Strategy For Problem Solving- Plug In and Approximation

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 5:43 am
I have finished doing all OG-13 problems and while reviewing my error log I found that I am struggling with problems which can be solved by Plugging In or approximation.
How do I work on this particular weakness. Can anyone guide me.

Thanks

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
Elite Legendary Member
Posts: 10392
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Thanked: 2867 times
Followed by:511 members
GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Fri Jun 13, 2014 10:41 am
Hi AkiB,

Many questions in the Quant section (and even some in IR) can be solved either by TESTing Values or TESTING THE ANSWERS. It sounds like you don't use either of those approaches very often, so to build up those skills, you'll have to continuously look for opportunities to try during your studies. As an example, try reviewing your last CAT question-by-question and try to solve as many questions as possible by TESTing Values. You might be surprised at how often it's an applicable approach.

Questions that are based on estimation or approximation almost always include some variation of the word "approximate" in the question and/or answer choices that are "spread out." On these questions you can use standard "rounding rules" to eliminate longer calculations and save some time.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1035
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:13 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Thanked: 474 times
Followed by:365 members

by VivianKerr » Sun Jun 15, 2014 8:05 pm
So these are two very different (but equally awesome) GMAT skills to have in your back pocket.

Approximation is valuable for Integrated Reasoning and for certain Number Properties questions (especially those involving roots or fractions). It's not a MANDATORY skill you need for the GMAT, but it's nice to know you can round numbers off and "ballpark" sometimes, usually on the easier-to-medium level Number Prop questions.

Plugging In (also known as Backsolving) is a MAJOR asset in many Problem Solving questions, especially helpful in difficult Word Problems. When we "plug in," we essentially avoid doing algebra by testing out the 5 answer choices AS IF THEY ARE CORRECT, and seeing if we arrive at the original numbers given in the question-stem. If we do, then we must have landed on the correct answer choice! If an answer choice does NOT make sense with the givens from question-stem, it is obviously incorrect and can be eliminated.

Here's two great pages to see it explained:

https://www.800score.com/content/gre/guidec5b3.html

https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/backsolving-on-gmat-math/

Backsolving teaches us to BE FLEXIBLE and USE THE ANSWER CHOICES. Here's a tough question we can solve by playing with the answer choices:

If j and k are positive integers, j - 2 is divisible by 4 and k - 5 is divisible by 4, all of the following could be the value of j - k EXCEPT:

A) 43
B) 33
C) 21
D) 13
E) 5

--

(j - 2) / 4

(k - 5) / 4

Let's say j = 6 and k = 9. The difference will be a multiple of 3. ELIMINATE B and C.

Now let's keep k = 9 and just keep adding 4 to j, seeing how the difference changes.

If j = 14 and k = 9, the difference is 5. ELIMINATE E.

If j = 22 and k = 9, the difference is 13. ELIMINATE D.

The answer is (A).
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)