The perimeter of a rectangle

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 183
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 7:06 am
Location: Washington, DC
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:500

The perimeter of a rectangle

by Rastis » Thu Nov 27, 2014 4:12 pm
If p is the perimeter of rectangle Q, what is the value of p?

1) Each diagonal of rectangle Q has a length of 10

2) The area of rectangle Q is 48.

I think the answer is A because you can use the x, 2x and Xsqrt3 method and find out the other sides.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Nov 27, 2014 6:05 pm
Rastis wrote:If p is the perimeter of rectangle Q, what is the value of p?

1) Each diagonal of rectangle Q has a length of 10

2) The area of rectangle Q is 48.
Let L = length, W = width, D = diagonal.
L² + W² = D².

Statement 1: Each diagonal of rectangle Q has a length of 10
Thus, L² + W² = 10² = 100.

Case 1: L=8 and W=6, with the result that L² + W² = 8²+ 6² = 100.
In this case, p = 8+8+6+6 = 28.

Case 2: L=1 and W=√99, with the result that L² + W² = 1²+ √99² = 100.
In this case, p = 1+1+√99+√99 = 2 + 2√99.

Since p can be different values, INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: The area of rectangle Q is 48
Case 1 also satisfies statement 2.

Case 1: L=8 and W=6, with result that A = 8*6 = 48.
In this case, p=28.

Case 3: L=1 and W=48, with the result that A = 1*48 = 48.
In this case, p = 1+1+48+48 = 98.

Since p can be different values, INSUFFICIENT.

Statements combined:
Only Case 1 satisfies both statements.
Thus, p=28.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2095
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
Thanked: 1443 times
Followed by:247 members

by ceilidh.erickson » Sat Nov 29, 2014 10:52 am
Rastis wrote: I think the answer is A because you can use the x, 2x and Xsqrt3 method and find out the other sides.[/quote

You're making a very dangerous assumption here: the x, 2x, xsqrt3 ratio ONLY applies to 30:60:90 right triangles. We know that the diagonal of the rectangle will create a right triangle, but we don't know that it will be a 30:60:90. It could be a 45:45:90, a 10:80:90, etc.

The GMAT will use "special" right triangles like 30:60:90 and 45:45:90 more often than other more random right triangles, but we can never assume that we have one of these familiar ones unless we're given enough information to prove it.

As a general rule with rectangles, one metric (perimeter, area, diagonal) cannot tell you about another without more information given, but any two will allow you to find that third.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 94
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2014 9:50 am
Location: London, UK
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:770

by mbawisdom » Wed Dec 17, 2014 8:16 am
What do we need to know to work out P? Lets call the length of the rectangle L and the width W. To work out the perimeter we need to know L and W as P = 2.L + 2.W.

Statement 1: diagonal (lets call this D) = 10. Now we know that L^2 + W^2 = 10^2 = 100. The problem though is that we cannot use this alone to get L and W. INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: area of the rectangle is 48. L.W = 48. This doesn't help us either as we cannot determine L and W from just this equation.

Statements 1 & 2 together:

We know that:
(1) L^2 + W^2 = 100
(2) L.W = 48 --> we can rearrange this so that L = 48/W

Using (2), (1) can become: (48/W)^2 + W^2 = 100, which is solvable for W. One trick here is not to go ahead and waste time solving this. It is not necessary. We know we can get W and hence we know we can get L from (2). Thus combined the statements are sufficient. DONT WASTE TIME IN THE EXAM SOLVING EQUATIONS YOU DONT NEED TO SOLVE --> the question asks if it is sufficient not what the actual numbers are!