Search found 30 matches


Yes C it should be. Very clearly all choices except C tend to cast a doubt on the judgment just on the basis of number of deaths/mile.

by Nitin.811g

Fri Sep 20, 2013 10:10 pm
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: Automobile
Replies: 2
Views: 1383

IMO OA should be A

by Nitin.811g

Fri Sep 20, 2013 9:54 pm
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: Dating!
Replies: 4
Views: 1664
by Nitin.811g

Fri Sep 20, 2013 8:36 pm
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: I am confused on this CR - Please Help
Replies: 11
Views: 2693
by Nitin.811g

Fri Sep 20, 2013 8:35 pm
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: I am confused on this CR - Please Help
Replies: 11
Views: 2693

[A]Seems Correct. Weakens the fact that the headaches could still be because of food.
Not Relevant in the context of the argument
[C]Not Relevant.
[D]Seemed complicated but not a very straightaway explanation that would weaken the conclusion
[E]Out of scope and

Hence iMO, OA should be A

by Nitin.811g

Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:37 pm
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: Food allergy
Replies: 18
Views: 4828

IMO, the OA should be D

Well the answers seemed pretty close to one another. The only catch was that the second boldface was definitely a conclusion. Now Only Option A and D support that D is a Conclusion. A is ruled out and hence the OA should be D

by Nitin.811g

Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:17 pm
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: The Interstate Bridge over the Apache River, built in the
Replies: 1
Views: 1156

E is the only answer that fits in...

by Nitin.811g

Tue Sep 10, 2013 4:44 am
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: Critical Reasoning OG-13
Replies: 7
Views: 3137

I think the OA should be C Conclusion is : The corporation could be violating the law provided they are not aware of the applicants criminal background and then rejecting him. A - Discussion is based on last 5 years and hence this is not relevant B - Business owner given hiring exemption is out of s...

by Nitin.811g

Mon Sep 09, 2013 1:11 am
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: Job Applicants
Replies: 7
Views: 1673

Let's start analyzing the argument by understanding what is the conclusion: Conclusion is : Only the applicants with the most highly evaluated auditions are offered scholarships. Now see which of the options weakens the conclusion A - Not relevant. Enrolling has nothing to do with scholarships offer...

by Nitin.811g

Mon Sep 09, 2013 12:32 am
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: Trustees
Replies: 6
Views: 2005

I think it should definitely be [spoiler](E)[/spoiler]. This one relates directly to the main point where as others are in and around the main passage but do not correctly summarize it.

by Nitin.811g

Mon Sep 09, 2013 12:08 am
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: Painting
Replies: 4
Views: 1308

Thanks David, that really helps...

by Nitin.811g

Sat Sep 07, 2013 10:29 am
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: Tough CR:
Replies: 11
Views: 2575

STOP! Put on the brakes. This is not a Kaplan question and the answer is not A OA D This an LSAT question from June 1997. It is question 13 of the 2nd Logical Reasoning section of that particular LSAT. Furthermore, this is a type of question that DOES NOT APPEAR on the GMAT. Thanks David for the ex...

by Nitin.811g

Sat Sep 07, 2013 3:11 am
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: Tough CR:
Replies: 11
Views: 2575

IMO, the answer is D
This is the only option that differentiates that there could be another factor responsible for slow growth of plants in urban area.

by Nitin.811g

Sat Sep 07, 2013 2:57 am
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: Greenhouse effect - Sulphur dioxide - Evaluations!!
Replies: 14
Views: 4923

IMO, the correct answer should be B.

Experts have not evaluated the taste and hence concluding that if you want to have a great taste and health, go for the particular gum would be in correct. Please let us know what is the OA.

by Nitin.811g

Mon Aug 26, 2013 10:46 am
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: Galactico gum
Replies: 5
Views: 1904