• Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT

RALPH KETCHAM

This topic has 1 expert reply and 2 member replies
rosh26 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
21 Apr 2008
Posted:
215 messages
Test Date:
7/1/08
Target GMAT Score:
650

RALPH KETCHAM

Post Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:53 pm
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    Please help with this question...not sure why this LEAST supports it
    Attachments

    This post contains an attachment. You must be logged in to download/view this file. Please login or register as a user.

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    rosh26 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    21 Apr 2008
    Posted:
    215 messages
    Test Date:
    7/1/08
    Target GMAT Score:
    650
    Post Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:53 pm
    Here is the rest
    Attachments

    This post contains an attachment. You must be logged in to download/view this file. Please login or register as a user.

    GMAT/MBA Expert

    Stacey Koprince GMAT Instructor
    Joined
    27 Dec 2006
    Posted:
    2228 messages
    Followed by:
    678 members
    Thanked:
    639 times
    GMAT Score:
    780
    Post Tue Sep 09, 2008 8:01 am
    Got a PM requesting that I look at this. Tough one!

    Summary of passage:
    P1
    K argues that 1st 6 Ps differed for later Ps b/c 1st 6 had values from "classical humanist" (CH) tradition.
    CH: gov't to make people better citizens. public good. NOT private desires / interests. Called to office; not supposed to run. Didn't like political parties b/c partial, self-interested.

    P2
    BUT, from start, CH was undermined by commerce. K does "rightly" show this from 7th P forward. Things became more partisan. CH became assoc. with privilege, aristocracy. K likes CH and doesn't realize it had drawbacks too. Eg, CH incompatible with freedom of speech, etc.

    General point: CH was both good and bad, not all good as K argues

    Question: what doesn't support the AUTHOR'S argument about commerce during J's presidency? This is sort of a cross between RC and a classic CR question - rare on the GMAT, but they can happen. So we have to respond accordingly. Take each statement and imagine that the author of the passage added it to the second paragraph - would that help the author's argument? If so, it's not the right answer.

    Note: the passage author's argument - not Ketcham's POV.
    look in P2
    passage says:
    "Jackson's tenure [was] the culmination of the acceptance of party, commerce, and individualism."
    culmination = something that started before that point in time but really peaked at that time.
    "nonpartisanship lost its relevance"
    "under VanBuren, [the] party gained a new legitimacy"

    Because the question is a LEAST question, four of the answers should provide support for the author's argument and one should not.

    A) Jackson was for commerce. That wouldn't make much sense if "many" of his supporters were against it / resisted it.

    B) Jackson's tenure was characterized by "the acceptance of party" whereas, prior to that time, "parties were partial, self-interested... serving something other than the transcendent public good." So if people didn't protest parties as much during his presidency, that would make sense - political parties were now accepted.

    C) Jackson's tenure was also characterized by "the acceptance of... commerce." If people started using money more during Jackson's tenure, then that would make sense because commerce was now more accepted.

    D) Jackson supported commerce. Groups that did support commerce would likely be for Jackson, then, and groups that did not support commerce would most likely NOT be for Jackson. If the southerners didn't like commerce, then it would make sense that they didn't support Jackson as much.

    E) According to the passage, Washington was a proponent of CH. Jackson was not - he supported commerce, political parties, etc. CH is described in the passage as the "classical" point of view. Therefore, it makes sense to say that Jackson was not as strong a supporter of the classical POV as Washington was.

    _________________
    Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

    Stacey Koprince
    GMAT Instructor
    Director of Online Community
    Manhattan GMAT

    Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

    Learn more about me

    Free Manhattan Prep online events - The first class of every online Manhattan Prep course is free. Classes start every week.
    rosh26 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    21 Apr 2008
    Posted:
    215 messages
    Test Date:
    7/1/08
    Target GMAT Score:
    650
    Post Tue Sep 09, 2008 2:14 pm
    Thanks for the breakdown Stacey - very thorough!

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 Vincen 152 topics
    2 lheiannie07 61 topics
    3 Roland2rule 49 topics
    4 ardz24 40 topics
    5 LUANDATO 32 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    141 posts
    2 image description EconomistGMATTutor

    The Economist GMAT Tutor

    107 posts
    3 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    106 posts
    4 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    104 posts
    5 image description Matt@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    76 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts