Citing the frequency with which gum disease and heart disease occur in the same patients, many dentists believe that periodontal disease is a cause of a variety of cardiovascular problems, including Coronary Artery Disease.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the claim that periodontal disease is a cause of Coronary Artery disease?
Choices
A
Bacteria present in infected gums can become mobile and enter the bloodstream, causing arterial plaque to accumulate.
B
People who brush and floss their teeth regularly are also more likely to exercise and eat a healthy diet.
C
Infected gums are more prone to bleeding, which allows bacteria to escape the mouth and irritate arteries.
D
People who experience loss of teeth due to periodontal disease usually cut back on many foods that are harder to chew, such as lean meats and vegetables, and increase their consumption of processed foods like pudding and ice cream.
E
Patients with no history of heart disease are much less likely to have periodontal disease than patients who have had a cardiac transplant.
IMO E
But this was the answer: OA B
Stumped
This topic has expert replies
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 6:56 am
- Thanked: 2 times
hey.. that was a very good question. The only reason I can think of is this.
A,C,D all support the argument.
E - also supports by establishing a connection between peridontal and heart disease. Though the statement takes time to comprehend, it can be eliminated.
B - though not the best reason, is the only one among the options that states that there is no correlation between the 2 diseases.
A,C,D all support the argument.
E - also supports by establishing a connection between peridontal and heart disease. Though the statement takes time to comprehend, it can be eliminated.
B - though not the best reason, is the only one among the options that states that there is no correlation between the 2 diseases.
- reply2spg
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
- Thanked: 27 times
- GMAT Score:570
What is the source??
vindooo wrote:Citing the frequency with which gum disease and heart disease occur in the same patients, many dentists believe that periodontal disease is a cause of a variety of cardiovascular problems, including Coronary Artery Disease.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the claim that periodontal disease is a cause of Coronary Artery disease?
Choices
A
Bacteria present in infected gums can become mobile and enter the bloodstream, causing arterial plaque to accumulate.
B
People who brush and floss their teeth regularly are also more likely to exercise and eat a healthy diet.
C
Infected gums are more prone to bleeding, which allows bacteria to escape the mouth and irritate arteries.
D
People who experience loss of teeth due to periodontal disease usually cut back on many foods that are harder to chew, such as lean meats and vegetables, and increase their consumption of processed foods like pudding and ice cream.
E
Patients with no history of heart disease are much less likely to have periodontal disease than patients who have had a cardiac transplant.
IMO E
But this was the answer: OA B
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
But E states the contrary of the cause and effect. Since the original statement says peridontal is the reason for heart disease while E says Heart disease leads to peridontal. That is the reason I went for E.seshadrivyas wrote:hey.. that was a very good question. The only reason I can think of is this.
A,C,D all support the argument.
E - also supports by establishing a connection between peridontal and heart disease. Though the statement takes time to comprehend, it can be eliminated.
B - though not the best reason, is the only one among the options that states that there is no correlation between the 2 diseases.
B is the only answer that weakens.
Let us see the cause and effect relation.
periodontal disease -> heart disease.
i.e. X => Y.
We also know that the above causation can be rewrititen as if not Y then not X.
E states just that.
no history of heart disease i.e., not Y , are less likely to have periodonatal disease, i.e., not X.
But by the above equation if we consider B,
it states that not X ( floss regularly, hence less chances of gum disease) => not Y (healthy diet, hence less chances of heart disease).
Thus B weakens the argument.
Let us see the cause and effect relation.
periodontal disease -> heart disease.
i.e. X => Y.
We also know that the above causation can be rewrititen as if not Y then not X.
E states just that.
no history of heart disease i.e., not Y , are less likely to have periodonatal disease, i.e., not X.
But by the above equation if we consider B,
it states that not X ( floss regularly, hence less chances of gum disease) => not Y (healthy diet, hence less chances of heart disease).
Thus B weakens the argument.
- Brian@VeritasPrep
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1031
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:23 pm
- Location: Malibu, CA
- Thanked: 716 times
- Followed by:255 members
- GMAT Score:750
Great question, everyone! This one brings up a pretty important point about Weaken questions - the correct answer is often an alternative explanation for why the premises may be true while the conclusion is not.
An effective thought process on these is to look for the gap in logic while you read the premises. Here, we know that:
-Gum disease and heart disease tend to happen to the same patients (they're correlated)
-The conclusion is that gum disease causes heart disease.
Well, the gap in logic is a fairly common one - correlation does not always mean causation!
