SC - housing affordability

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 275
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:19 am
Thanked: 4 times

SC - housing affordability

by Xbond » Sun Oct 18, 2009 5:55 am
Hi there,

Could you explain to me the reasoning in order to resolve this SC ?

As the housing affordability gap widens, middle-income families are especially hard-hit,and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and rising rental rates force them to use far more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing, leaving them with no equity or tax write-offs to offset the expenditures.
(A) and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and
(B) since these families can no longer afford to buy homes, furthermore
(C) for these families can no longer afford to buy homes, yet
(D) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes; however,
(E) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes, for

Answer is C

Legendary Member
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
Thanked: 82 times
Followed by:9 members
GMAT Score:720

Re: SC - housing affordability

by maihuna » Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:02 am
IMO : E, I am surprised C is answer. I am sure C is wrong.
Xbond wrote: As the housing affordability gap widens, middle-income families are especially hard-hit,and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and rising rental rates force them to use far more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing, leaving them with no equity or tax write-offs to offset the expenditures.
(A) and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and
(B) since these families can no longer afford to buy homes, furthermore
(C) for these families can no longer afford to buy homes, yet
(D) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes; however,
(E) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes, for

Answer is C
Charged up again to beat the beast :)

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 275
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:19 am
Thanked: 4 times

by Xbond » Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:08 am
It is the answer from 1000 SC

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 128
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:46 pm
Thanked: 1 times

Re: SC - housing affordability

by fruti_yum » Sun Oct 18, 2009 1:08 pm
maihuna wrote:IMO : E, I am surprised C is answer. I am sure C is wrong.
Xbond wrote: As the housing affordability gap widens, middle-income families are especially hard-hit,and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and rising rental rates force them to use far more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing, leaving them with no equity or tax write-offs to offset the expenditures.
(A) and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and
(B) since these families can no longer afford to buy homes, furthermore
(C) for these families can no longer afford to buy homes, yet
(D) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes; however,
(E) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes, for

Answer is C
I thought the answer would have been B, since = just evidence and furthermore says that they are still going in the same direction... overall direction has not changed

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 4:18 pm

by [email protected] » Sat Oct 24, 2009 3:30 am
me too...

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 371
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 2:48 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:740

by 2010gmat » Sat Oct 24, 2009 9:24 pm
C is correct...it simply says that middle income families are hard hit for {read because} they no longer qualify to buy homes yet they have to spend more than 25% of the income on rentals...

Legendary Member
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:49 pm
Location: California
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:3 members

by heshamelaziry » Sat Oct 24, 2009 9:53 pm
Although it is from 1000 SC, this one is correct. "for" means "because"

Legendary Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 am
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:1 members

by mehravikas » Mon Oct 26, 2009 7:29 pm
Can you explain why please?
heshamelaziry wrote:Although it is from 1000 SC, this one is correct. "for" means "because"

Legendary Member
Posts: 727
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:32 pm
Thanked: 8 times
Followed by:1 members

by umaa » Mon Oct 26, 2009 7:37 pm
Found an explanation from Google.

After having mentioned the "ability to buy a home", we have to mention "the house rents are high too". The latter is an additional problem faced by families. So, a "furthermore" / "yet" / "moreover" / "besides"/"in addition" is required ["yet will have the same meaning as "besides" here].
A is incorrect because "and" doesn't do enough to clearly mention "high rent rates" as an "additional problem".

That leaves us with B and C.
[I hope, I do not need to explain why D and E are incorrect.]

B changes the meaning of the sentence.
B implies : since these families can no longer afford housing - the housing affordability gap widens. [should be the other way round]

Moreover, we don't need a "because" or a "since" here as this is not a cause-effect situation. We need a conjunction instead.
"MIF families are hard hit.. and/for they are unable to afford homes.."
'for' correctly join both sentences.
What we think, we become