IMO E. "greatly beloved by generations past and present." Should be using had been here as past and present both are involved. Hi friends, Below is a question I'm finding difficulty in answering. Please help. The author Herman Melville and the poet Walt Whitman are icons of American litera...

My bad :) I suppose mukgera u r highly confused... Please check the solution... I am replying to a post.. Please read carefully.. What I had posted earlier is to prove a scenario in which x is +ve and y is -ve and still we are getting x - y =1 and xy < 0 which according to ur post is not possible. w...

Hi neeraj, if we have x = 0.5 and y = -0.5 then x - y =1 , You didn't considered this scenario in 2). It is not mentioned in the problem that x and y are Integers!! Hope this helps. Please can someone shed light on the answer for this DS question. Is the product xy negative? (1) x^2 – x < 0 (2) (x...

if a = side of the cube A) 6 * a * a = 54 ---> a = 3 --> Volume = a * a * a --> sufficient B) Greatest possible distance = root(3) * a = root(3) * 3 ---> a = 3 --> sufficient IMO D What is the volume of a certain cube? (1) The sum of the areas of the faces of the cube is 54. (2) The greatest possibl...

I think D is the correct choice..as both A) and B) are sufficient!! If a grocery shopper received $0.25 off the original price of a certain product by using a coupon, what was the original price of the product? (1) The shopper received a 20 percent discount by using the coupon. (2) The original pric...

Solving this question from more of a algebraic perspective: A) x^2 - x < 0 ---> Not enough B) (x-4) / (y-3) = 1 So x-4 = y-3 --> y = x-1 ----> Not enough Combining A) and B) put the value of x-1 as y in A) x^2 - x < 0 ---> x(x-1) < 0 ---> xy < 0 ---> Enough So IMO C Please can someone shed light on ...

I think 2) would be answer..because of parallelism issue with 1) Please correct me If I am wrong!! complete the sentence : Some analyst expects automakers___________________________ 1) to be more conservative than they have been in setting dividends. 2) to set dividends more conservatively than they...