Could any one explain the following attached Sc.
Gmat prep Sc - 1
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 11:29 am
- Thanked: 7 times
- Followed by:2 members
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1112
- Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 11:16 am
- Thanked: 77 times
- Followed by:49 members
My Take
Op A: This sentence is crap, a fragment..why??? If u chop of modifiers "included.." and "Elizabeth"...u get
When drafting the declaration of sentiments.....was a call....nonsensical plus No independent clause.
Op B: THAT refers to Women's right convention....so this sentence means Elizabeth wrote convention---> nonsencial
Op D: COMMA + THAT --> NON-RESTRICTIVE MODIFIER always wrong in GMAT
B/W Op C and Op E ----> Op E is more clear in active voice rather than Op C in passive voice
Hence Op E is the ans
Op A: This sentence is crap, a fragment..why??? If u chop of modifiers "included.." and "Elizabeth"...u get
When drafting the declaration of sentiments.....was a call....nonsensical plus No independent clause.
Op B: THAT refers to Women's right convention....so this sentence means Elizabeth wrote convention---> nonsencial
Op D: COMMA + THAT --> NON-RESTRICTIVE MODIFIER always wrong in GMAT
B/W Op C and Op E ----> Op E is more clear in active voice rather than Op C in passive voice
Hence Op E is the ans
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 11:29 am
- Thanked: 7 times
- Followed by:2 members
Friends.....Actually i got struck b/w C and E .... but i missed the passive voice in C......
Thanks for your replies!!!!
Thanks for your replies!!!!