There are two somewhat standard responses to this logical flaw (X and Y are correlated, but X does not necessarily cause Y)
1) Y actually causes X (in this case, it could be that heart problems decrease blood flow to the jaw, causing gum deterioration from the inside...that would mean that heart problems actually cause gum disease)
2) X and Y are correlated because of some extra factor (as choice B says, they're correlated because the kind of person who takes care of themselves will avoid both problems, while the type of person who doesn't is vulnerable to both).
Choice B provides an alternative explanation for why the two diseases are correlated, and so it is correct.
Choice E is actually pretty consistent with the conclusion - it says that, in addition to the premise that heart and gum disease tend to occur together, the lack of these diseases is also correlated (if you don't have heart disease, it's likely that you don't have gum disease). It certainly doesn't prove the conclusion, but you could argue that it strengthens it...
An effective thought process on these is to look for the gap in logic while you read the premises. Here, we know that:
-Gum disease and heart disease tend to happen to the same patients (they're correlated)
-The conclusion is that gum disease causes heart disease.
Well, the gap in logic is a fairly common one - correlation does not always mean causation!
There are two somewhat standard responses to this logical flaw (X and Y are correlated, but X does not necessarily cause Y)
1) Y actually causes X (in this case, it could be that heart problems decrease blood flow to the jaw, causing gum deterioration from the inside...that would mean that heart problems actually cause gum disease)
2) X and Y are correlated because of some extra factor (as choice B says, they're correlated because the kind of person who takes care of themselves will avoid both problems, while the type of person who doesn't is vulnerable to both).
Choice B provides an alternative explanation for why the two diseases are correlated, and so it is correct.
Choice E is actually pretty consistent with the conclusion - it says that, in addition to the premise that heart and gum disease tend to occur together, the lack of these diseases is also correlated (if you don't have heart disease, it's likely that you don't have gum disease). It certainly doesn't prove the conclusion, but you could argue that it strengthens it...
Brian Galvin
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep
Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep
Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.
Thanks Brian. However I also have a small query as to validity of B.
In Option B we have to necessarily assume that exercise and eat a healthy diet necessarily reduces the heart disease. It might be possible that reduced heart disease may be only caused by heredity reasons.
Option E seems better.
In Option B we have to necessarily assume that exercise and eat a healthy diet necessarily reduces the heart disease. It might be possible that reduced heart disease may be only caused by heredity reasons.
Option E seems better.
- vikram4689
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1325
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:24 am
- Thanked: 105 times
- Followed by:14 members
Brian, E actually follows the structure above.1) Y actually causes X (in this case, it could be that heart problems decrease blood flow to the jaw, causing gum deterioration from the inside...that would mean that heart problems actually cause gum disease)
Patients with no history of heart disease are much less likely to have periodontal disease than patients who have had a cardiac transplant. MEANS
Patients with history of heart disease are much more likely to have periodontal disease than patients who have had a cardiac transplant. and this means that HEART DISEASE is causing PERIODONTAL DISEASE and not other way round
B is trying to say that although occurrence of both is co-related, they are not dependent on each other BUT assumes the relation b/w diseases & exercise and healthy diet
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:32 am
- Thanked: 5 times
Hi Brain,Brian@VeritasPrep wrote:Great question, everyone! This one brings up a pretty important point about Weaken questions - the correct answer is often an alternative explanation for why the premises may be true while the conclusion is not.
An effective thought process on these is to look for the gap in logic while you read the premises. Here, we know that:
-Gum disease and heart disease tend to happen to the same patients (they're correlated)
-The conclusion is that gum disease causes heart disease.
Well, the gap in logic is a fairly common one - correlation does not always mean causation!
There are two somewhat standard responses to this logical flaw (X and Y are correlated, but X does not necessarily cause Y)
1) Y actually causes X (in this case, it could be that heart problems decrease blood flow to the jaw, causing gum deterioration from the inside...that would mean that heart problems actually cause gum disease)
2) X and Y are correlated because of some extra factor (as choice B says, they're correlated because the kind of person who takes care of themselves will avoid both problems, while the type of person who doesn't is vulnerable to both).
Choice B provides an alternative explanation for why the two diseases are correlated, and so it is correct.
Choice E is actually pretty consistent with the conclusion - it says that, in addition to the premise that heart and gum disease tend to occur together, the lack of these diseases is also correlated (if you don't have heart disease, it's likely that you don't have gum disease). It certainly doesn't prove the conclusion, but you could argue that it strengthens it...
Choice B says that the people who brush and floss their teeth regularly are also more likely to exercise and eat a healthy diet. If this has to be the correct answer then wont we have to ASSUME that people who exercise and eat a healthy diet will not have cardiovascular problems
Is it ok to make such assumptions
Again Option E states that cardiovascular problems increases the probability of dental problems. So this option looks to be a step ahead of correlation. IT probably shows causation
Please help
Regards,
Vishal