Search found 45 matches
it's ok Aditya. I wouldn't like to argue any more. You be happy with RON etc. I am fine with the inferior solutions, which as per you from OGs. If you think OG answers are wrong so I wouldn't like to argue anymore. I will keep following OG. OG solutions can be incomplete but can never be wrong. (B) ...
- by tathastuGMAT
Sun Apr 27, 2014 12:42 am- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: question about relative pronouns
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3602
I refrain from arguing further on this and would like to stick to my choice until get an expert answer. "which" by itself must follow a comma. I think you need to correct this. "Must" is a very strong word and will be misleading. Please refer Question 10, OG12 explanation. For yo...
- by tathastuGMAT
Sat Apr 26, 2014 11:28 pm- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: question about relative pronouns
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3602
Also how do you see the following sentence: ...........economic benefits to be gained from forests which are dead, mountains of Himalyas, or wetlands that no longer exist this sentence does not seem correct ---> usage of "which" is wrong .also "mountain of himalayas" is wordy al...
- by tathastuGMAT
Sat Apr 26, 2014 2:11 am- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: question about relative pronouns
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3602
Hi Tanuj,
The question is discussed in detail in the following thread:
http://www.beatthegmat.com/despite-rece ... 27151.html
Let us know in case you need further assistance.
-tathastuGMAT
- by tathastuGMAT
Fri Apr 25, 2014 7:15 am- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: expect
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1591
Hi Tanuj,
The question is discussed in detail in the following thread:
http://www.beatthegmat.com/the-hognose- ... 93558.html
Let us know in case you need further assistance.
-tathastuGMAT
- by tathastuGMAT
Fri Apr 25, 2014 7:14 am- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: Confusing
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1250
Hi Tanuj,
The question is discussed in detail in the following thread:
http://www.beatthegmat.com/not-one-of-t ... 82967.html
Let us know in case you need further assistance.
-tathastuGMAT
- by tathastuGMAT
Fri Apr 25, 2014 7:09 am- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: NOT One of the...
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1259
Hi Tanuj,
The question is discussed in detail in the following thread:
http://www.beatthegmat.com/hair-growth-drug-t30429.html
Let us know in case you need further assistance.
-tathastuGMAT
- by tathastuGMAT
Fri Apr 25, 2014 7:08 am- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: Why not D?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1190
Hi Aditya8062, Thanks for adding your point. I would like to understand if I want "that no longer exist" modifier only for wetlands then how can I do so without modifying the remaining sentence? Also how do you see the following sentence: ...........economic benefits to be gained from fore...
- by tathastuGMAT
Fri Apr 25, 2014 6:53 am- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: question about relative pronouns
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3602
Hi Saransh, Pronoun ambiguity is hardly a deciding factor on GMAT SC. If you find a pronoun ambiguous, you may doubt that option to be correct but you should not decide your choice just on ambiguity. There will certainly be more serious(may be subtle) errors. Oflate GMAT is giving less importance to...
- by tathastuGMAT
Thu Apr 24, 2014 5:19 am- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: Pronoun ambiguity
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1623
- by tathastuGMAT
Thu Apr 24, 2014 5:09 am- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: Official 3
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1531
Hi Amaldia, This is a CR question. One should not mix GMAT's SC with CR because there are many places in GMAT CR/RC where GMAC doesn't use SC rules. As per GMAT SC the given sentence is not a very good choice because of the confusion placement of the modifier because this modifier logically fits wit...
- by tathastuGMAT
Thu Apr 24, 2014 5:07 am- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: question about relative pronouns
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3602
Hi Saransh It is not frequently seen that 2 or more options are grammatically correct and one of them is correct just because of concision. There will definitely be more errors especially which are based on meaning. Although two options can be grammatically correct but logically (meaning wise) only ...
- by tathastuGMAT
Thu Apr 24, 2014 4:40 am- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: Concision Doubt
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1305
Hi Saransh It is not frequently seen that 2 or more options are grammatically correct and one of them is correct just because of concision. There will definitely be more errors especially which are based on meaning. Although two options can be grammatically correct but logically (meaning wise) only ...
- by tathastuGMAT
Thu Apr 24, 2014 4:38 am- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: Concision Doubt
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1527
Both could be correct and that depends upon the context they are used. You cannot select or reject a choice just based on this preference. There will certainly be some other errors in the wrong choice. BTW, in most of the questions I have experienced "such that" is correct because that go...
- by tathastuGMAT
Mon Mar 31, 2014 3:42 am- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: EXPERTS PLEASE HELP
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1619
Reasoning According to the author the Soybean growers are planning to shift from Soybean to Cotton because at present the price of Cotton is high and it is expected that it will remain high. This high price is because of less supply but not increased demand. The farmers are shifting from soybean to...
- by tathastuGMAT
Mon Mar 31, 2014 3:27 am- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: GMAT2
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1534