Hi there,
Could you explain to me the reasoning in order to resolve this SC ?
As the housing affordability gap widens, middle-income families are especially hard-hit,and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and rising rental rates force them to use far more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing, leaving them with no equity or tax write-offs to offset the expenditures.
(A) and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and
(B) since these families can no longer afford to buy homes, furthermore
(C) for these families can no longer afford to buy homes, yet
(D) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes; however,
(E) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes, for
Answer is C
SC - housing affordability
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1578
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
- Thanked: 82 times
- Followed by:9 members
- GMAT Score:720
IMO : E, I am surprised C is answer. I am sure C is wrong.
Xbond wrote: As the housing affordability gap widens, middle-income families are especially hard-hit,and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and rising rental rates force them to use far more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing, leaving them with no equity or tax write-offs to offset the expenditures.
(A) and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and
(B) since these families can no longer afford to buy homes, furthermore
(C) for these families can no longer afford to buy homes, yet
(D) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes; however,
(E) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes, for
Answer is C
Charged up again to beat the beast
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:46 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
I thought the answer would have been B, since = just evidence and furthermore says that they are still going in the same direction... overall direction has not changedmaihuna wrote:IMO : E, I am surprised C is answer. I am sure C is wrong.Xbond wrote: As the housing affordability gap widens, middle-income families are especially hard-hit,and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and rising rental rates force them to use far more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing, leaving them with no equity or tax write-offs to offset the expenditures.
(A) and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and
(B) since these families can no longer afford to buy homes, furthermore
(C) for these families can no longer afford to buy homes, yet
(D) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes; however,
(E) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes, for
Answer is C
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 4:18 pm
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 2:48 am
- Thanked: 27 times
- GMAT Score:740
C is correct...it simply says that middle income families are hard hit for {read because} they no longer qualify to buy homes yet they have to spend more than 25% of the income on rentals...
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 869
- Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:49 pm
- Location: California
- Thanked: 13 times
- Followed by:3 members
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1161
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 am
- Location: Sydney
- Thanked: 23 times
- Followed by:1 members
Can you explain why please?
heshamelaziry wrote:Although it is from 1000 SC, this one is correct. "for" means "because"
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:32 pm
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:1 members
Found an explanation from Google.
After having mentioned the "ability to buy a home", we have to mention "the house rents are high too". The latter is an additional problem faced by families. So, a "furthermore" / "yet" / "moreover" / "besides"/"in addition" is required ["yet will have the same meaning as "besides" here].
A is incorrect because "and" doesn't do enough to clearly mention "high rent rates" as an "additional problem".
That leaves us with B and C.
[I hope, I do not need to explain why D and E are incorrect.]
B changes the meaning of the sentence.
B implies : since these families can no longer afford housing - the housing affordability gap widens. [should be the other way round]
Moreover, we don't need a "because" or a "since" here as this is not a cause-effect situation. We need a conjunction instead.
"MIF families are hard hit.. and/for they are unable to afford homes.."
'for' correctly join both sentences.
After having mentioned the "ability to buy a home", we have to mention "the house rents are high too". The latter is an additional problem faced by families. So, a "furthermore" / "yet" / "moreover" / "besides"/"in addition" is required ["yet will have the same meaning as "besides" here].
A is incorrect because "and" doesn't do enough to clearly mention "high rent rates" as an "additional problem".
That leaves us with B and C.
[I hope, I do not need to explain why D and E are incorrect.]
B changes the meaning of the sentence.
B implies : since these families can no longer afford housing - the housing affordability gap widens. [should be the other way round]
Moreover, we don't need a "because" or a "since" here as this is not a cause-effect situation. We need a conjunction instead.
"MIF families are hard hit.. and/for they are unable to afford homes.."
'for' correctly join both sentences.
What we think, we become