Search found 111 matches
- by nonameee
Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:52 am- Forum: English Language Tests
- Topic: Writing tip/template
- Replies: 34
- Views: 77245
- by nonameee
Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:28 am- Forum: English Language Tests
- Topic: Writing tip/template
- Replies: 34
- Views: 77245
- by nonameee
Wed Mar 14, 2012 2:14 am- Forum: English Language Tests
- Topic: Writing tip/template
- Replies: 34
- Views: 77245
Dana, for question no 2: Is it OK to qualify an issue? The thing is, at least for me, that presented topics are never black and white and it's difficult to choose one side and stick to it. For example for the topic "Which do you prefer: to travel alone or with a companion?" I would say tha...
- by nonameee
Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:56 am- Forum: English Language Tests
- Topic: Writing tip/template
- Replies: 34
- Views: 77245
- by nonameee
Thu Feb 23, 2012 4:51 am- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: Dangling modifier vs -ING form
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3220
Mitch, thank you.
So if I understood you correctly, the -ING modifier must always (logically) relate to the subject of the main clause, even though the modifier itself modifies the whole clause?
- by nonameee
Mon Feb 20, 2012 9:53 pm- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: Dangling modifier vs -ING form
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3220
Dangling modifier vs -ING form
Manhattan SC Guide says that the following sentence is incorrect (dangling modifier): Using the latest technology, the mechanical problem was solved quickly. I've read numerous posts by experts that an -ING form can modify the whole clause (and not only the subject + the verb of the main clause). Wh...
- by nonameee
Mon Feb 20, 2012 12:39 pm- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: Dangling modifier vs -ING form
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3220
- by nonameee
Sun Feb 19, 2012 12:54 am- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: Question about an OG question
- Replies: 15
- Views: 5713
So are you saying that the pronoun they in "...they would in the past have conceded to rivals. " refers to the sales?
- by nonameee
Sat Feb 18, 2012 2:01 pm- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: Question about an OG question
- Replies: 15
- Views: 5713
Mike, thanks a lot for your help. This is from the OG. Could you also please check my reasoning below? Can someone pls explain why they at the beginning of "...they would in the past have conceded to rivals. " cannot refer to sales. I think I figured that out. The sentence would be differe...
- by nonameee
Sat Feb 18, 2012 1:45 pm- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: Question about an OG question
- Replies: 15
- Views: 5713
The very nature of most CRs is that something is taken for granted: a presumed LINK between the premises and the conclusion. It is for this reason that most CRs are FLAWED. But does it mean that answer choices that say: "It takes something for granted" (as in choice E) will always be wron...
- by nonameee
Thu Feb 16, 2012 12:48 pm- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: Author takes someting for granted
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1880
- by nonameee
Thu Feb 16, 2012 4:10 am- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: GMATPREP: Help do smth VS Help do smth
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2417
Author takes someting for granted
Most people believe that yawning is most powerfully triggered by seeing someone else yawn. This belief about yawning is widespread not only today, but also has been commonplace in many parts of the world in the past, if we are to believe historians of popular culture. Thus, seeing someone else yawn...
- by nonameee
Wed Feb 15, 2012 12:24 pm- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: Author takes someting for granted
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1880
Just one + typical is an oxymoron: a contradiction in terms. If there is JUST ONE of a certain type of collision, then this sort of collision is -- by definition -- not typical but RARE. If MOST collisions are extraordinary, then EXTRAORDINARY collisions are TYPICAL. Thus, if TYPICAL damage in Grea...
- by nonameee
Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:25 am- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: For similar cars and drivers
- Replies: 8
- Views: 11877
Mike, thank you very much for your reply. It was really helpful. There is something very clean about omitting every word that would be repeated from the first clause: all the correct grammar in the first clause is simply implied in the second clause without having to say it. The above is a very good...
- by nonameee
Wed Feb 15, 2012 1:05 am- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: To experts: please explain 'THAN' as a parallel marker
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1553