SC

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 84
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 10:28 pm
Thanked: 2 times

SC

by mandeepak » Tue Nov 13, 2007 10:05 am
Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.

A. Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.
B. An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that worked well in the past, makes missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting ones likely when they do appear.
C. An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action is likely to miss or misinterpret signs of incipient trouble when they do appear, especially if it has worked well in the past.
D. Executives’ being heavily committed to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes them likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting them when they do appear.
E. Being heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that has worked well in the past, is likely to make an executive miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:43 am

by sonibubu » Tue Nov 13, 2007 5:41 pm
I'm not totally sure, but B and E look best to me. I can't decide which...

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 86
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 3:12 pm

by ranji » Tue Nov 13, 2007 7:40 pm
B seems to be wrong for 2 reasons -

especially one - one can refer to course of action or executive
misinterpreting ones - ones is ambigious here

I think E is correct. ['likely to' is correct, miss and misinterpret parallel]

ans E

whats OA?
ranji

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 6:12 pm

by yxhh2008 » Tue Nov 13, 2007 8:53 pm
my ans is C, what is OA?

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 9:52 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by IndianJaguar » Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:15 am
I like C also, but "it" is consfusing. Does "it" refers to trouble or action, its really far from action. But everything else looks wrong.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 86
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 3:12 pm

by ranji » Wed Nov 14, 2007 5:56 pm
OA pls..
ranji

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 215
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: Mississippi
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:3 members

by Danielle » Thu Nov 15, 2007 12:39 pm
The answer is E.

A -- Terrible! What is 'heavy commitment'? what is 'it' referring to? Wrong.

B -- The first part of the sentence reads well, but the last part of the sentence is out of order. Wrong.

C -- A big ambiguous 'it' appears again at the end of the sentence. What is it referring to? Nothing really. It's wrong.

D -- misinterpreting is in gerund form, this is incorrect. Also 'executives' being heavily committed is the opposite of concise. You could just say, executives' commitment, or better yet, committed executives. Wrong.

E is correct. In proper order, no agreement problems, no awkward constructions, and no pronouns without a reference.
Verbal Tutor

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 6:12 pm

by yxhh2008 » Sun Nov 18, 2007 5:11 pm
I am still confusing about the useage of "one" in E.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 215
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: Mississippi
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:3 members

by Danielle » Sun Nov 18, 2007 6:28 pm
one is a pronoun referring to a particular course of action, as first mentioned in the sentence.
Verbal Tutor