1000 DS, Test 13,

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 1:50 am

1000 DS, Test 13,

by jaheer » Sun Mar 18, 2007 1:54 am
Someone Help me with this.


13. Larry saves x dollars per month. Will Larry’s total savings one year from now exceed his present savings by at least $500 ? (Assume that there is no interest.)

(1) In 6 months Larry's total savings will be $900.
(2) In 3 months Larry's total savings will exceed his present savings by $150.

Thanks
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 789
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:51 pm
Location: Silicon valley, California
Thanked: 30 times
Followed by:1 members

by jayhawk2001 » Sun Mar 18, 2007 8:29 am
For this question, it is sufficient if we know x since 12*x will be the increment
from the present savings.

Let i be the present savings

1 - insufficient. i + 6x = 900. We don't know i and/or x

2 - sufficient. (i + 3x - i) = 150. So x = 50 and so 12x = 600 which is > 500

So, is the answer B ?

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 5:59 am

by keepsmilinyaar » Wed Apr 04, 2007 7:12 am
Larry saves x dollars a month. .
Larry’s total savings one year from now would be 12x dollars in a year.

So 12x should be greater than 500.
So to find an answer we only need to know the value of x.

(1) In 6 months Larry's total savings will be $900.
6x = 900
x can be found out.

(2) In 3 months Larry's total savings will exceed his present savings by $150.
3x = 150
x can be found out..

I think we can find the answers from both the options.
I hope I am correct.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:03 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by guynoor » Wed Apr 04, 2007 8:09 am
keepsmilinyaar wrote:Larry saves x dollars a month. .
Larry’s total savings one year from now would be 12x dollars in a year.

So 12x should be greater than 500.
So to find an answer we only need to know the value of x.

(1) In 6 months Larry's total savings will be $900.
6x = 900
x can be found out.

(2) In 3 months Larry's total savings will exceed his present savings by $150.
3x = 150
x can be found out..

I think we can find the answers from both the options.
I hope I am correct.
Thats true answer can be found from both 1 and 2 so both are alone sufficient.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:03 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by guynoor » Wed Apr 04, 2007 8:11 am
guynoor wrote:
keepsmilinyaar wrote:Larry saves x dollars a month. .
Larry’s total savings one year from now would be 12x dollars in a year.

So 12x should be greater than 500.
So to find an answer we only need to know the value of x.

(1) In 6 months Larry's total savings will be $900.
6x = 900
x can be found out.

(2) In 3 months Larry's total savings will exceed his present savings by $150.
3x = 150
x can be found out..

I think we can find the answers from both the options.
I hope I am correct.
Thats true answer can be found from both 1 and 2 so both are alone sufficient though i am not sure as to the logic you use. I solved it in a different way.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 2:42 pm

by jrdeshpande » Mon Jul 18, 2011 8:49 pm
My appologies for starting the old chain back but I have recently started solving all the DS questions from this forum.


If we go with this logic X comes to 150 in (1) and 50 in (2) which is contradictory. So this is not correct.

We don't know how much Larry's initial saving is and so need to calculate considering his initial saving as 'i'. The correct answer in B.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 461
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 9:09 am
Location: pune
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:3 members

by amit2k9 » Mon Jul 18, 2011 11:39 pm
B is sufficient as

p+3x - p = 150 giving x = 50 and p = 0.
For Understanding Sustainability,Green Businesses and Social Entrepreneurship visit -https://aamthoughts.blocked/
(Featured Best Green Site Worldwide-https://bloggers.com/green/popular/page2)