Subject/Verb agreement? A question from Kaplan. Thanks!

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:14 am
It was anomalies in the orbit of Uranus that led to the discovery of Neptune.

A) It was anomalies in the orbit of Uranus that
E) The anomalies in the orbit of Uranus was what

My pick was E), because it looks more concise to me. However, the correct answer is A). The explanation is that the subject and verb don't agree in E). Doesn't the same error apply to A) given the explanation on E)?

Thanks in advance!

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:14 am

plural/sigular

by Jinger » Tue Oct 09, 2007 7:35 am
Shouldn't A) written as Those were anomalies in the orbit of Uranus that led to the discovery of Neptune.
I think that the phrase "anomalies in the orbit of Uranus" is plural.

I am so confused!

Community Manager
Posts: 117
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:49 pm
Thanked: 9 times

by pahwa » Tue Oct 09, 2007 7:30 pm
I very well remember coming across this question during my prep.

Please note that the author is talking about the reason for discovery and not the reasons.
Hence "It was anomalies" is correct.

Ask yourself, "What led to the discovery?"
Answer is "It was" that is "Reason for that to happen was "existence of anomalies"

Hope you got this.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:14 am

Thanks

by Jinger » Wed Oct 10, 2007 5:37 am
Thank you so much! That helps a lot. GMAT is a tricky business. :shock:

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:01 pm
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:1 members

Ans....

by jangojess » Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:59 am
here the discovery of anomalies that led to....
It was the anomalies means....it was the discovery of anomalies...here is discovery is the subject and so verb WAS is correct...In E the anomalies is taken as the reason...and also here the subject is THE ANOMALIES and so WERE shld be the verb....

pahwa...good explanation
Trying hard!!!

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:14 am

by Jinger » Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:45 am
Great explanations! Thanks again!