• Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep

Saffir-Simpson Hurricane

This topic has 8 member replies
svishal1123 Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
28 Mar 2009
Posted:
49 messages
Upvotes:
3
Target GMAT Score:
750

Saffir-Simpson Hurricane

Post Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:29 pm
The category 1 to 5 rating known as the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale provides an estimate of a hurricane’s potential of destroying or damaging property, and is primarily determined from wind speed; a category 5 storm has wind speeds so high as to blow away small buildings, completely destroy mobile homes, and cause severe window and door damage.

A

B to destroy or damage property, and is primarily determined from wind speed; a category 5 storm has wind speeds high enough

C of destroying or damaging property, and is primarily determined by wind speed; a category 5 storm has wind speeds so high as

D to destroy or damage property, and is primarily determined by wind speed; a category 5 storm has wind speeds high enough

E to destroy or damage property, and is primarily determined by wind speed; a category 5 storm has wind speeds so high as


Will post the OA soon.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
mruzeful Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
04 May 2009
Posted:
58 messages
Upvotes:
1
Post Tue Sep 08, 2009 10:13 am
For Info: as per Manhattan..
so X as to Y is a correct idiom

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
enniguy Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
19 Jul 2008
Posted:
156 messages
Upvotes:
8
Post Tue Sep 08, 2009 8:38 pm
svishal1123 wrote:
...
I had read somewhere that "so as to" is always wrong.
...
"so as to" is wrong. "so as to" is not wrong.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Anaira Mitch Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
26 Oct 2016
Posted:
191 messages
Followed by:
3 members
Upvotes:
3
Post Tue Sep 19, 2017 6:28 am
OE :

When referring to y as the potential outcome of x, the correct idiom is “x’s potential to y.” This
sentence incorrectly phrases the idiom as “a hurricane’s potential of destroying or damaging.” When
referring to the use of y to determine x, the correct idiom is “x is determined by y.” This sentence
incorrectly phrases the idiom as “potential … is determined from wind speeds.” Finally, there is a
subtle distinction between the idiom "so x as to y" and “x is enough to y.” The original sentence uses
the idiom "so x as to y" to indicate that characteristic x is so extreme in the particular case that y
results. In contrast, the idiom "x is enough to y" is used when x is the criteria by which an ability to
achieve y is measured. Thus, if a sentence stated that "a category 5 storm has wind speeds high
enough to blow away small buildings," this would convey a different meaning: that wind speeds are
the criteria by which one measures the ability to blow away small houses.

(A) This choice is incorrect as it repeats the original sentence.

(B) When referring to the use of y to determine x, the correct idiom is “x is determined by y.” This
sentence incorrectly phrases the idiom as “potential … is determined from wind speeds.” The change
from the original idiom "wind speeds so high as to..." to the idiom presented in this sentence “high
enough to...” changes the original meaning of the sentence; it conveys that wind speeds are the
criteria by which one measures the ability to blow away small houses. The idiom "so x as to y" is
required instead to match the original meaning: that characteristic x (the wind speed) is so extreme in
the particular case (a category 5 storm) that y results (small houses are blown away).

(C) When referring to y as the potential outcome of x, the correct idiom is “x’s potential to y.” This
sentence incorrectly phrases the idiom as “a hurricane’s potential of destroying or damaging.”

(D) The idiom “high enough to blow away small buildings” changes the original meaning; it conveys
that wind speeds are the criteria by which one measures the ability to blow away small houses. The
idiom "so x as to y" is required instead to match the original meaning: that characteristic x (the wind
speed) is so extreme in the particular case (a category 5 storm) that y results (small houses are blown
away).

(E) CORRECT. All idioms in the sentence are used correctly.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
thunderdan Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
07 Aug 2009
Posted:
72 messages
Upvotes:
4
GMAT Score:
690
Post Tue Sep 08, 2009 2:38 am
Can some one explain how it can be E??

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
svishal1123 Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
28 Mar 2009
Posted:
49 messages
Upvotes:
3
Target GMAT Score:
750
Post Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:44 pm
My answer was D but OA is E.

I had read somewhere that "so as to" is always wrong.
But as per the OE, it is correct. "Enough as to" is also not wrong. I am unable to understand the difference. Source is MGMAT Test. Below is the OE. Please explain it to me if you are able to understand this.

The idiom “high enough to blow away small buildings” changes the original meaning; it conveys that wind speeds are the criteria by which one measures the ability to blow away small houses. The idiom "so x as to y" is required instead to match the original meaning: that characteristic x (the wind speed) is so extreme in the particular case (a category 5 storm) that y results (small houses are blown away).

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
tom4lax Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
09 Feb 2009
Posted:
175 messages
Upvotes:
4
Post Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:18 pm
Do we know what the OA is? I'd be interested to see what the correct usage is.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
capnx Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
15 Aug 2009
Posted:
268 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Upvotes:
19
Target GMAT Score:
750
GMAT Score:
700
Post Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:31 pm
agree with tom on "determined by" and "potential to destroy", but i think the idiom is: so X as to Y, so go with E: so high as to blow away...

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
tom4lax Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
09 Feb 2009
Posted:
175 messages
Upvotes:
4
Post Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:46 pm
IMO D.

To destroy is the correct usage.

determined by is correct usage.

high enough is correct usage.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag

Best Conversation Starters

1 Roland2rule 170 topics
2 lheiannie07 110 topics
3 ardz24 56 topics
4 LUANDATO 50 topics
5 swerve 48 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

Most Active Experts

1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

155 posts
2 image description Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

122 posts
3 image description GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

121 posts
4 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

110 posts
5 image description DavidG@VeritasPrep

Veritas Prep

81 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts