• Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep

Ryunosuke Akutagawa

This topic has 7 expert replies and 16 member replies
Goto page
  • 1,
  • 2
Next
imskpwr Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
14 Sep 2011
Posted:
377 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Upvotes:
10
Target GMAT Score:
750

Ryunosuke Akutagawa

Post Sun Jun 17, 2012 5:46 am
Ryunosuke Akutagawa‘s knowledge of the literatures of Europe, China and that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as the content of his fiction.

c Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style and
d Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, as it informed his literary style as much as

OG 13 Q79

C is correct, but Why is "d" incorrect.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
iMyself Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
13 Oct 2015
Posted:
53 messages
Post Sat Oct 29, 2016 10:02 am
Ryunosuke Akutagawa‘s knowledge of the literatures of Europe, China and that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as the content of his fiction.

a)that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as
b)that of Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, and it informed his literary style as well as
c)Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style and
d)Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, as it informed his literary style as much as
e)Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style in addition to

Hi Expert,
Here is the correct sentence:
Ryunosuke Akutagawa‘s knowledge of the literatures of Europe, China and Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style and the content of his fiction.

It seems from the non-underlined part that Europe, China and X (unknown) is not the list of 3 things because there is no COMMA before the final AND. As the correct answer is C, China and Japan simultaneously modify ‘knowledge of the literatures of Europe'. If “China and Japan” simultaneously modify “knowledge of blah blah blah”, I can surely say that “China and Japan” is a modifier. So, there should have a COMMA after the word “Japan”, right? If there is NO COMMA after “Japan”, then “was instrumental in his development as a writer” will be the modifier along with “China and Japan”. If “China and Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer” is a modifier, then the “adverbial modifier (informing)” will not make the Cause and effect situation. So, how can we legitimate answer option C as correct?

An Insight from Ron:
x, y, and z are the list of 3 things.
But, (x, y and z) are not the list of 3 things. Alternately, “y and z” simultaneously modify ‘X’

Thank you.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Nina1987 Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
15 Dec 2015
Posted:
79 messages
Followed by:
1 members
GMAT Score:
750
Post Sun May 08, 2016 3:36 am
@Mitch, @Brent and other experts:

So is D incorrect simply cause we don't know if 'it' refers to knowledge or development? Thanks

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag

GMAT/MBA Expert

Ali Tariq GMAT Instructor
Joined
09 Nov 2016
Posted:
258 messages
Followed by:
10 members
Upvotes:
87
Post Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:14 am
Quote:
Ryonosuke Akutagawa's knowledge of the literatures of Europe, China, and that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as the content of his fiction.

A) that of Japan were instrumental in his
development as a writer, informing his literary
style as much as
(B) that of Japan was instrumental in his
development as a writer, and it informed both
his literary style as well as
(C) Japan was instrumental in his development as a
writer, informing both his literary style and
(D) Japan was instrumental in his development as a
writer, as it informed his literary style as much as
(E) Japan were instrumental in his development as
a writer, informing both his literary style in
addition to
Major issue with D is not the pronoun ambiguity but the ambiguity in comparison.
in GMAT SC pronoun ambiguity is not an issue, If you can tell the referent of a pronoun from context.
Ambiguity in comparison is.

Because of ambiguity in comparison, two interpretations are possible.
As the comparison is not crystal clear in D, cross it out.

_________________
GMAT SC tutor
in person in Lahore and online

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag

GMAT/MBA Expert

Post Wed Jan 25, 2017 4:47 am
iMyself wrote:
It seems from the non-underlined part that Europe, China and X (unknown) is not the list of 3 things because there is no COMMA before the final AND.
This is SC79 in the OG13.
In my edition of the OG13, a comma appears after China, as follows:

Quote:
Ryonosuke Akutagawa's knowledge of the literatures of Europe, China, and that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as the content of his fiction.

A) that of Japan were instrumental in his
development as a writer, informing his literary
style as much as
(B) that of Japan was instrumental in his
development as a writer, and it informed both
his literary style as well as
(C) Japan was instrumental in his development as a
writer, informing both his literary style and
(D) Japan was instrumental in his development as a
writer, as it informed his literary style as much as
(E) Japan were instrumental in his development as
a writer, informing both his literary style in
addition to
In A and E, were (plural) does not agree with knowledge (singular).

as well as is a PREPOSITION.
It cannot serve as a substitute for and, which is a CONJUNCTION.
B: both his literary style as well as the content
Here, as well as incorrectly serves as a substitute for and.
Incorrect: both X as well as Y
Correct: both X and Y
Eliminate B.

D: Ryonosuke Akutagawa's knowledge...was instrumental in his development, as it informed his literary style
Here, it is not crystal clear whether it serves to refer to knowledge or to development.
Since C avoids this issue and is free of errors, eliminate D and choose C.

The correct answer is C.

_________________
Mitch Hunt
GMAT Private Tutor
GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "UPVOTE" icon.
Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.
For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com.



Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Wed Jan 25, 2017 8:02 am; edited 1 time in total

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Thanked by: moosehead
Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.
iMyself Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
13 Oct 2015
Posted:
53 messages
Post Tue Jan 24, 2017 4:19 pm
iMyself wrote:
Hi @Marty Murray,
Do you think that THIS sentence is correct? I think THIS sentence doesn't make any sense! Can I've your attention here? Thank you so much for your kind and nice response in another threads.

iMyself wrote:
Ryunosuke Akutagawa‘s knowledge of the literatures of Europe, China and that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as the content of his fiction.

a)that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as
b)that of Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, and it informed his literary style as well as
c)Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style and
d)Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, as it informed his literary style as much as
e)Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style in addition to

Hi Expert,
Here is the correct sentence:
Ryunosuke Akutagawa‘s knowledge of the literatures of Europe, China and Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style and the content of his fiction.

It seems from the non-underlined part that Europe, China and X (unknown) is not the list of 3 things because there is no COMMA before the final AND. As the correct answer is C, China and Japan simultaneously modify ‘knowledge of the literatures of Europe'. If “China and Japan” simultaneously modify “knowledge of blah blah blah”, I can surely say that “China and Japan” is a modifier. So, there should have a COMMA after the word “Japan”, right? If there is NO COMMA after “Japan”, then “was instrumental in his development as a writer” will be the modifier along with “China and Japan”. If “China and Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer” is a modifier, then the “adverbial modifier (informing)” will not make the Cause and effect situation. So, how can we legitimate answer option C as correct?

An Insight from Ron:
x, y, and z are the list of 3 things.
But, (x, y and z) are not the list of 3 things. Alternately, “y and z” simultaneously modify ‘X’

Thank you.
Hi Expert,
can i have a response in this question?
Thank you all...

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
iMyself Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
13 Oct 2015
Posted:
53 messages
Post Fri Nov 04, 2016 8:14 am
Hi @Marty Murray,
Do you think that THIS sentence is correct? I think THIS sentence doesn't make any sense! Can I've your attention here? Thank you so much for your kind and nice response in another threads.

iMyself wrote:
Ryunosuke Akutagawa‘s knowledge of the literatures of Europe, China and that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as the content of his fiction.

a)that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as
b)that of Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, and it informed his literary style as well as
c)Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style and
d)Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, as it informed his literary style as much as
e)Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style in addition to

Hi Expert,
Here is the correct sentence:
Ryunosuke Akutagawa‘s knowledge of the literatures of Europe, China and Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style and the content of his fiction.

It seems from the non-underlined part that Europe, China and X (unknown) is not the list of 3 things because there is no COMMA before the final AND. As the correct answer is C, China and Japan simultaneously modify ‘knowledge of the literatures of Europe'. If “China and Japan” simultaneously modify “knowledge of blah blah blah”, I can surely say that “China and Japan” is a modifier. So, there should have a COMMA after the word “Japan”, right? If there is NO COMMA after “Japan”, then “was instrumental in his development as a writer” will be the modifier along with “China and Japan”. If “China and Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer” is a modifier, then the “adverbial modifier (informing)” will not make the Cause and effect situation. So, how can we legitimate answer option C as correct?

An Insight from Ron:
x, y, and z are the list of 3 things.
But, (x, y and z) are not the list of 3 things. Alternately, “y and z” simultaneously modify ‘X’

Thank you.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
GMAT Kolaveri Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
23 Mar 2012
Posted:
287 messages
Followed by:
6 members
Upvotes:
60
Target GMAT Score:
730
Post Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:20 pm
Quote:
Ryunosuke Akutagawa‘s knowledge of the literatures of Europe, China and that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as the content of his fiction.

that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as
that of Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, and it informed his literary style as well as
Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style and
Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, as it informed his literary style as much as
Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style in addition to
U can narrow it down to C and D.

Why C is correct?
This is one of the most known format on the GMAT [ Clause , +ing form]

In this form the ing form always modifies the clause preceding it. And this could be in any one of the below two formats

The ing form of the verb either describes or presents the results of the clause preceding it.

The company won the $$$ contract, making the company the largest software exporter. [result]
The company won the $$$ contract, using the CEO's contacts.[describes]

Why is D wrong?
This has pronoun error as well as comparison error. I have highlighted this in the option.

_________________
Regards and Thanks,
Vinoth@GMAT Kolaveri
https://www.facebook.com/GmatKolaveri
http://gmatkolaveri.tumblr.com/

Click the thank you button if you like my reply Smile

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
mv12 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
28 Apr 2012
Posted:
150 messages
Upvotes:
4
Post Sat Jun 23, 2012 11:11 am
Ans should be C.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
karthikgmat Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
09 Jul 2008
Posted:
172 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Upvotes:
3
Target GMAT Score:
750
GMAT Score:
610
Post Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:18 am
D is changing meaning of the sentence. Yes causal relationship as imkspwr said.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
imskpwr Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
14 Sep 2011
Posted:
377 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Upvotes:
10
Target GMAT Score:
750
Post Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:07 pm
after a while, I found the real problem with D is that it unnecessarily causes Causation.

Result(Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer), Cause(as it informed his literary style as much as )........INCORRECT MEANING.

CAUSE(Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer), RESULT(informing both his literary style and )...............CORRECT MEANING.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Thanked by: wanderlust
jimmyjimmy Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
29 Apr 2012
Posted:
148 messages
Upvotes:
8
Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 2:34 am
jimmyjimmy wrote:
Ryunosuke Akutagawa‘s knowledge of the literatures of Europe, China and that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as the content of his fiction.

that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as
that of Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, and it informed his literary style as well as
Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style and
Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, as it informed his literary style as much as
Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style in addition to
From parallelism, we have already eliminated (A) & (B), as discussed above. The subject of the sentence, “knowledge”, is singular, so the verb must be singular: “was”, not “were.” That eliminates (E). This leaves (C) and (D), which have many similarities. One difference is the ending. (C) ends simply with “and”, correctly completing the “both … and” structure. (D) avoids the word “both”, and instead ends with “as much as.” The phrase “as much as” is a comparative phrase -- “the teacher like me as much as she like you!” - but in this context, we are not performing a comparison. The two items in question are Akutagawa’s literary style and the content of his fiction. These both were informed by his vast knowledge of literature, but there’s nothing in the sentence that suggests a comparison is in order. (D) also has that awkward phrase “as it informed”, instead of the shorter and more direct “informing” in (C). For these reasons, (D) is incorrect, and (C) is by far the best answer choice.-mike (courtesy)

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
jimmyjimmy Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
29 Apr 2012
Posted:
148 messages
Upvotes:
8
Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 2:24 am
Ryunosuke Akutagawa‘s knowledge of the literatures of Europe, China and that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as the content of his fiction.

that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as
that of Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, and it informed his literary style as well as
Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style and
Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, as it informed his literary style as much as
Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style in addition to

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
imskpwr Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
14 Sep 2011
Posted:
377 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Upvotes:
10
Target GMAT Score:
750
Post Sun Jun 17, 2012 11:22 pm
patanjali.purpose wrote:
Could you share the complete question pls.
Just google it.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
patanjali.purpose Legendary Member Default Avatar
Joined
03 Apr 2011
Posted:
784 messages
Followed by:
12 members
Upvotes:
114
Post Sun Jun 17, 2012 7:29 am
imskpwr wrote:
Ryunosuke Akutagawa‘s knowledge of the literatures of Europe, China and that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as the content of his fiction.

c Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style and
d Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, as it informed his literary style as much as

OG 13 Q79

C is correct, but Why is "d" incorrect.
Could you share the complete question pls.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag

Best Conversation Starters

1 Roland2rule 174 topics
2 lheiannie07 110 topics
3 ardz24 64 topics
4 LUANDATO 56 topics
5 swerve 46 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

Most Active Experts

1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

150 posts
2 image description Jeff@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

145 posts
3 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

116 posts
4 image description GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

103 posts
5 image description Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

98 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts