Tough SC

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 468
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:17 pm
Thanked: 5 times

Tough SC

by moneyman » Mon Nov 24, 2008 5:55 am
check it out
Attachments
Rock Samples SC ANs E.JPG
Maxx

Legendary Member
Posts: 1153
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:21 am
Thanked: 146 times
Followed by:2 members

by parallel_chase » Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:04 am
Rock samples........have been dated....and thus are

This eliminates A and B, incorrect usage of "has"

option D, "are" is missing. incorrect usage "thus evidence", We need a linking verb "are" to connect the subject "rock samples" with its verb "evidenced"

I would like to know if there are any other errors in D.

Option C changes the meaning, "dated to be"

Option E Clear and concise.

OA?
No rest for the Wicked....

Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 am
Thanked: 55 times
Followed by:1 members

by iamcste » Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:46 am
parallel_chase wrote: I would like to know if there are any other errors in D.


Being is wordy

OA?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 377
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:30 am
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:2 members

by schumi_gmat » Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:30 am
ISnt the subordinate clause modifying the asteroid?

If true, then the verb should be singular.

I am little confused here. Can anyone please explain?

Legendary Member
Posts: 1153
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:21 am
Thanked: 146 times
Followed by:2 members

by parallel_chase » Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:37 am
schumi_gmat wrote:ISnt the subordinate clause modifying the asteroid?

If true, then the verb should be singular.

I am little confused here. Can anyone please explain?
First of all there is no subordinate clause. Indication of that is there is no comma,

Independent clauses are differentiated either through semi-colon or cordinating conjunction.

Subordinate clauses or phrases are always introduced with comma.

Coming to your question.

What can be dated here. Only "Rock samples taken from remains of asteroid"

Rock samples = plural, have= plural

Hope its clear.
Last edited by parallel_chase on Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
No rest for the Wicked....

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 458
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 10:44 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by gmat009 » Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:38 am
parallel_chase wrote:Rock samples........have been dated....and thus are

This eliminates A and B, incorrect usage of "has"

option D, "are" is missing. incorrect usage "thus evidence", We need a linking verb "are" to connect the subject "rock samples" with its verb "evidenced"

I would like to know if there are any other errors in D.

Option C changes the meaning, "dated to be"

Option E Clear and concise.

OA?
Can you explain why "dated to be" changes the meaning of sentence

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 377
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:30 am
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:2 members

by schumi_gmat » Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:53 am
PC Wrote:
Subordinate clauses or phrases are always introduced with comma.
PC, my undersatnding was -

that introduces a restrictive clause and is never set off by comma.
This is the post i referred.


That v/s which
https://www.worldwidewords.org/articles/which.htm

Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 am
Thanked: 55 times
Followed by:1 members

by iamcste » Mon Nov 24, 2008 11:07 am
schumi_gmat wrote:PC Wrote:
Subordinate clauses or phrases are always introduced with comma.
PC, my undersatnding was -

that introduces a restrictive clause and is never set off by comma.
This is the post i referred.


That v/s which
https://www.worldwidewords.org/articles/which.htm

Subordinate means non essential or non restrictive clauses. Such clauses are marked with commas

That is an essential or restrictive modiifer means its not subordinate/non-essential and hence no commas ( as you understood)


In the sentence, we have that meaning we have restrictive modifer and not subordinate or non essential modifier

hence, no commas are there


hence, you reference to that clause as subordinate is incorrect

Legendary Member
Posts: 1153
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:21 am
Thanked: 146 times
Followed by:2 members

by parallel_chase » Mon Nov 24, 2008 2:14 pm
There is one little exception to the rule that I mentioned.

If the subordinate clause is an adverb clause, introduced at the end of the sentence, comma is not used to separate it from the main clause.

Hope this helps.
No rest for the Wicked....

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 4:34 am
Location: Pittsburgh
Thanked: 9 times

by Tryingmybest » Mon Nov 24, 2008 5:14 pm
OA PLZ?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 458
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 10:44 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by gmat009 » Mon Nov 24, 2008 7:32 pm
parallel_chase wrote:There is one little exception to the rule that I mentioned.

If the subordinate clause is an adverb clause, introduced at the end of the sentence, comma is not used to separate it from the main clause.

Hope this helps.
Can you explain why "dated to be" changes the meaning of sentence

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 468
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:17 pm
Thanked: 5 times

by moneyman » Tue Nov 25, 2008 12:25 am
OA is E

What is wrong with "dated to be" ?
Maxx

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 468
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:17 pm
Thanked: 5 times

by moneyman » Tue Nov 25, 2008 12:30 am
OA is E

What is wrong with "dated to be" ?
Maxx

Legendary Member
Posts: 1153
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:21 am
Thanked: 146 times
Followed by:2 members

by parallel_chase » Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:15 am
gmat009 wrote:Can you explain why "dated to be" changes the meaning of sentence
I apologize for the delayed response. Here is the difference between the two.


Samples dated at 3 million years old - dated back in time

Samples dated to be 3 million years old - actual dated time

Let me know if you guys think otherwise, to be honest I am confused myself now.
No rest for the Wicked....

Legendary Member
Posts: 1153
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:21 am
Thanked: 146 times
Followed by:2 members

by parallel_chase » Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:32 am
I have PM Stacey and asked her to respond to this question.


Rock samples taken from the remains of an asteroid about twice the size of the 6-nuke-wide asteroid that eradicated the dinosaurs has been dated to be 3.47 billion years old and thus is evidence of the earliest known asteroid impact on Earth.

A. has been dated to be 3.47 billion years old and thus is

B. has been dated at 3.47 billion years old and thus

C. have been dated to be 3.47billion years old and thus are

D. have been dated as being 3.47 billion years old and thus

E. have been dated at 3.47billion years old and thus are
No rest for the Wicked....