• Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors

The attribution of the choral work Lacrimae

This topic has 6 member replies
amysky_0205 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
05 Dec 2012
Posted:
193 messages
Followed by:
5 members
Thanked:
4 times
Target GMAT Score:
700+

The attribution of the choral work Lacrimae

Post Wed Dec 05, 2012 7:00 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    OG13-CR#81
    The attribution of the choral work Lacrime to the composer Pescard (1400-1474) has been regarded as tentative, since it was based on a single treatise from the early 1500s that named Pescard as the composer. Recently, several musical treaties from the late 1500s have come to light, all of which name Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae. Unfortunately, these newly discovered treatises lend no support to the attribution of Lacrimae to Pescard, since____________.

    (A)the treatise from the early 1500s misidentifies the composers of some of the musical works it considers

    (B)the author of the treatise from the early 1500s had no very strong evidence on which to base the identification Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae

    (C)there are works that can conclusively be attributed to Pescard that are cultivated specifically for the seed they produce rather than for their leaves or roots not even mentioned in the treatise from the early 1500s

    (D)the later treatises probably had no source for their attribution other than the earlier treatise

    (E)no known treatises from the 1600s identify Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae

    OA:D

    I don't know which one to choose... and don't know exactly what it's about.
    can someone explain this?
    thank u...

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    amysky_0205 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    05 Dec 2012
    Posted:
    193 messages
    Followed by:
    5 members
    Thanked:
    4 times
    Target GMAT Score:
    700+
    Post Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:51 am
    can someone help~??? Experts plz!

    sri_r Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    26 Nov 2012
    Posted:
    15 messages
    Thanked:
    1 times
    Post Mon Dec 17, 2012 3:51 am
    The correct answer is D because even though there are other treatises that attribute Lacrimae to Pescard, what would happen if they all rely on the original treatise(from early 1500s). In such a case, inspite of have multiple treatises as evidence, but the source would still be just one treatise and it is clearly mentioned in the first sentence that we cannot conclude definitely who is the author from a single treatise.

    himu Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
    Joined
    21 Dec 2008
    Posted:
    345 messages
    Followed by:
    3 members
    Thanked:
    6 times
    Post Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:40 am
    Requesting experts to kindly throw some light.
    Thanks in advance.

    shenoydevika Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    09 Jan 2013
    Posted:
    78 messages
    Followed by:
    4 members
    Thanked:
    9 times
    GMAT Score:
    700
    Post Sat Jan 26, 2013 7:02 am
    I'm no expert but I will try to explain.

    Here is what we understand from what we are told.
    1. - Pescard is believed to have composed Lacrime. This is however tentative. Because there is only one treatise from the early 1500s which names him as the composer.
    2. - Several new musical treatises from the late 1500s have been discovered. All of these name Pescard as the composer of Lacrime.

    Now this should be conclusive proof that Pescard wrote Lacrime right. Because the later treatises confirm what the older one said.

    However the author says that newly discovered treatises do no support the attribution.
    What could be the reason?

    A] Doesn't matter. Doesn't explain why the LATTER treatises shouldn't prove that the first one was correct.
    B] Ok maybe so. But if the latter treatises confirm Pescard as the composer, then it must be correct. But we are told it's not.
    C]I don't even understand what this option means. Seeds? Leaves? WHATTTT??? Ignore!!!!
    D] This option tells us that the latter treatises probably referred to the older ones. So if the older treatise was wrong, the latter ones would be too. That's why we cannot depend on what the latter treatises say. CORRECT OPTION.
    E] I disregarded it because it brings in new information about treatises from 1600. We only care about the early 1500s treatise and the late 1500s treatises here!

    Hope this helps. I can elaborate if required

    charu_mahajan Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
    Joined
    31 Jan 2012
    Posted:
    111 messages
    Followed by:
    8 members
    Thanked:
    15 times
    Post Mon Jan 28, 2013 1:28 pm
    I guess shenoydevika has said it all.

    EARLY 1500's ---------------------
    Only one treatise says that Pescard is composer.

    --------------------------- LATE 1500's
    Several treatises say that Pescard is composer.

    Now look at the question. Why can't we trust those SEVERAL treatises' ???
    Maybe the source of information of those SEVERAL treatises was that one treaty from early 1500's.
    Does this make sense now??

    himu Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
    Joined
    21 Dec 2008
    Posted:
    345 messages
    Followed by:
    3 members
    Thanked:
    6 times
    Post Mon Jan 28, 2013 6:31 pm
    Yes thanks Devika n Charu for your expert inputs
    real thanks Smile

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 Vincen 180 topics
    2 lheiannie07 61 topics
    3 Roland2rule 54 topics
    4 ardz24 44 topics
    5 VJesus12 14 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    155 posts
    2 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    105 posts
    3 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    101 posts
    4 image description Jay@ManhattanReview

    Manhattan Review

    82 posts
    5 image description Matt@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    80 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts