The mayor plans to - OG verbal review

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:53 am

The mayor plans to - OG verbal review

by Jai_itguys » Sat Aug 07, 2010 12:55 am
Editorial: The mayor plans to deactivate the city's fire alarm boxes, because most calls received from
them are false alarms. The mayor claims that the alarm boxes are no longer necessary, since
most people now have access to either public or private telephone. But the city's commercial
district, where there is the greatest risk of fire, has few residents and few public telephones, so
some alarm boxes are still necessary.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the editorial's argument?


a) Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs the city more than five million dollars annually.
b) Commercial buildings have automatic fire alarm systems that are linked directly to the fire department
c) The fire department gets less information from an alarm box than it does from a telephone call.
d) The city's fire department is located much closer to the residential areas than to the commercial district.
e) On average, almost 25 percent of the public telephones in the city are out of order.

My doubt:

For me there are 2 conclusions in this question:
1) The mayor claims that the alarm boxes are no longer necessary, since most people now have access to either public or private telephone
2) the city's commercial district, where there is the greatest risk of fire, has few residents and few public telephones, so some alarm boxes are still necessary.

Option e weakens the conclusion 1 and option b weakens conclusion 2. Which one should I choose

OG B

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 44
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:15 am
Thanked: 3 times

by showbiz » Sat Aug 07, 2010 1:21 am
Jai_itguys wrote:Editorial: The mayor plans to deactivate the city's fire alarm boxes, because most calls received from
them are false alarms. The mayor claims that the alarm boxes are no longer necessary, since
most people now have access to either public or private telephone. But the city's commercial
district, where there is the greatest risk of fire, has few residents and few public telephones, so
some alarm boxes are still necessary.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the editorial's argument?


a) Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs the city more than five million dollars annually.
b) Commercial buildings have automatic fire alarm systems that are linked directly to the fire department
c) The fire department gets less information from an alarm box than it does from a telephone call.
d) The city's fire department is located much closer to the residential areas than to the commercial district.
e) On average, almost 25 percent of the public telephones in the city are out of order.

My doubt:

For me there are 2 conclusions in this question:
1) The mayor claims that the alarm boxes are no longer necessary, since most people now have access to either public or private telephone
2) the city's commercial district, where there is the greatest risk of fire, has few residents and few public telephones, so some alarm boxes are still necessary.

Option e weakens the conclusion 1 and option b weakens conclusion 2. Which one should I choose

OG B
"Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the editorial's argument?"

The mayor said something he felt, but the editorial has their own opinion, which is in contrast to the mayors opinion. Hence the following is the conclusion.


But the city's commercial
district, where there is the greatest risk of fire, has few residents and few public telephones, so
some alarm boxes are still necessary. - thats your conclusion.