Announcement, 9/22/08: Beat The GMAT is thrilled to welcome Clear Admit and Accepted.com to our community!

Assumption question


 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Beat The GMAT Forum Index -> GMAT Verbal & Essays -> Critical Reasoning
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dextar
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!


Joined: 29 Jan 2008
Posts: 100

Thanks given: 2
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts

Location: INDIA

PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:15 pm    Post subject: Assumption question Reply with quote

In recent years, many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim as artists. But since furniture must be used, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of the product. For this reason, cabinetmaking is not art.

Which of the following is an assumption that supports the conclusion?

An object is not an art object if its makers pay attention to the objects practical utility

Shouldn't it be
An object is not an art object if its makers don't pay attention to the objects practical utility

because line no 2 'But since furniture must be used, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of the product' assumes that the present cabinetmakers don't pay attention to the practical utility of the product.
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
AleksandrM
GMAT Destroyer!


Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 517

Thanks given: 11
Thanked 17 times in 17 posts

Location: Philadelphia
Test Date: September 8, 2008
Target GMAT Score: 650
GMAT Score: 640

PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 10:03 am    Post subject: Re: Assumption question Reply with quote

dextar wrote:
In recent years, many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim as artists. But since furniture must be used, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of the product. For this reason, cabinetmaking is not art.

Which of the following is an assumption that supports the conclusion?

An object is not an art object if its makers pay attention to the objects practical utility

Shouldn't it be
An object is not an art object if its makers don't pay attention to the objects practical utility

because line no 2 'But since furniture must be used, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of the product' assumes that the present cabinetmakers don't pay attention to the practical utility of the product.


The passage is an argument of the author. He is saying that there are some other - let's assume other art critics - who consider the work of cabinetmakers art. However, the author - perhaps another art critic - is saying that he disagrees that it is art, because furniture has a utility function, which - he considers - disqualifies it from being art.

Therefore, if the makers DON'T pay attention to an object's practical utility, then it is indeed an art object. If they DO, then it is NOT.

It seems to me that you were mislead by the first part of the passage, which summarizes a point of view held by others. However, you are asked to pay attention to the conclusion, which is drawn by the author of the passage.

Hope I did not confuse you too much.

_________________
http://second-lap.blogspot.com/
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
rey.fernandez
GMAT Instructor


Joined: 02 Mar 2008
Posts: 81

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 9 times in 8 posts


PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 12:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with AleksandrM.

This CR assumption problem is the kind in which the conclusion ("Cabinetmaking is not art.") is stated rather abruptly. Between the second and third sentences, there is a logical gap: just because furniture must be used and cabinetmakers have to keep utility in mind, can we immediately conclude that cabinetmaking is not art?

Not quite yet... we need another piece of information that bridges the gap -- a premise that tells us that objects created with utility in mind cannot be art objects. "An object is not an art object if its makers pay attention to the objects practical utility" serves this role nicely. Notice now how the conclusion flows cleanly from this premise.

In general, assumption questions that have an argument containing a logical gap (usually signaled by an abrupt conclusion) will require a premise that will fill in that gap.

Rey

_________________
Rey Fernandez
Instructor
Manhattan GMAT
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
cjiang16
Rising GMAT Star


Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Posts: 71

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 1 times in 1 posts


PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 2:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, AleksandrM is right. Very Happy
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Beat The GMAT Forum Index -> GMAT Verbal & Essays -> Critical Reasoning All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



"GMAT" and other GMAC™ trademarks are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council™. The Graduate Management Admission Council™ does not endorse, nor is it affiliated in any way with the owner or any content on this website. The opinions expressed here are solely those of the author or those of the members of this website. Copyright © 2008 BTG Test Prep, LLC. Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group.