Reared apart from each other

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 435
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 3:55 am
Thanked: 17 times

Reared apart from each other

by madhur_ahuja » Mon Jul 13, 2009 3:46 am
Reared apart from each other, a recent United States study showed striking similarities in identical twins, including many idiosyncrasies of behavior.

(A) Reared apart from each other, a recent United States study showed striking similarities in identical twins, including many idiosyncrasies of behavior.
(B) Reared apart from each other, striking similarities between identical twins that include many idiosyncrasies of behavior were shown in a recent United States study.
(C) A recent United States study showed striking similarities in identical twins reared apart from each other that include many idiosyncrasies of behavior.
(D) According to a recent United States study, identical twins reared apart from each other showed striking similarities, including many idiosyncrasies of behavior.
(E) According to a recent United States study, identical twins showed striking similarities reared apart from each other, including many idiosyncrasies of behavior.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 77
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 10:12 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by shilpi84 » Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:56 am
IMO D

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 115
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 2:18 am
Location: india
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by geet » Mon Jul 13, 2009 6:51 am
yup ...D is the DRACULA!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 171
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:59 pm
Thanked: 8 times

DD

by brick2009 » Mon Jul 13, 2009 6:59 am
Answer is D:

The original sentence: reared apart---What/who? not the US study..so A is X

B--> Illogical

C--> The problem with C is its a Run-on sentence.. continuous and hard to understand

D & E:

Study (was related to) --> Identical twins --> (and the next logical part of the sentence should be related to the twins.).--> who were reared apart E violates this norm


PS: everyones though process is different..;-) ..and this is how i deciphered.. it

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 2:17 am
Location: lahore, pakistan

by hamxa » Mon Mar 01, 2010 11:44 pm
A)-Reared apart from each other, a recent United States study ....(Misplaced mod.)
B)-same reason as above
C)-Use of 'that' is ambiguous.
D)-Right answer !
E)-striking similarities reared apart from each other. Suggesting that striking similarities were reared apart from each other.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 194
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 5:18 am
Thanked: 2 times

by girish3131 » Tue Mar 02, 2010 1:29 am
OA plz...

ta

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 1:53 pm
Followed by:1 members

by gmat800_ » Fri Apr 09, 2010 12:51 pm
I got E

OA ??

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 148
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 11:06 pm
Thanked: 7 times

by pops » Sat Apr 10, 2010 5:29 am
D is d best !

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 758
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 9:32 pm
Location: Bangalore,India
Thanked: 67 times
Followed by:2 members

by sumanr84 » Sat Apr 10, 2010 7:16 am
+1 for D...its misplaced modifier question. hamxa expln holds good.
I am on a break !!

Legendary Member
Posts: 809
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:10 pm
Thanked: 50 times
Followed by:4 members

by akhpad » Sat Apr 10, 2010 7:30 am
One more vote for D

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 301
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 3:18 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by ansumania » Sat Jun 19, 2010 6:04 am
madhur_ahuja wrote: Reared apart from each other, a recent United States study showed striking similarities in identical twins, including many idiosyncrasies of behavior.

(A) Reared apart from each other, a recent United States study showed striking similarities in identical twins, including many idiosyncrasies of behavior.
(B) Reared apart from each other, striking similarities between identical twins that include many idiosyncrasies of behavior were shown in a recent United States study.
(C) A recent United States study showed striking similarities in identical twins reared apart from each other that include many idiosyncrasies of behavior.
(D) According to a recent United States study, identical twins reared apart from each other showed striking similarities, including many idiosyncrasies of behavior.
(E) According to a recent United States study, identical twins showed striking similarities reared apart from each other, including many idiosyncrasies of behavior.
are 'reared' and 'including' used parallely? Not sure...pl. suggest.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:15 pm
ansumania wrote:
madhur_ahuja wrote: Reared apart from each other, a recent United States study showed striking similarities in identical twins, including many idiosyncrasies of behavior.

(A) Reared apart from each other, a recent United States study showed striking similarities in identical twins, including many idiosyncrasies of behavior.
(B) Reared apart from each other, striking similarities between identical twins that include many idiosyncrasies of behavior were shown in a recent United States study.
(C) A recent United States study showed striking similarities in identical twins reared apart from each other that include many idiosyncrasies of behavior.
(D) According to a recent United States study, identical twins reared apart from each other showed striking similarities, including many idiosyncrasies of behavior.
(E) According to a recent United States study, identical twins showed striking similarities reared apart from each other, including many idiosyncrasies of behavior.
are 'reared' and 'including' used parallely? Not sure...pl. suggest.
they are not.

remember that the fundamental foundation of parallelism is parallel CONTEXT -- parallelism is not necessary, or even relevant, unless the two words/constructions are actually describing THE SAME KIND OF THING/SITUATION.

in this problem, "reared" is describing the twins themselves, while "including" modifies the striking similarities.
therefore, since these modifiers are not used in parallel contexts, they don't need to be parallel. (however, they don't need to be NONparallel, either.)
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:19 pm
by the way, this is a poorly written question -- what's the source?

in choice (d), which is presumably intended to be the correct answer, the word "showed" should actually be "show" (i.e., present tense), since this study is showing things that are presented as universal generalities. when universal generalities are presented, they should be presented in the present tense, even if the studies that discovered them are in the past.

for instance:
a 17th-century study showed that human blood circulates through the veins and arteries.
even though the study was in the 17th century, we must still use "circulates" in the present tense, since this is a generality that still applies to humans today. (if we wrote "circulated", then we would be wrongly implying that human blood doesn't work this way anymore.)
the sloppy writing of the correct answer suggests that the twins showed these generalities at the time of the study (hence the past tense), but don't anymore.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 406
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:36 am
Location: Syracuse, NY
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:740

by tomada » Thu Jul 15, 2010 10:53 am
lunarpower wrote:by the way, this is a poorly written question -- what's the source?

in choice (d), which is presumably intended to be the correct answer, the word "showed" should actually be "show" (i.e., present tense), since this study is showing things that are presented as universal generalities. when universal generalities are presented, they should be presented in the present tense, even if the studies that discovered them are in the past.

for instance:
a 17th-century study showed that human blood circulates through the veins and arteries.
even though the study was in the 17th century, we must still use "circulates" in the present tense, since this is a generality that still applies to humans today. (if we wrote "circulated", then we would be wrongly implying that human blood doesn't work this way anymore.)
the sloppy writing of the correct answer suggests that the twins showed these generalities at the time of the study (hence the past tense), but don't anymore.

Hypothetically, if the words "According to" were replaced with the individual word "In", could "showed" be correct, since the sentence would be referring to a specific timeframe (the recent study)?

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Fri Jul 16, 2010 12:11 am
tomada wrote:Hypothetically, if the words "According to" were replaced with the individual word "In", could "showed" be correct, since the sentence would be referring to a specific timeframe (the recent study)?
absolutely yes. nice.

if you say "according to", then the following discussion should represent the point or conclusion of the study, which should ideally be a general principle. if this general principle still applies, then it should be in the present tense.

however, yes, if you have "IN the study/studies", then you're talking about what actually happened in the study/studies. since the studies are not still ongoing, the past tense would be most appropriate in that case.

nicely done.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron