RC Passage - Princeton

This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:36 am

by stephenjmurph » Mon Apr 27, 2015 3:23 am
I originally thought of this as a quant problem: if it's "within weeks," then it must be less than or equal to multiple weeks; so it could be less than 2 weeks and therefore be 1 week which would NOT be several.

BUT, I think the "within" is used more here to signify "surprise" that it only took several weeks. It could have said "And in ONLY several weeks, ... something was made that reproduced the conditions billions of years ago..." But that is too wordy, so in English, we say "within" instead of "only several weeks."

If we said "the hotel was constructed within days" there's no way it was built in one day, the author would just put emphasis that it wasn't constructed in MONTHS.

That's how I'm justifying it at least.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 152
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2015 1:39 am
Location: Rourkela Odisha India
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:650

by akash singhal » Wed May 06, 2015 10:11 pm
The answer is C and correct i guess

If one is thinking why it is not B
then it is said that further experiments lead to discovery in B not that specific one in 1953

others are no related to experiments in 1953

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 37
Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 11:05 pm

by Rahul428 » Wed May 10, 2017 10:12 pm
My answer -D

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 9:42 am
Location: London

by deepak4mba » Fri Mar 02, 2018 11:03 am