In the xy-plane is the slope of line k equal to 0?
1) The x-intercept of k is 0
2) The y-intercept of k is 0.
The proposed answer is E
However, I assumed it should be A
GMAT's reasoning regarding (1):
If line k has equation y=0, then it has x-intercept equal to 0 and its slope is 0. On the other hand, if line k has equation y = x, then it has x-intercept equal to 0 but its slope is 1.
I disagree with that reasoning as a line y = 0 doesn't have a real x-intercept. The whole x-axis is intercepted. Nothing makes point (0,0) better as a x-intercept than (5,0).
As 1) clearly states that we do have a valid x-intercept, I assumed that our line must have a slope different from 0.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Kevin
Problem with a question from GMATPrep
This topic has expert replies
- rijul007
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 588
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2011 9:42 am
- Location: New Delhi, India
- Thanked: 130 times
- Followed by:9 members
- GMAT Score:720
line y=0 has infinite x-interceptsKevinst wrote: I disagree with that reasoning as a line y = 0 doesn't have a real x-intercept. The whole x-axis is intercepted. Nothing makes point (0,0) better as a x-intercept than (5,0).
As 1) clearly states that we do have a valid x-intercept, I assumed that our line must have a slope different from 0.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Kevin
0 can also be considered as an x-intercept
so in this case is slope of line 0?
Yes
consider line y = x
It has x-intercept = 0
Is the slope equal to 0?
No
Hence the statement is Insufficient
Hope this clears the doubt.
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 8:57 am
- Thanked: 11 times
- Followed by:6 members
I understand your point. Though, I am still not convinced as the wording is "The x-intercept of k is 0". "The" to me means "The one and only". It would have been a different story if they wrote "A x-intercept of k is 0."rijul007 wrote:line y=0 has infinite x-interceptsKevinst wrote: I disagree with that reasoning as a line y = 0 doesn't have a real x-intercept. The whole x-axis is intercepted. Nothing makes point (0,0) better as a x-intercept than (5,0).
As 1) clearly states that we do have a valid x-intercept, I assumed that our line must have a slope different from 0.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Kevin
0 can also be considered as an x-intercept
so in this case is slope of line 0?
Yes
consider line y = x
It has x-intercept = 0
Is the slope equal to 0?
No
Hence the statement is Insufficient
Hope this clears the doubt.
But I agree, I am probably too picky and interpret too much into GMAT's choice of words.
I just hope that I won't see a similar ambiguity on D-Day.
Thanks
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Ian Stewart
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2621
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
- Location: Montreal
- Thanked: 1090 times
- Followed by:355 members
- GMAT Score:780
I can count only three official published problems I've ever seen (among many thousands) that I find mathematically questionable. There's one problem that appeared in an older version of GMATPrep which had the wrong answer (they forgot about negative numbers!), one DS problem which can be solved without any statements at all (an absolute value/inequality question that has been posted on BTG many times), and then there's this problem.
I entirely agree with Kevinst that it makes no sense to talk about the x-intercept of the line y=0. So I find it perfectly reasonable here to think Statement 1 is sufficient - it appears to rule out the possibility that the line is horizontal, so it seems sufficient to give a "no" answer to the question. But of course if you consider x=0 to be 'the' x-intercept of y=0, it isn't sufficient.
While this question is pretty terrible, you can at least take comfort in the fact that the number of bad official questions is negligibly small. So you are almost certain not to encounter this kind of ambiguity on your actual test. And if your answer to this question was different from theirs, don't worry about it.
I entirely agree with Kevinst that it makes no sense to talk about the x-intercept of the line y=0. So I find it perfectly reasonable here to think Statement 1 is sufficient - it appears to rule out the possibility that the line is horizontal, so it seems sufficient to give a "no" answer to the question. But of course if you consider x=0 to be 'the' x-intercept of y=0, it isn't sufficient.
While this question is pretty terrible, you can at least take comfort in the fact that the number of bad official questions is negligibly small. So you are almost certain not to encounter this kind of ambiguity on your actual test. And if your answer to this question was different from theirs, don't worry about it.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com
ianstewartgmat.com
ianstewartgmat.com