain how it works but do not ever dare to get into the logic as the concept behind the formula will drive you crazy...
Derangement means the item should not appear at the place where it originally was.
Say ABC now we can arrange this in 3!=6 ways
1.ABC
2.ACB
3.BAC
4.BCA
5.CAB
6.CBA
But the derangement will be 2 only BCA and CAB. see none of A B or C are being placed at their original places. A cant be at 1st, B cant be at 2nd and C cant be at 3rd place.
So just remember the formula no. of ways = n!{1/2!-1/3!+....(-1)^n*1/n!} where n>=2 .
My example n=3 Thus, 3!{1/2! - 1/3!} = 2.
Need more info https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derangement
but it will have Limit (Math). So be careful
If the problem is Easy Respect it, if the problem is tough Attack it
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 9:04 am
- Thanked: 2 times
- shovan85
- Community Manager
- Posts: 991
- Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 6:19 am
- Location: Bangalore, India
- Thanked: 146 times
- Followed by:24 members
If your answer is incorrect then I believe you have to subtract 6 instead of 3. (347,357,367, And 763,753,743) calculated twice. Once from 3 to 10 and other from 7 to 3.sixpointer wrote:@Shovan bhai can you please explain me probablity question ?
Question is asking minimum is 3 or maximum is 7
So in these 6 cases the case is minimum is 3 AND maximum is 7.
Rest all approach is correct I believe.
If the problem is Easy Respect it, if the problem is tough Attack it
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 9:04 am
- Thanked: 2 times
shovan85 wrote:If your answer is incorrect then I believe you have to subtract 6 instead of 3. (347,357,367, And 763,753,743) calculated twice. Once from 3 to 10 and other from 7 to 3.sixpointer wrote:@Shovan bhai can you please explain me probablity question ?
Question is asking minimum is 3 or maximum is 7
So in these 6 cases the case is minimum is 3 AND maximum is 7.
Rest all approach is correct I believe.
@Shovan try it :- Three numbers are chosen at random without replacement from( 1,2,3...10).The probability that the minimum is 3 or the maximum is seven?
P.S :- I got my mistake
- shovan85
- Community Manager
- Posts: 991
- Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 6:19 am
- Location: Bangalore, India
- Thanked: 146 times
- Followed by:24 members
Is it 1/10? (My answer includes minimum is 3 AND maximum is 7 also)sixpointer wrote:shovan85 wrote:If your answer is incorrect then I believe you have to subtract 6 instead of 3. (347,357,367, And 763,753,743) calculated twice. Once from 3 to 10 and other from 7 to 3.sixpointer wrote:@Shovan bhai can you please explain me probablity question ?
Question is asking minimum is 3 or maximum is 7
So in these 6 cases the case is minimum is 3 AND maximum is 7.
Rest all approach is correct I believe.
@Shovan try it :- Three numbers are chosen at random without replacement from( 1,2,3...10).The probability that the minimum is 3 or the maximum is seven?
P.S :- I got my mistake
If the problem is Easy Respect it, if the problem is tough Attack it
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 9:04 am
- Thanked: 2 times
shovan85 wrote:Is it 1/10? (My answer includes minimum is 3 AND maximum is 7 also)sixpointer wrote:shovan85 wrote:If your answer is incorrect then I believe you have to subtract 6 instead of 3. (347,357,367, And 763,753,743) calculated twice. Once from 3 to 10 and other from 7 to 3.sixpointer wrote:@Shovan bhai can you please explain me probablity question ?
Question is asking minimum is 3 or maximum is 7
So in these 6 cases the case is minimum is 3 AND maximum is 7.
Rest all approach is correct I believe.
@Shovan try it :- Three numbers are chosen at random without replacement from( 1,2,3...10).The probability that the minimum is 3 or the maximum is seven?
P.S :- I got my mistake
it should not include 3 and max 7 case , See the bold Part:)
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 9:04 am
- Thanked: 2 times
one more :- A, B, C and D are four towns any three of which are non-collinear. Then the number of ways to construct
three roads each joining a pair of towns so that the roads do not form a triangle is
9 , 10 , 12 , 24
three roads each joining a pair of towns so that the roads do not form a triangle is
9 , 10 , 12 , 24