• Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep

Ryunosuke Akutagawa

This topic has 1 expert reply and 22 member replies
Goto page
  • 1,
  • 2
Next
imskpwr Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
14 Sep 2011
Posted:
377 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Thanked:
10 times
Target GMAT Score:
750

Ryunosuke Akutagawa

Post Sun Jun 17, 2012 5:46 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    Ryunosuke Akutagawa‘s knowledge of the literatures of Europe, China and that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as the content of his fiction.

    c Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style and
    d Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, as it informed his literary style as much as

    OG 13 Q79

    C is correct, but Why is "d" incorrect.

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    Post Sun Jun 17, 2012 7:29 am
    imskpwr wrote:
    Ryunosuke Akutagawa‘s knowledge of the literatures of Europe, China and that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as the content of his fiction.

    c Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style and
    d Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, as it informed his literary style as much as

    OG 13 Q79

    C is correct, but Why is "d" incorrect.
    Could you share the complete question pls.

    imskpwr Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
    Joined
    14 Sep 2011
    Posted:
    377 messages
    Followed by:
    1 members
    Thanked:
    10 times
    Target GMAT Score:
    750
    Post Sun Jun 17, 2012 11:22 pm
    patanjali.purpose wrote:
    Could you share the complete question pls.
    Just google it.

    jimmyjimmy Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
    Joined
    29 Apr 2012
    Posted:
    148 messages
    Thanked:
    8 times
    Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 2:24 am
    Ryunosuke Akutagawa‘s knowledge of the literatures of Europe, China and that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as the content of his fiction.

    that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as
    that of Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, and it informed his literary style as well as
    Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style and
    Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, as it informed his literary style as much as
    Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style in addition to

    jimmyjimmy Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
    Joined
    29 Apr 2012
    Posted:
    148 messages
    Thanked:
    8 times
    Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 2:34 am
    jimmyjimmy wrote:
    Ryunosuke Akutagawa‘s knowledge of the literatures of Europe, China and that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as the content of his fiction.

    that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as
    that of Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, and it informed his literary style as well as
    Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style and
    Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, as it informed his literary style as much as
    Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style in addition to
    From parallelism, we have already eliminated (A) & (B), as discussed above. The subject of the sentence, “knowledge”, is singular, so the verb must be singular: “was”, not “were.” That eliminates (E). This leaves (C) and (D), which have many similarities. One difference is the ending. (C) ends simply with “and”, correctly completing the “both … and” structure. (D) avoids the word “both”, and instead ends with “as much as.” The phrase “as much as” is a comparative phrase -- “the teacher like me as much as she like you!” - but in this context, we are not performing a comparison. The two items in question are Akutagawa’s literary style and the content of his fiction. These both were informed by his vast knowledge of literature, but there’s nothing in the sentence that suggests a comparison is in order. (D) also has that awkward phrase “as it informed”, instead of the shorter and more direct “informing” in (C). For these reasons, (D) is incorrect, and (C) is by far the best answer choice.-mike (courtesy)

    imskpwr Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
    Joined
    14 Sep 2011
    Posted:
    377 messages
    Followed by:
    1 members
    Thanked:
    10 times
    Target GMAT Score:
    750
    Post Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:07 pm
    after a while, I found the real problem with D is that it unnecessarily causes Causation.

    Result(Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer), Cause(as it informed his literary style as much as )........INCORRECT MEANING.

    CAUSE(Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer), RESULT(informing both his literary style and )...............CORRECT MEANING.

    Thanked by: wanderlust
    karthikgmat Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
    Joined
    09 Jul 2008
    Posted:
    172 messages
    Followed by:
    1 members
    Thanked:
    3 times
    Target GMAT Score:
    750
    GMAT Score:
    610
    Post Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:18 am
    D is changing meaning of the sentence. Yes causal relationship as imkspwr said.

    mv12 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    28 Apr 2012
    Posted:
    150 messages
    Thanked:
    4 times
    Post Sat Jun 23, 2012 11:11 am
    Ans should be C.

    GMAT Kolaveri Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
    Joined
    23 Mar 2012
    Posted:
    287 messages
    Followed by:
    6 members
    Thanked:
    60 times
    Target GMAT Score:
    730
    Post Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:20 pm
    Quote:
    Ryunosuke Akutagawa‘s knowledge of the literatures of Europe, China and that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as the content of his fiction.

    that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as
    that of Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, and it informed his literary style as well as
    Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style and
    Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, as it informed his literary style as much as
    Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style in addition to
    U can narrow it down to C and D.

