Search found 16 matches
Yep, LSAT is for Law Admission.
greenpui wrote:Thank you for your reply
So I have to get foundation with CR bible,then practice OG and CR question in this site.
PS: LS is Law School Admission Test?? sorry, i don't know
- by IndianJaguar
Fri Nov 20, 2009 6:59 am- Forum: I just Beat The GMAT!
- Topic: Thanks all -Got 700 !
- Replies: 15
- Views: 5038
Hello Greenpui, I didn't use any other book than CR Bible for fundamentals. But used LSAT questions later towards my prep. But I suggest that you go over OG12 CR questions thoroughly. The pattern in real exam is exactly the same. Spend some time with each question and know the patterns. Later, you c...
- by IndianJaguar
Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:53 pm- Forum: I just Beat The GMAT!
- Topic: Thanks all -Got 700 !
- Replies: 15
- Views: 5038
Hello Huss, I believe MGMAT Quant books should be a good start for you. In case if you are finding it complicated, do not hesitate to pick up a high school Math book, which basically should have all concepts tested. Quant you need to practice alot to get speed and the logic. I would say because your...
- by IndianJaguar
Thu Nov 19, 2009 6:57 am- Forum: I just Beat The GMAT!
- Topic: Thanks all -Got 700 !
- Replies: 15
- Views: 5038
Thanks Eric and all. Cramya, yes its indeed a great feeling!. Kaulnikhil, I used LSAT Mastery Bokk by Kaplan. It is basically real LSAT questions arranged in terms of difficulty level and question type. You may find it hard to get those since its not sold as such, but are given to Kaplan LSAT studen...
- by IndianJaguar
Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:21 am- Forum: I just Beat The GMAT!
- Topic: Thanks all -Got 700 !
- Replies: 15
- Views: 5038
Thanks all -Got 700 !
Background: Non-native speaker. Has been in US for the last 10 years. Education: First attempt: 650 (Q49, V27) Current attempt: 700 (Q46, V41). Am I happy with the score - kind of, but I am very, very, very disappointed with my Quant score. Not even in my worst day have I scored anything below 46 f...
- by IndianJaguar
Mon Nov 16, 2009 12:19 pm- Forum: I just Beat The GMAT!
- Topic: Thanks all -Got 700 !
- Replies: 15
- Views: 5038
I like C also, but "it" is consfusing. Does "it" refers to trouble or action, its really far from action. But everything else looks wrong.
- by IndianJaguar
Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:15 am- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: SC
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3108
My answer is D. Idiom => Prohibit X from Y A) B) disclosing of its - wordy and whole sentence is awkward C) if we need to use prohibiting, it should be used as adverbial modifier and should have comma, D) that correctly refers to agreement prohibit X (employees) from Y (discloye of its ..) and them ...
- by IndianJaguar
Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:11 am- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: SC
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7495
- by IndianJaguar
Fri Nov 02, 2007 3:07 pm- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: relative pronoun
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1571
I believe the use of future tense "will know" is better than "would know" (would is past) and "is doing " instead of "was doing". Since the manager wants this to be an ongoing thing in the future the usage in A is better. This is my take.
- by IndianJaguar
Fri Nov 02, 2007 3:05 pm- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: 1000 SC - Q 99
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2432
Good qn, I am only convinced with B though it is troubling me. The use of "but" to contrast two part sentences is good. All other looks awful. Any other thoughts. With A, which refers to Rocky Mountains, so wrong.
- by IndianJaguar
Fri Nov 02, 2007 3:00 pm- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: A tough question
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3493
- by IndianJaguar
Wed Oct 31, 2007 8:44 pm- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: Radeco and Evco - Test 12 Q9, CR1000
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2762
But if its a common recycling dumpster nobody will be able to discern who put what, but if its an individual container and if they don't separate and if penalties are levied for not sorting, residents would prefer Plan 1. For E, Plan 2 says trash will be picked up twice a week so rodent issue is not...
- by IndianJaguar
Wed Oct 31, 2007 8:39 pm- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: Residents - Trash Can - Test 12 Q 8 , CR10000
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5070
This is a must be true question. For a must be true qn the answer is para phrasing a premise or making a statement by combining two or more premises.
A is basically paraphrasing "80% were not wearing seat belt" or 20% were wearing. So A is the answer.
Soomodh
- by IndianJaguar
Wed Oct 31, 2007 8:19 pm- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: 1000 CR - Test 2 Question 14
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2251
- by IndianJaguar
Thu Oct 18, 2007 6:09 pm- Forum: Ask Stacy Blackman
- Topic: UCLA specific qn
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1747
Thanks Amy, I was worried whether applying around Dec 3 week or so will be too late. I understand that Round 2 deadline ends by January 23. Does that mean all the applications between Round 1 deadline and Round deadline will be taken together after January 23 or is it on a daily/weekly basis. Sorry ...
- by IndianJaguar
Tue Oct 16, 2007 5:28 am- Forum: Ask Stacy Blackman
- Topic: UCLA specific qn
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1747