Property taxes...

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:57 pm
Location: India
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

Property taxes...

by abhi332 » Wed Mar 17, 2010 12:23 pm
Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per $ 1,000 of officially assessed value. Reassessments should
be frequent in order to remove distortions that arise when property values change at differential rates. In practice,
however, reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government - that is, when their effect is to
increase total tax revenue.
If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a reassessment should
occur but is unlikely to do so?
(A) Property values have risen sharply and uniformly.
(B) Property values have all risen - some very sharply, some less so.
(C) Property values have for the most part risen sharply yet some have dropped slightly.
(D) Property values have for the most part dropped significantly; yet some have risen slightly.
(E) Property values have dropped significantly and uniformly.
What you think, you become.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:27 am
Thanked: 3 times

by boazkhan » Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:52 pm
IMO D. What is OA?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 232
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:47 pm
Thanked: 10 times

by Phirozz » Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:43 pm
IMO D

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:57 pm
Location: India
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

by abhi332 » Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:29 pm
OA:D
What you think, you become.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:50 am

by delhiboy1979 » Thu Mar 18, 2010 1:52 am
Why?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:27 am
Thanked: 3 times

by boazkhan » Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:40 am
What is the source of the problem?

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:57 pm
Location: India
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

by abhi332 » Thu Mar 18, 2010 9:26 am
OG 10
What you think, you become.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 182
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 4:55 am
Thanked: 11 times

by Giorgio » Thu Mar 18, 2010 10:24 am
A B C are clearly out

I think that in the case of sharp drop government must reassess values , that's why it is wrong answer.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Fri Mar 19, 2010 12:44 am
in this problem, you just have to take the statements EXACTLY as given, and do little more than follow directions.

this is an interesting problem type -- i haven't seen too many like this on the gmat.

--

they said: (emphasis mine)
Reassessments should be frequent in order to remove distortions that arise when property values change at differential rates.
there you have it -- the assessment SHOULD be made when "property values change at differential rates".

--

they said: (emphasis mine)
however, reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government - that is, when their effect is to
increase total tax revenue.
there you have it -- they TYPICALLY OCCUR when they will "increase total tax revenue".
so, they typically WON'T occur when they will DECREASE the tax revenue.

--

we're looking for a situation...
in which a reassessment should occur but is unlikely to do so
let's translate:

property values change at differential rates
the asssessment will DECREASE the tax revenue

that's what's happening in choice (d).
the orange part is satisfied, since there's a discrepancy (some values have gone down; others have gone up; hence "differential rates")
the blue part is also satisfied, since the decreases will definitely outweigh the increases, lowering the overall tax revenue.

there you go.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:26 am

by mj41 » Fri Mar 19, 2010 3:17 am
Can someone please explain what is wrong with E

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 355
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 12:42 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by vineetbatra » Fri Mar 19, 2010 11:01 am
mj41 wrote:Can someone please explain what is wrong with E
E is not the answer because the argument says that "Reassessments should
be frequent in order to remove distortions that arise when property values change at differential rates"

In E "Property values have dropped significantly and uniformly."

So the property values have not changed at differential rates, rather they have fallen uni formally so there won't even be a reassessment. Also, instinctively E is just too easy an answer to be correct.

Ron - your thoughts on this will be appreciated.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Sun Mar 21, 2010 2:24 am
vineetbatra wrote:In E "Property values have dropped significantly and uniformly."

So the property values have not changed at differential rates, rather they have fallen uniformly...
this is absolutely correct.
in the color code of my post above: this answer choice satisfies the blue requirement, but not the orange one.
Also, instinctively E is just too easy an answer to be correct.
when you're teaching yourself to improve at critical reasoning, you should try to avoid thinking "instinctively" about anything.
thinking instinctively, by the very definition of "instinctively", will earn you a score no higher than that at which you start your test prep! (i.e., the whole point of test preparation is to overcome those "instincts" that point you in the wrong direction, and learn to answer the questions in ways that are sometimes counterintuitive!)
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Sun Mar 21, 2010 2:28 am
also, as a bonus, i feel obliged to point out the following erroneous structure in your writing:
the property values have not changed at differential rates, rather they have fallen uniformly
i think this construction is correct in british english, but it is incorrect in american english. in american english, you would have to write this sentence as follows:
the property values have not changed at differential rates; rather, they have fallen uniformly
the same is true for other such conjunctions, most notably "however", "nevertheless", and "therefore".
i.e.,
INDEPENDENT CLAUSE, therefore INDEPENDENT CLAUSE --> correct in british english, but incorrect in american english
INDEPENDENT CLAUSE; therefore, INDEPENDENT CLAUSE --> correct in american english

i'm not trying to nitpick here; this is actually one of the very few constructions actually tested on the gmat that is incorrect in american english BUT correct in british english.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 355
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 12:42 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by vineetbatra » Sun Mar 21, 2010 4:47 am
Thanks Ron, please be nitpick, the more we learn the better it is for us.

Cheers,

Vineet

Legendary Member
Posts: 610
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 12:33 am
Thanked: 47 times
Followed by:2 members

by kstv » Sun Mar 21, 2010 9:11 am
@ Lunarpower
Let me be the first to thank you for this post. The takeaways are numerous.