    Why C is correct?
    This is one of the most known format on the GMAT [ Clause , +ing form]

    In this form the ing form always modifies the clause preceding it. And this could be in any one of the below two formats

    The ing form of the verb either describes or presents the results of the clause preceding it.

    The company won the $$$ contract, making the company the largest software exporter. [result]
    The company won the $$$ contract, using the CEO's contacts.[describes]

    Why is D wrong?
    This has pronoun error as well as comparison error. I have highlighted this in the option.

    _________________
    Regards and Thanks,
    Vinoth@GMAT Kolaveri
    https://www.facebook.com/GmatKolaveri
    http://gmatkolaveri.tumblr.com/

    Click the thank you button if you like my reply Smile

    Nina1987 Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    15 Dec 2015
    Posted:
    79 messages
    Followed by:
    1 members
    GMAT Score:
    750
    Post Sun May 08, 2016 3:36 am
    @Mitch, @Brent and other experts:

    So is D incorrect simply cause we don't know if 'it' refers to knowledge or development? Thanks

    iMyself Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
    Joined
    13 Oct 2015
    Posted:
    53 messages
    Post Sat Oct 29, 2016 10:02 am
    Ryunosuke Akutagawa‘s knowledge of the literatures of Europe, China and that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as the content of his fiction.

    a)that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as
    b)that of Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, and it informed his literary style as well as
    c)Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style and
    d)Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, as it informed his literary style as much as
    e)Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style in addition to

    Hi Expert,
    Here is the correct sentence:
    Ryunosuke Akutagawa‘s knowledge of the literatures of Europe, China and Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style and the content of his fiction.

    It seems from the non-underlined part that Europe, China and X (unknown) is not the list of 3 things because there is no COMMA before the final AND. As the correct answer is C, China and Japan simultaneously modify ‘knowledge of the literatures of Europe'. If “China and Japan” simultaneously modify “knowledge of blah blah blah”, I can surely say that “China and Japan” is a modifier. So, there should have a COMMA after the word “Japan”, right? If there is NO COMMA after “Japan”, then “was instrumental in his development as a writer” will be the modifier along with “China and Japan”. If “China and Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer” is a modifier, then the “adverbial modifier (informing)” will not make the Cause and effect situation. So, how can we legitimate answer option C as correct?

    An Insight from Ron:
    x, y, and z are the list of 3 things.
    But, (x, y and z) are not the list of 3 things. Alternately, “y and z” simultaneously modify ‘X’

    Thank you.

    iMyself Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
    Joined
    13 Oct 2015
    Posted:
    53 messages
    Post Fri Nov 04, 2016 8:14 am
    Hi @Marty Murray,
    Do you think that THIS sentence is correct? I think THIS sentence doesn't make any sense! Can I've your attention here? Thank you so much for your kind and nice response in another threads.

    iMyself wrote:
    Ryunosuke Akutagawa‘s knowledge of the literatures of Europe, China and that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as the content of his fiction.

    a)that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as
    b)that of Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, and it informed his literary style as well as
    c)Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style and
    d)Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, as it informed his literary style as much as
    e)Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style in addition to

    Hi Expert,
    Here is the correct sentence:
    Ryunosuke Akutagawa‘s knowledge of the literatures of Europe, China and Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style and the content of his fiction.

    It seems from the non-underlined part that Europe, China and X (unknown) is not the list of 3 things because there is no COMMA before the final AND. As the correct answer is C, China and Japan simultaneously modify ‘knowledge of the literatures of Europe'. If “China and Japan” simultaneously modify “knowledge of blah blah blah”, I can surely say that “China and Japan” is a modifier. So, there should have a COMMA after the word “Japan”, right? If there is NO COMMA after “Japan”, then “was instrumental in his development as a writer” will be the modifier along with “China and Japan”. If “China and Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer” is a modifier, then the “adverbial modifier (informing)” will not make the Cause and effect situation. So, how can we legitimate answer option C as correct?

    An Insight from Ron:
    x, y, and z are the list of 3 things.
    But, (x, y and z) are not the list of 3 things. Alternately, “y and z” simultaneously modify ‘X’

    Thank you.

    iMyself Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
    Joined
    13 Oct 2015
    Posted:
    53 messages
    Post Tue Jan 24, 2017 4:19 pm
    iMyself wrote:
    Hi @Marty Murray,
    Do you think that THIS sentence is correct? I think THIS sentence doesn't make any sense! Can I've your attention here? Thank you so much for your kind and nice response in another threads.

    iMyself wrote:
    Ryunosuke Akutagawa‘s knowledge of the literatures of Europe, China and that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as the content of his fiction.

    a)that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as
    b)that of Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, and it informed his literary style as well as
    c)Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style and
    d)Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, as it informed his literary style as much as
    e)Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style in addition to

    Hi Expert,
    Here is the correct sentence:
    Ryunosuke Akutagawa‘s knowledge of the literatures of Europe, China and Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer, informing both his literary style and the content of his fiction.

    It seems from the non-underlined part that Europe, China and X (unknown) is not the list of 3 things because there is no COMMA before the final AND. As the correct answer is C, China and Japan simultaneously modify ‘knowledge of the literatures of Europe'. If “China and Japan” simultaneously modify “knowledge of blah blah blah”, I can surely say that “China and Japan” is a modifier. So, there should have a COMMA after the word “Japan”, right? If there is NO COMMA after “Japan”, then “was instrumental in his development as a writer” will be the modifier along with “China and Japan”. If “China and Japan was instrumental in his development as a writer” is a modifier, then the “adverbial modifier (informing)” will not make the Cause and effect situation. So, how can we legitimate answer option C as correct?

    An Insight from Ron:
    x, y, and z are the list of 3 things.
    But, (x, y and z) are not the list of 3 things. Alternately, “y and z” simultaneously modify ‘X’

    Thank you.
    Hi Expert,
    can i have a response in this question?
    Thank you all...

    Post Wed Jan 25, 2017 4:47 am
    iMyself wrote:
    It seems from the non-underlined part that Europe, China and X (unknown) is not the list of 3 things because there is no COMMA before the final AND.
    This is SC79 in the OG13.
    In my edition of the OG13, a comma appears after China, as follows:

    Quote:
    Ryonosuke Akutagawa's knowledge of the literatures of Europe, China, and that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as the content of his fiction.

    A) that of Japan were instrumental in his
    development as a writer, informing his literary
    style as much as
    (B) that of Japan was instrumental in his
    development as a writer, and it informed both
    his literary style as well as
    (C) Japan was instrumental in his development as a
    writer, informing both his literary style and
    (D) Japan was instrumental in his development as a
    writer, as it informed his literary style as much as
    (E) Japan were instrumental in his development as
    a writer, informing both his literary style in
    addition to
    In A and E, were (plural) does not agree with knowledge (singular).

    as well as is a PREPOSITION.
    It cannot serve as a substitute for and, which is a CONJUNCTION.
    B: both his literary style as well as the content
    Here, as well as incorrectly serves as a substitute for and.
    Incorrect: both X as well as Y
    Correct: both X and Y
    Eliminate B.

    D: Ryonosuke Akutagawa's knowledge...was instrumental in his development, as it informed his literary style
    Here, it is not crystal clear whether it serves to refer to knowledge or to development.
    Since C avoids this issue and is free of errors, eliminate D and choose C.

    The correct answer is C.

    _________________
    Mitch Hunt
    GMAT Private Tutor
    GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
    If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
    Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.
    For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com.



    Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Wed Jan 25, 2017 8:02 am; edited 1 time in total

    Thanked by: moosehead
    Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.
    Post Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:14 am
    Quote:
    Ryonosuke Akutagawa's knowledge of the literatures of Europe, China, and that of Japan were instrumental in his development as a writer, informing his literary style as much as the content of his fiction.

    A) that of Japan were instrumental in his
    development as a writer, informing his literary
    style as much as
    (B) that of Japan was instrumental in his
    development as a writer, and it informed both
    his literary style as well as
    (C) Japan was instrumental in his development as a
    writer, informing both his literary style and
    (D) Japan was instrumental in his development as a
    writer, as it informed his literary style as much as
    (E) Japan were instrumental in his development as
    a writer, informing both his literary style in
    addition to
    Major issue with D is not the pronoun ambiguity but the ambiguity in comparison.
    in GMAT SC pronoun ambiguity is not an issue, If you can tell the referent of a pronoun from context.
    Ambiguity in comparison is.

    Because of ambiguity in comparison, two interpretations are possible.
    As the comparison is not crystal clear in D, cross it out.

    _________________
    GMAT SC tutor
    in person in Lahore and online

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 Vincen 132 topics
    2 lheiannie07 65 topics
    3 LUANDATO 54 topics
    4 Roland2rule 43 topics
    5 ardz24 40 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    133 posts
    2 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    114 posts
    3 image description EconomistGMATTutor

    The Economist GMAT Tutor

    113 posts
    4 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    109 posts
    5 image description DavidG@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    72 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts