Problem Solving for 780+ Aspirants.

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 113
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:23 am
Thanked: 15 times
GMAT Score:730

by prindaroy » Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:51 pm
Your answer is correct if the ant can fly. Ants cannot fly, which is why the word Ant was in bold in the op's post. I was assuming the ant cannot fly, and therefore it would have to crawl to the other end in which case the answer is 6sqrt(5).

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 1:54 pm
Thanked: 3 times
GMAT Score:550

by hariharakarthi » Tue Jul 28, 2009 3:39 pm
Oops...Thanks for explanation prindaroy. I was comparing this question with other question in Cube. Hence, I have not given much imp. to Ant.....
Hence, the flaw...

Anyways, now I understand the prob correctly..

regrds,
hhk

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 12:39 am

Similar DS questions for quant [780+]?

by Syed_Mehboob » Sun Aug 02, 2009 10:27 pm
Hi,

It is my first post. I wanted to know whether there is a thread for 780+ aspirants for DS also. I really liked the 780+ PS (sticky) thread started by sureshbala. Is there any such threads available for DS questions too?

@ Sureshbala: Thanks a lot for those tough question. Have you started any such thread for DS questions too?

Thanks,
Syed

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 164
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 6:34 pm
Location: Bangalore
GMAT Score:590

by iwill » Tue Sep 01, 2009 8:04 am
Guys,

I got it in a different way.
I have constructed a 3-4-5 right triangle and extended it to a prism, where the height is 5. (since hypo- becomes the side of the square.)
Then, if I draw a plane, which passes through points B and O, it must divide the right triangle into two equal angles.

Hence answer is 45.

please see the attached image.

Thanks,
Vivek
Attachments
maths.jpg

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 319
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:32 am
Location: Delhi
Thanked: 84 times
Followed by:9 members

Next Question is here.....

by sureshbala » Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:46 pm
Folks, I am back after a long break.....

Here is the next question.....

In a certain school, out of every 7 students playing Rugby, 3 play Football as well; for every student playing at least one of these two sports, there are 3 students who take up neither. It is known that 10% of the students play only Rugby. Find the percentage of students who play Football.

A. 10%

B. 15%

C. 20%

D. 18%

E. None of these

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 189
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 2:03 pm
Location: USA
Thanked: 21 times

by rohan_vus » Thu Sep 10, 2009 6:00 am
IMO B .

Let out of 100 x be no of students playing Rugby or Football or both . From question stem ratio of (Either Rugby or Football or both/None playing either) = 1/3 . So Number of students out of 100 playing neither of any sport is 3x ==> we have sone simple eqn , x + 3x = 100 , gives x = 25 .

Now x = nof only Rugby + nof Football only + nof football and rugby
so number of Football = 25 - 10 = 15

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 159
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:30 am
Thanked: 19 times

by bharathh » Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:09 am
Can you assume though that the students have to either play either sport or both sports or not play any sports at all?

Seems a bit vague to me. Unless that is the case I'd go with cannot calculate.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 189
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 2:03 pm
Location: USA
Thanked: 21 times

by rohan_vus » Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:16 am
Hi Bharath yes you are right ! i am assuming that there exist only 2 sports football and rubgy . I may be wrong . I feel question should have mentioned that only 2 sports exist .

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 113
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:23 am
Thanked: 15 times
GMAT Score:730

by prindaroy » Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:44 pm
yes the question is a little vague. So, essentially, for out of every 7, three play football as well? Are these the only people playing football? so if there are 70 rugby players then 30 of them play football as well and 40 play only rugby? And so, if 10% of the people play only rugby, then the people playing football should be less right?

Legendary Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pm
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:2 members

by tanviet » Mon Sep 21, 2009 5:33 am
angel ABO= angle ACO because they oposite the same arch in a circle

no need to prove. this concept is out of scope of GMAT.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 3:31 pm

by Talkativetree » Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:33 pm
I love these hard problems. Oddly enough I think they're fun. Is there anywhere else I could find similar problems?

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Oct 24, 2009 9:20 am
Talkativetree wrote:I love these hard problems. Oddly enough I think they're fun. Is there anywhere else I could find similar problems?
You might try Magoosh.
Of the 500 questions there, I'd say that about 100-150 of them are in the 650+ range. (some of them have already been posted in the other forums)
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:07 am

by yregister » Tue Nov 03, 2009 6:33 pm
www.magoosh.com is awesome !! Thanks a lot :)

Currently google's been saying its not a safe site. Well I ignored the message and nothing much happened. Just make sure you don't give ur credit card details anywhere in it :)

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Sat Dec 19, 2009 9:46 pm
hey all.

regarding the "right triangle ABC" problem
(found here: https://www.beatthegmat.com/problem-solv ... 30325.html)

the solutions above would be nice in a geometry course; a lot of them are very pretty.

but - let's assume that this is a gmat problem. (NOTE: this would not conceivably be a gmat problem - it's too obscure/difficult to show up on the test.

if this were a gmat problem:
* it would be multiple choice, with five NUMBERS as answers - say, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50.
therefore:
* that NUMBER would be the same, regardless of the particular shape of the right triangle ABC.
therefore:
* if you can answer the problem for ANY SINGLE EXAMPLE of ABC, then you've got THE answer.


so:

we can just let ABC be a 45-45-90 triangle.
if that's the case, then BO will be a horizontal line, and it will be clear (from symmetry) that BO cuts right angle ABC into two 45-degree angles.
that's all you need.

again, BECAUSE THE PROBLEM WOULD BE MULTIPLE-CHOICE, there's no need to produce such elaborate general solutions; finding just one solution is sufficient.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
Followed by:355 members
GMAT Score:780

by Ian Stewart » Sun Dec 20, 2009 9:44 am
lunarpower wrote:hey all.

regarding the "right triangle ABC" problem
(found here: https://www.beatthegmat.com/problem-solv ... 30325.html)

the solutions above would be nice in a geometry course; a lot of them are very pretty.

but - let's assume that this is a gmat problem. (NOTE: this would not conceivably be a gmat problem - it's too obscure/difficult to show up on the test.

if this were a gmat problem:
* it would be multiple choice, with five NUMBERS as answers - say, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50.
therefore:
* that NUMBER would be the same, regardless of the particular shape of the right triangle ABC.
therefore:
* if you can answer the problem for ANY SINGLE EXAMPLE of ABC, then you've got THE answer.


so:

we can just let ABC be a 45-45-90 triangle.
if that's the case, then BO will be a horizontal line, and it will be clear (from symmetry) that BO cuts right angle ABC into two 45-degree angles.
that's all you need.

again, BECAUSE THE PROBLEM WOULD BE MULTIPLE-CHOICE, there's no need to produce such elaborate general solutions; finding just one solution is sufficient.
Great point, Ron - if you understand this, you can find simple solutions to some of the harder GMAT problems -- Q10, for example, in the diagnostic test at the beginning of OG12 (the one with the pentagram diagram). The solution given in the book introduces 10 unknowns, which is a bit crazy. But since the answers are all numbers (we don't have 'cannot be determined' in the answer choices), that guarantees that the answer is the same no matter how skew or symmetric the diagram; a GMAT question can only have one correct answer, after all. So you can freely assume the pentagon is regular, and thus has interior angles of 108, making all of the triangles isosceles with angles 72, 72 and 36, from which the answer comes immediately; 5*36 = 180.

Note, however, that you could not use this approach on a question like Q179 in the Problem Solving section of OG12; there one of the answers is 'cannot be determined', which means that it is at least possible that the answer may be different depending on what numbers you start with (and indeed, in that question at least, it is different for different starting numbers).
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com